re: New York Judge Says 2nd Amendment 'Doesn't Exist in This Courtroom'

quote:

---

To say a primary constitutional right "doesnt exist" in your jurisdiction is grounds for removal.

---

I have to imagine this slanted article is using quotes to further that slant.

Was there already a ruling on the applicability of 2A or a motion in limine about referencing it? The article does not say b/c it's shitty. I got 5 SFP dollars that the judge's comments reference something along those lines, where a ruling was already made and the "it doesn't exist here" comment meant within the trial context.

If I'm correct, the judges ruling will be part of the post-trial appeal. If the judge is wrong, the case gets sent back and they re-do the trial "with the 2A existing in the courtroom".