Started By
Message
re: What does the rant think about this illegal crack back block?
Posted on 9/30/16 at 8:56 am to Hugh McElroy
Posted on 9/30/16 at 8:56 am to Hugh McElroy
And Tennessee, Auburn and Bama fans (all on the first or first few pages) but other than that...
0
Posted on 9/30/16 at 8:58 am to Hugh McElroy
Block was on the opposite side of the LOS from the play so I don't think it was part of the blocking scheme. He also blocked him towards the play. Looks to me like a relatitory move or a missed blocking assignment. I've seen much, much worse.
Posted on 9/30/16 at 8:59 am to Hugh McElroy
quote:
Where are you seeing a facemark?
You can see the fictitious block in the back but you can see 15 grab his face mask and then sling him around?
8-9 second mark of the clip
This post was edited on 9/30/16 at 9:01 am
Posted on 9/30/16 at 9:04 am to Barneyrb
quote:
You can see the fictitious block in the back but you can see 15 grab his face mask and then sling him around?
You claim to be able to tell in that clip that Garrett has his facemark, but you deny that the blocker blocked him in the back?
OK. Now I know that you frickers are just messing with me.
Posted on 9/30/16 at 9:09 am to Cobb Dawg
quote:
relatitory
retaliatory
Posted on 9/30/16 at 9:35 am to Hugh McElroy
I don't think it's a crackback block if the play is going the other way. I wouldn't really call it a block in the back, either; it looked like he was aiming for Garrett's vagina.
Just kidding, Garrett is a great player. But your vagina is showing with this post.
Just kidding, Garrett is a great player. But your vagina is showing with this post.
Posted on 9/30/16 at 9:38 am to Nado Jenkins83
So we've ran this play or something similar for a long time now (and I'm assuming he did some at Wisconsin too) and it's never been penalized but I guess A&M fans know more than the officials
This post was edited on 9/30/16 at 9:39 am
Posted on 9/30/16 at 10:04 am to gohogs141
They're just mad because they got owned on the cut block debate and now they've moved on to something else to bitch about. If it was up to Aggy no one would be allowed to touch Garrett.
He's a good player but Aggies need to get off his jock. Football is a rough sport. What's dumb is these are the same people bitching about the "pussification of America" and how targeting penalties are ruining the game.
He's a good player but Aggies need to get off his jock. Football is a rough sport. What's dumb is these are the same people bitching about the "pussification of America" and how targeting penalties are ruining the game.
Posted on 9/30/16 at 10:14 am to dbeck
they won't accept that if the players around him were as good as the aggies posters think they are, he wouldn't face this kind of attention.
Posted on 9/30/16 at 10:42 am to Hugh McElroy
To me, the rules are clear and the only subjective part is whether or not he was hit in the back or the side. If i'm the official, i'm saying that's his side because it's not worth calling.... 0.1 sec later, it's unquestionably his back, and would have been a missed call, bc it's still not going to get called.
HOWEVER; bert is purposefully using this blocking scheme and skirting the rules intentionally. It doesn't really bother me though, because it's football and POS coaches are a part of it.
HOWEVER; bert is purposefully using this blocking scheme and skirting the rules intentionally. It doesn't really bother me though, because it's football and POS coaches are a part of it.
Posted on 9/30/16 at 10:45 am to Nguyening
To be truthful, it comes across as dirty to me
Posted on 9/30/16 at 11:06 am to Nado Jenkins83
It may have been misdirection or the blocker thought we were running the other direction. But do know we run that play to the other side and I've seen Hatcher blow up the end of the line on similar plays.
Gotta keep your head on a swivel when you play football.
Gotta keep your head on a swivel when you play football.
Posted on 9/30/16 at 11:06 am to dbeck
quote:
Gotta keep your head on a swivel when you play football.
yep no arguement there.
Posted on 9/30/16 at 11:12 am to Hugh McElroy
(no message)
This post was edited on 9/30/16 at 11:14 am
Posted on 9/30/16 at 12:23 pm to Hugh McElroy
quote:
If the DE is engaging the DT, blocking him INTO the tackle sure as shite ain't gonna help the tackle get to the LBer. And if the DE ain't engaging the DT, then the blindside earhole shot accomplishes nothing except getting a blindside earhole shot.
if you watch the film, you will notice that the OT is slanting away from the DE to cutoff backside pursuit of the LB (does a poor job of it though). The motion man's job is to hit the DE to keep him from pursuing down the line. He hit him at shoulder pads level in the side. It isn't a complicated play.
Posted on 9/30/16 at 12:29 pm to Hugh McElroy
this thread is fricking amateur hour
Page 7 of 7
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News