Started By
Message

re: Why would MSU not tell SEC about telephone conversations...

Posted on 11/11/10 at 11:08 am to
Posted by MOT
Member since Jul 2006
28039 posts
Posted on 11/11/10 at 11:08 am to
quote:

Ok, but they sent 2 reports to the SEC, why leave out the most important piece of the story?


That's the question. Is the whole thing about phone conversations just made up? Did State not trust the SEC with all of the information and just wanted to stall until the NCAA was involved?
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36155 posts
Posted on 11/11/10 at 12:03 pm to
I think this is one of those things where people (from the public and media) are confused because they are now getting second hand accounts of what was and wasn't said months ago

What would MSU report to the SEC in January if they didn't tell them about the "money was too much" quote? Did they just pick up a phone and say... "look we really wanted this guy, we thought we had him... and at the last second he went to Auburn".

That wouldn't seem like much of a report. A verbal allegation of him saying "the money was too much to pass up" is still not much in the way of substance (it's suspicious but doesn't stand alone as evidence)

So if I had to guess I'd guess that they provided a verbal and/or written account of Cam and/or his father saying they couldn't pass up the money. If they have that on tape they probably passed that along in Jan or July too... if there are no tapes then obviously they only have the hearsay

And no matter what (tapes or no tapes) that stuff won't stand alone as proof of wrongdoing without demonstrating some sort of paper trail in Auburn IMO... so yeah it takes a while to investigate for the SEC or NCAA
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter