Started By
Message

re: My Solution For a Fair Play-off

Posted on 12/3/23 at 11:21 pm to
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
17074 posts
Posted on 12/3/23 at 11:21 pm to
Only myself and Corch have offered a solution. Both of ours are about the same. He wants 4 conferences with 20 teams each (2 divisions per conference). I suggested 2 super-conferences with 36 teams each (4 divisions per conference). It all works out the same way no matter which route you go.

Both of our systems can find a conference champ and a national champ with a single 8 team play-off. And neither requires a committee.

The only thing is the will to do a conference realignment. Getting all 72 or 80 schools (or however many) to agree to realign is hard. But it could be done if the schools get paid. Corch's suggestion of 4 conferences might be easier since you wont have to shuffle around as many schools.
Posted by PubeCrab
Member since May 2014
831 posts
Posted on 12/4/23 at 9:16 am to
quote:

Only myself and Corch have offered a solution.

Do we need a solution when a 12 team playoff begins next year?

The only thing that bothers me a little is giving first round bye games. Players get hurt and that is a massive advantage to not play in the first round.
Posted by jangalang
Member since Dec 2014
36897 posts
Posted on 12/4/23 at 11:12 am to
quote:

Only myself and Corch have offered a solution.

The simplest solution is the committee stick with the precedent that undefeated P5 champions matter and then point out FSU didnt schedule Citadel, Louisana Tech, and East Kentucky as their OOC opponents and show their attempt to form a formidable schedule despite their recent weak conferemce performance I believe stability couldve been had.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter