Started By
Message

re: South Carolina reports 14 secondary violations

Posted on 7/7/09 at 10:35 pm to
Posted by Adiossuck
South Carolina Fan
Member since Jan 2007
3768 posts
Posted on 7/7/09 at 10:35 pm to
quote:

“student-athletes were provided impermissible snacks during away-from-home contests.”


I hope we get this violation every year because it is so damn funny to read.

Oh well, according to UT this gives us attention (as obvious by the link being from a UT site) and attention, regardless if negative or positive.. = recruits wanting to play for us.
besides how could they resist not coming to SC just to figure out what these impermissible snacks are?
This post was edited on 7/7/09 at 10:38 pm
Posted by Volmanac
Nashville, TN
Member since May 2009
7733 posts
Posted on 7/7/09 at 10:52 pm to
LMAO. Spurrier is a moron! 14 secondary violations? Why, thats almost as many as the dreaded six secondary violations that doofus Kiffin has rung up! By joe, they'll be running him out of town on a rail in a matter of weeks!

Where is the NCAA on this? I can understand them letting Bama off light for playing ineligible players and UF for fieldinga bunch of criminals, but secondary violations? Inexcusable.
This post was edited on 7/7/09 at 10:53 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter