Started By
Message
What does the rant think about this illegal crack back block?
Posted on 9/29/16 at 8:36 pm
Posted on 9/29/16 at 8:36 pm
LINK
There is a slow motion video in the link. Arkansas put a TE/slot WR in motion in a run play away from Garrett, then crack back blocked him TOWARD the run.
I've never seen that in my life, and I missed it during the game.
Edit: this is unquestionably an illegal block. For proof, see Uncle Gunnysack's post on page 4.
There is a slow motion video in the link. Arkansas put a TE/slot WR in motion in a run play away from Garrett, then crack back blocked him TOWARD the run.
I've never seen that in my life, and I missed it during the game.
Edit: this is unquestionably an illegal block. For proof, see Uncle Gunnysack's post on page 4.
This post was edited on 9/29/16 at 9:46 pm
22
Posted on 9/29/16 at 8:36 pm to Hugh McElroy
It's football... not soccer
Posted on 9/29/16 at 8:36 pm to Hugh McElroy
Dirty
Bert coaches players to be dirty
Bert coaches players to be dirty
Posted on 9/29/16 at 8:39 pm to Hugh McElroy
I look forward to seeing Arky gameplan like that against Mr. Key from LSU.
Oh wait - they won't.
Oh wait - they won't.
Posted on 9/29/16 at 8:39 pm to Old Sarge
Pigs sleep and root in their own shite. That's a filthy animal.
Posted on 9/29/16 at 8:41 pm to Hugh McElroy
Great play. We've been running variations of it for awhile now.
This post was edited on 9/29/16 at 8:42 pm
Posted on 9/29/16 at 8:42 pm to AggieDub14
Whether it's dirty or not, I've never in my life seen that before now. It would never have occurred to me to crack back on a backside DE toward a run play. That's just exceedingly unusual.
Posted on 9/29/16 at 8:43 pm to TheCheshireHog
quote:
We've been running variations of it for awhile now.
Link? I don't believe you.
Posted on 9/29/16 at 8:44 pm to Hugh McElroy
The play looked good and clean to me. i might've thrown a flag on the aTm player for being a bitch. 
Posted on 9/29/16 at 8:44 pm to Butch stones
quote:
It's football... not soccer
Cool. Sounds like you're fine with Kubs block last year then.
Posted on 9/29/16 at 8:46 pm to Hugh McElroy
Contact was above the waist.
Player was not engaged.
No penalty.
Well executed plan to get back side tackle to second level.
Player was not engaged.
No penalty.
Well executed plan to get back side tackle to second level.
This post was edited on 9/29/16 at 8:48 pm
Posted on 9/29/16 at 8:47 pm to Porter Osborne Jr
nah frick him... he's still a piece of shite
Posted on 9/29/16 at 8:48 pm to Hugh McElroy
They started running that motion and block in the Auburn game last year and ran it a couple times each game the rest of the season. It was obvious when they were doing it because they brought in Anthony Antwine and Damon Mitchell which were backups that didn't play. They ran it as a toss to the block side the first four or five times and then they started building in play action passes and other runs off it once they got it on film enough times for teams to jump the toss. It was actually pretty succesful.
This year they've expanded it to different formations, plays and personel groupings as you see there.
This year they've expanded it to different formations, plays and personel groupings as you see there.
This post was edited on 9/29/16 at 8:50 pm
Posted on 9/29/16 at 8:48 pm to Porter Osborne Jr
Your player hit low when the play was over... Arkansas player hit high and never tried to take knees out
Posted on 9/29/16 at 8:49 pm to Hugh McElroy
Bama does that shite all the time.
Posted on 9/29/16 at 8:49 pm to Hugh McElroy
Not dirty at all, but not sure the point of it exactly.
Posted on 9/29/16 at 8:51 pm to makersmark1
quote:
Contact was above the waist. Player was not engaged. No penalty. Well executed plan to get back side tackle to second level.
This.
Posted on 9/29/16 at 8:51 pm to The Baker
quote:
Bama does that shite all the time.
Posted on 9/29/16 at 8:54 pm to makersmark1
quote:
Contact was above the waist. Player was not engaged. No penalty. Well executed plan to get back side tackle to second level.
hes in motion, not in the free blocking zone. should have been a penalty
Posted on 9/29/16 at 8:55 pm to makersmark1
quote:
Well executed plan to get back side tackle to second level
How does blocking the DE into the tackle help get the tackle to the second level? If the DE is engaging the tackle to keep him off the LBer, blocking that DE into the tackle ain't gonna help.
Page 1 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News