Started By
Message
North vs. South
Posted on 6/6/13 at 1:11 pm
Posted on 6/6/13 at 1:11 pm
Would North and South divisions make more sense than East and West divisions?
North:
Missouri
Kentucky
Arkansas
Vanderbilt
Tennessee
Alabama
Georgia
South:
A&M
LSU
State
Ole Miss
Auburn
Florida
South Carolina
Georgia/Auburn, Georgia/Florida and BAMA/Auburn would be the only permanent pairings. This also makes it possible for each of these match-ups to take place in the SEC Championship game. Currently only the Georgia/Auburn pairing is possible. The other marquee pairings (BAMA/Tennessee, LSU/A&M and even LSU/Florida) are already preserved.
I know the South would be a tougher division but what’s the difference between having LSU, A&M and BAMA and LSU, A&M and Florida? Last year aside, Arkansas and South Carolina have been comparable programs over the last five years. Besides, it’s been said a thousand times on this Board that college football is cyclical. Tennessee will recover eventually, which would balance out the divisions.
North:
Missouri
Kentucky
Arkansas
Vanderbilt
Tennessee
Alabama
Georgia
South:
A&M
LSU
State
Ole Miss
Auburn
Florida
South Carolina
Georgia/Auburn, Georgia/Florida and BAMA/Auburn would be the only permanent pairings. This also makes it possible for each of these match-ups to take place in the SEC Championship game. Currently only the Georgia/Auburn pairing is possible. The other marquee pairings (BAMA/Tennessee, LSU/A&M and even LSU/Florida) are already preserved.
I know the South would be a tougher division but what’s the difference between having LSU, A&M and BAMA and LSU, A&M and Florida? Last year aside, Arkansas and South Carolina have been comparable programs over the last five years. Besides, it’s been said a thousand times on this Board that college football is cyclical. Tennessee will recover eventually, which would balance out the divisions.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News