re: Why the lack of bluebloods in the SEC?

quote:

---

They've played in a final game that would produce a national title trophy in 7 straight decades

---

There are Blue Bloods and then there are Blue Bloods.

I find it interesting that when people list all of the Blue Bloods, that there is only one that is still winning.

We (I) tend to think of teams that have been successful in the distant past when I think of BLueBlood. (Texas, USCw, OSU, Michigan, ND, and a couple of others....and only one really still wins at a level worthy to be called a BlueBlood.

(I try to give credit where credit is due) Tip of the cap to Alabama.