re: The Kailo Thread

quote:

---

We have never seen Thomas. Didnt come to our camps.

---

He did as a JR. Even visited you for the La Tech game, and I believe he came to at least one of your JR days. Freeze chased him EVERY BIT as hard as we chased Bouldin in the weeks leading up to his commitment to State, especially when you thought he may be open because he uOVed to Stanford.

I don't know about how hard we chased Bouldin - You clearly have no clue about how hard you chased Thomas. Chris Jones' recruitment was nothing AT ALL similar to either.

I can do this all day. I already made my concessions about how well I think your team is doing. You obviously would die before you do the same...

quote:

---

He did as a JR. Even visited you for the La Tech game, a

---

Please to God tell me you realize why that's different

quote:

---

I can do this all day. I already made my concessions about how well I think your team is doing. You obviously would die before you do the same...

---

None of you can read. Did I not say if you land those three players or just two of those three (Ramsey, Shump, Dobbs) that your class would be very solid? I said that over and over in this exact thread. Did I not say that Chris Jones has all the tools and I wish we had him? Did I not say that Cox is elite? Did I not say that Austin and Gabe are both very talented under the radar kids? What the frick is wrong with y'all that you can only read negative things I say?

WiO's argument has now done a complete 180 - per the usual!

You said:

quote:

---

We have head 2 head instate battles with Conner, Kailo, Shumpert, Bouldin, and Buchanan. Those kids were pursued heavily by both schools and both schools would make room for any of them.

---

To which I replied:

quote:

---

If Bouldin gets included in this list, Mix and Thomas damn sure do as well...You couldn't have possibly gone any harder after Thomas than you tried to prior to his commitment.

---

Now you come back with:

quote:

---

It goes both ways. You didn't go after Davion because we locked him up. We didnt go after Jake because you locked him up.

---

Good to see you now agree with me after spending the last half dozen replies arguing this point!

quote:

---

. This thread is retarded and yes because I keep posting novels, but what makes it retarded is its the name novels over and over. Please to Gpd explain why it's confusing

---

It is all these things primarily because you can't form a logical viewpoint and/or conclusion and stick to it! If you aren't prepared to debate it logically, don't engage it on that level. Just the usual "OM Stacked, State fricked" would have sufficed...

quote:

---

It is all these things primarily because you can't form a logical viewpoint and/or conclusion and stick to it! If you aren't prepared to debate it logically, don't engage it on that level. Just the usual "OM Stacked, State fricked" would have sufficed...

---

What I've quoted and happens to be on the same page has been my view point. You quoted the Jake comment and I don't understand the confusion. You locked him up. We locked up Davion. Those weren't h2h battles even though both schools would have taken a commitment early on from either. Do you disagree with that or are you just talking in circles?

quote:

---

Once again for the 100th time... It goes both ways. You didn't go after Davion because we locked him up. We didnt go after Jake because you locked him up. We lost out on a lot of players to various schools. We have 9 slots left and we would choose to fill them with two commits (Kailo) who many feel is not yours, and Cox. You have two leans that we would make room in with Shump and Z. It you disagree with that then quote it and explain why. If you don't then stop bringing it up on every single page. I don't know how many times I have to explain it. This thread is retarded and yes because I keep posting novels, but what makes it retarded is its the name novels over and over. Please to Gpd explain why it's confusing

---

quote:

---

It is all these things primarily because you can't form a logical viewpoint and/or conclusion and stick to it! If you aren't prepared to debate it logically, don't engage it on that level.

---

Please to God point out what I said that was not logical and then explain.

Here I'll motivate you...

You are not using logic when you say the recruitment of Jake and Bouldin are the same given that a month before he committed to OM, Bouldin said it was a dead heat tie between two instate school. He's visited your school several times and has been recruited by your coaching staff. Sat down with your staff and went to your camps to be evaluated by your staff.

Jake has been to OM campus one time and Freeze wasn't even the coach. In fact OM didn't even have a coach and that's why none talked to him on his visit his junior year. Our coaches never got a visit from him and never got to recruit the kid because its too late for kids who have their minds made up, just like Davion Johnson. He's been an OM kid his whole life and he was an easy get for us. State didnt have a chance therefore we did not win a h2h battle with him as we did with Bouldin. And just like Davion, you didn't win a h2h battle because we were never in the game with Jake and didnt find him so outstanding that we had to force ourselves into the game like we did with Cox.

He gone flip.

WIO flippin'

I've wasted valuable minutes of my life reading this shite.

KAILO IS GONNA frickIN FLIP

ETA: State is fricked.

It's amazing how bad OM wants Kailo, if I was Mullen I'd tell Kailo if he visits OM id pull his scholarship. Why even play this stupid game if you are going to flip.