Started By
Message

re: OT - Senate Report on Intelligence

Posted on 12/10/14 at 12:18 pm to
Posted by germandawg
Member since Sep 2012
14135 posts
Posted on 12/10/14 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

How in the frick is the world a better place without Saddam Hussein????



You can't be this stupid....or can you?


No, I am not that stupid. Saddam Hussein, for all of his warts, was a known quantity. Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iraq are not. Iraq was, just a few years ago, a stable nation in the region, ruled by a brutal dictator no doubt but not a threat to anyone other than Iraq. We knocked that stability out of the region by removing Hussein...and the region is more dangerous today than it was when Hussein was still in power in Iraq. Anyone denying this is simply ill informed or lying. Does the middle east look more stable today than it did 12 years ago? The answer is no and that means the world is more dangerous today than it was 12 years ago. Removing Saddam Hussein from power helped make the world less stable, more dangerous, and not a better place. Iraq is, arguably, better off....but the region and the world is not.
Posted by germandawg
Member since Sep 2012
14135 posts
Posted on 12/10/14 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

All clearances are based on need to know. Therefore one might be cleared to TS or above for some things, but only for Secret, below Secret (Confidential, NOFORN, etc.), or no access for others.



Yes, but if you have a top secret clearance it trumps a secret. You may not need it and if that is the case, from my understanding, it is lowered...but the reverse is not true, again from my understanding. I had the DoE equivalent of top secret and I have had the DoD top secret, both of which would still be in effect if I were in a position that called for them. My current duties require a secret and so my TS was lowered and I have been told IF I needed the TS again it would require the entire investigation again. I could be wrong about this but it is my understanding that a TS is only active when needed and when it is no longer needed it is deactivated and requires an investigation to regain while the secret can and does remain open and active for up to 10 years and can be transferred from agency to agency and basically travels with the person holding it (if the agency allows it). It is my understanding that when the TS is active it supercedes a secret clearance and thus having both at the same time is not possible. You can be cleared for both but I think you can only hold one or the other current....
Posted by Prettyboy Floyd
Pensacola, Florida
Member since Dec 2013
15662 posts
Posted on 12/10/14 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

My current duties require a secret and so my TS was lowered and I have been told IF I needed the TS again it would require the entire investigation again.



A TS has a 5 year life span just like the secret has a 10 year lifespan. As long as you find another job requiring a TS clearance before it expires all you would have to do is your 5 year update in EQIP. I go thru this every 5 years.
Posted by DragginFly
Under the Mountain;By the Lake
Member since Oct 2014
3598 posts
Posted on 12/10/14 at 1:07 pm to
An active security clearance requires an investigation every 15 years for Confidential, every 10 years for Secret, and every 5 years for TS. If your clearance is downgraded, you can have it reinstated within 2 years, if you fall within the reinvestigation window.

As I'm sure you are aware, there are levels of Top Secret which have much more stringent requirements.

To restate it for the novices, holding a Top Secret clearance does not make you privy to all information classified that level and below. You may have a TS in one area and only be authorized for Secret in another. Need to know.
Posted by germandawg
Member since Sep 2012
14135 posts
Posted on 12/10/14 at 1:17 pm to
I read recently that there were 5 million people with the various agency equivalents to a TS clearance....how the hell are 5 million people gonna keep a secret?

I appreciate ya'lls information about the TS...I was under the impression that if I needed it again I would have to do the entire thing over again...not a big deal but having to come up with names and dates from so long ago is a pain in the arse.

I never understood why it is that radiation workers in an operating nuclear facility had to have a Q clearance...the DoE equivalent of a TS clearance while the same worker in a facility under construction OR an employee in the exact same operating facility who does not regularly require rad-worker training may need only a secret clearance (L clearance in the DoE) and possibly no clearance at all. The entire process is more about fishing for people other than the applicant than it is about the applicant themselves. I just did my 10 year renewal and the information required regarding relatives is much more in depth than it has been in the past....and I have had some form of clearance since the late 80's.

And finally for the conspiracy theorists out there...when I first got a TS clearance for the DoE it took about 6 months total time for the investigation...I was granted an interim in about 45 days but it was close to 6 months before it was completed. It now only takes about 45 days from start to finish because the governments ability to verify the information provided is so much quicker. You cant have a wet fart in this country today without some government agency making a note of it and storing that information. There is a sobering thought for the nose pickers among us.....
Posted by DragginFly
Under the Mountain;By the Lake
Member since Oct 2014
3598 posts
Posted on 12/10/14 at 1:24 pm to
Can't answer your nuke facilities question. My experience is in the kind of nukes one might drop on a person or persons.
Posted by Jefferson Dawg
Member since Sep 2012
31961 posts
Posted on 12/10/14 at 1:26 pm to
"Rectal feeding" and "rectal hydration" were apparently some of the tactics used for torture.....

Tell me.....What kind of deviant sicko perverts would think up something like that for torture...and what kind of person would carry out orders like that on another human?

Most americans seem like they have some fairy-tale image of these agents being like Jack Bauer from "24" saving the america from the boogie-man when the reality is that it's just a bunch of lawless evil sicko perverts.....

The report says some of the agents executing the torture orders had previous sexual assault convictions on their records which shouldn't be a surprise.

Hell. I wonder what kinds of things were done that never made it in to any report....

USA! USA! USA!
Posted by Prettyboy Floyd
Pensacola, Florida
Member since Dec 2013
15662 posts
Posted on 12/10/14 at 1:26 pm to
quote:

I read recently that there were 5 million people with the various agency equivalents to a TS clearance....how the hell are 5 million people gonna keep a secret?


Times are changing as well. Pretty soon they are going to start limiting clearances. With the plethora of intelligence leaks it's going to be harder and harder to acquire a clearance and some jobs are going to start requiring a Poly that didn't previously require one. Sometimes an clerance may be requires just based on the rooms you need to enter in order to do your job. You may not need the info being looked at but if your day to day job is involved or assists then you will need that level of clearance to do that work.

My suggestion to you is save your SF86. Make multiple copies of it and keep one stored in a safe deposit box. That way when you have to update your clearance you don't have to go back 10 years. They have made some changes in how far you have to go back making it a little bit easier but it's still a pain in the arse.
Posted by DragginFly
Under the Mountain;By the Lake
Member since Oct 2014
3598 posts
Posted on 12/10/14 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

This treatment was given to U.S. President James A. Garfield after his shooting in 1881, and is asserted to have prolonged his life.


Guess they figured if it was good enough for POTUS....
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41677 posts
Posted on 12/10/14 at 1:32 pm to
Just joining in here but I have a few thoughts on the matter:

1. People suck
2. Governments are made up of greedy and power-hungry people who suck and they abuse the power they have
3. Sucky people will use sucky intentions and sucky means to accomplish sucky outcomes
4. Sucky people sometimes have good intentions
5. Good intentions of sucky people often times lead to sucky outcomes
6. War sucks but can be useful
7. Useful, sucky wars usually have sucky outcomes in many ways
8. Islam sucks
Posted by SquatchDawg
Cohutta Wilderness
Member since Sep 2012
14198 posts
Posted on 12/10/14 at 5:06 pm to
Speaking of how the U.S. has provided stability to the world should we also include Libya and Ukraine?

Oh...and let's don't forget how we provided weapons to the insurgents in Jordan in an attempt to overthrow Assad...who later became the insurgents that destabilized Iraq that we're now fighting.

Only in America do we find ways to justify sending our guys in to fight the guys that we armed to the teeth and trained the previous year. But God forbid we question the CIA....
This post was edited on 12/10/14 at 5:07 pm
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 7Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter