Started By
Message
re: Is Michigan a better job than LSU?
Posted on 1/24/24 at 10:47 am to AU_251
Posted on 1/24/24 at 10:47 am to AU_251
quote:
Michigan more historically relevant.
That's debatable. Sure, they have a lot of wins going back to the 1800s, but until this year they had a total of 1/2 of a national championship since 1948.
2
Posted on 1/24/24 at 10:51 am to MedDawg
quote:
Michigan more historically relevant
quote:How is it debatable? Michigan is #1 in all-time wins and was the first program to win 1000 games. Their titles are older but they have won more.
That's debatable. Sure, they have a lot of wins going back to the 1800s, but until this year they had a total of 1/2 of a national championship since 1948.
Posted on 1/24/24 at 10:54 am to MedDawg
Yea if we are counting ancient national titles then Yale is “more historically relevant” than Alabama and Princeton is “more historically relevant” than every SEC team besides bama
Can always count on an Auburn fan on the SEC rant to have a dumb hot take
Can always count on an Auburn fan on the SEC rant to have a dumb hot take
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News