Started By
Message
0
Posted on 10/12/15 at 9:53 pm to Bulldawg2010
quote:
14-22 against ranked teams since 2007.
Does that sound like a guy that's doing his job to you?
Compared to a 24-13 record through 2006.
4-13 record vs top 10 teams.
I'm curious. When people point out these facts to you, what do you say to counter them?
Don't worry. I'll wait.
Ranked teams are always hard to beat.
Besides, that's the way the ball bounces.
Remember the Auburn game just a few years ago?
Posted on 10/12/15 at 9:53 pm to DawgfaninCa
quote:
the Anti Richt crowd
The reputation of UGA football under Richt is underachieving. That was the resounding sentiment nationally before the Bama game and then again before TN.
They all were right.
Posted on 10/12/15 at 9:54 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Kind of like the dropoff from Gurley to Chubb. Its just not a big one in terms of production. I dont think Chubb would have outperformed Sony's performance by any meaningful amount, and again, he didnt play D.
One thing I'll say on this topic is our game plan almost certainly included Chubb pounding the rock, SM in the slot mixing things up. Both took a step backwards when Chubb went out...my $.02.
Posted on 10/12/15 at 9:55 pm to WhopperDawg
quote:
The reputation of UGA football under Richt is underachieving. That was the resounding sentiment nationally before the Bama game and then again before TN.
They all were right.
Yep, the reason Dooley held on for a gazillion years and was respected is that our team played better against the best teams. We just don't do much of that anymore.
Posted on 10/12/15 at 9:57 pm to DawgfaninCa
Yeah that's all I needed to know.
I know weed is legalized over there, can you mail me some?
I would love whatever your smoking.
I know weed is legalized over there, can you mail me some?
I would love whatever your smoking.
Posted on 10/12/15 at 9:58 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Kind of like the dropoff from Gurley to Chubb. Its just not a big one in terms of production. I dont think Chubb would have outperformed Sony's performance by any meaningful amount, and again, he didnt play D.
You've got to be kidding.
Chubb is Heisman material. Sony isn't.
Chubb wouldn't have had to play D if he could have played O for the entire game.
Posted on 10/12/15 at 9:58 pm to WorkinDawg
Hell the last 9 games vs top 15 teams we are ranked above we are 1-8 we aren't even winning the big games we are supposed to win anymore
This post was edited on 10/12/15 at 9:59 pm
Posted on 10/12/15 at 10:05 pm to bigdawg7780
quote:
Hell the last 9 games vs top 15 teams we are ranked above we are 1-8 we aren't even winning the big games we are supposed to win anymore
That's your problem.
You think we are supposed to win a game against a top 15 team just because we are ranked above them.
That ain't how the ball bounces.
Posted on 10/12/15 at 10:09 pm to WorkinDawg
quote:
One thing I'll say on this topic is our game plan almost certainly included Chubb pounding the rock, SM in the slot mixing things up. Both took a step backwards when Chubb went out...my $.02.
Finally, someone is being honest.
Maybe Richt Haters should try it once in a while.
Posted on 10/12/15 at 10:10 pm to DawgfaninCa
quote:
That's your problem.
You think we are supposed to win a game against a top 15 team just because we are ranked above them.
Surley we can do better than 1-8 right??
Posted on 10/12/15 at 10:10 pm to DawgfaninCa
quote:
That's your problem.
You think we are supposed to win a game against a top 15 team just because we are ranked above them.
That ain't how the ball bounces.
Forgive me I thought it was the jackass paid 4 million dollars a year job to win those games, or at least half of them damn.
Posted on 10/12/15 at 10:12 pm to bigdawg7780
No no no no.
We pay him that much to beat our cupcakes and win the east twice when it's down for 5 plus years.
I mean everyone gets raises when they do a shite job? Right?
Oh wait...
We pay him that much to beat our cupcakes and win the east twice when it's down for 5 plus years.
I mean everyone gets raises when they do a shite job? Right?
Oh wait...
Posted on 10/12/15 at 10:14 pm to WhopperDawg
quote:
The reputation of UGA football under Richt is underachieving. That was the resounding sentiment nationally before the Bama game and then again before TN.
They all were right.
Provide the link to that national poll.
I think the main reason UGA has underachieved in past years under Richt is injuries.
Posted on 10/12/15 at 10:20 pm to bigdawg7780
quote:
Forgive me I thought it was the jackass paid 4 million dollars a year job to win those games, or at least half of them damn.
You can pay someone $100 million dollars a year and the team will still lose some games against top 15 teams just because of the way the ball bounces.
Remember Auburn a few years ago?
That is a perfect example of losing a game because of the way the ball bounced.
This post was edited on 10/12/15 at 10:22 pm
Posted on 10/12/15 at 10:25 pm to DawgfaninCa
quote:
Provide the link to that national poll.
There is no national poll on UGA underachieving. Just open your ears and eyes in these days of mass media.
quote:
I think the main reason UGA has underachieved in past years under Richt is injuries.
We have run into our share recently for sure, but what we are talking about here is a 10 year skid.
Posted on 10/12/15 at 10:25 pm to WorkinDawg
quote:
Surley we can do better than 1-8 right??
Surely Lambert's perfect long pass that would have tied the UT game should have been caught, right?
Posted on 10/12/15 at 10:29 pm to DawgfaninCa
quote:
Surely Lambert's perfect long pass that would have tied the UT game should have been caught, right?
You keep harping on this when you're missing the bigger point. You've missed the bigger point during the whole thread. A game with Tennessee should never come down to needing a long bomb to tie it late. Tennessee is awful.
Even if Davis had caught it, Tennessee wouldn't have been in clock killing mode on offense and probably would have scored again anyways.
At this point, I really think you're just trolling people.
This post was edited on 10/12/15 at 10:30 pm
Posted on 10/12/15 at 10:33 pm to WhopperDawg
quote:
Provide the link to that national poll.
quote:
There is no national poll on UGA underachieving. Just open your ears and eyes in these days of mass media.
Then don't act like there was a national poll on UGA underachieving.
A few members of the mass media who are Georgia haters saying it doesn't make it so.
quote:
I think the main reason UGA has underachieved in past years under Richt is injuries.
quote:
We have run into our share recently for sure, but what we are talking about here is a 10 year skid.
It seems like we have major injuries every year when we have a chance to win it all.
After you root for UGA for 50 years like I have then 10 years is just like a flash in the pan.
Posted on 10/12/15 at 10:35 pm to DawgfaninCa
quote:
Why do some people think because we have top ten classes almost every year that means we should never lose a game to an inferior team or play a lousy game once in a while?
Never? Who said never? Try two or three head scratchers a year for the past decade. I mean, what planet am I on here??
Clemson, yes Clemson hasn't lost to an unranked team since 2011.
Page 10 of 17
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News