Started By
Message

re: What does the rant think about this illegal crack back block?

Posted on 9/30/16 at 8:06 am to
Posted by dbeck
Member since Nov 2014
29451 posts
Posted on 9/30/16 at 8:06 am to
Hugh CrackBackElroy sure is rustled over a legal football play.
Posted by Cooter Davenport
Austin, TX
Member since Apr 2012
9006 posts
Posted on 9/30/16 at 8:09 am to
quote:

Pretty fricking dirty seeing that everyone knows RWIII is coming off a serious neck injury.


1. I seriously doubt our player knew that about him, or even knew who he was tackling. 99% of facemasks and horse-collars occur in the moment without any planning. It just happens.

2. Bert, on the other hand, designs plays with illegal blocks with the purpose of hurting the other team's players.

There's a fundamental difference in intent between 1 and 2.

Our player didn't intend to hurt yours. Bert is designing plays to hurt the other teams' guys. Huge POS.
This post was edited on 9/30/16 at 8:11 am
Posted by TheCheshireHog
Cashew Chicken Country
Member since Oct 2010
40882 posts
Posted on 9/30/16 at 8:12 am to
It is mildly humorous to see how rustled you guys get over a perfectly legal play. I would hate to see how you act when someone actually breaks the rules.
This post was edited on 9/30/16 at 8:13 am
Posted by hilltophog
Fayetteville, Arkansas
Member since Sep 2016
1619 posts
Posted on 9/30/16 at 8:12 am to
quote:

Bert trains his guys to do this, intentionally, as a basic part of his gameplan


And Sumlin teaches his aggots to grab other players junk.



Hell, who am I kiddin, grabbing dicks has been going on well before Sumlin got to AnM:

Aggots at Work

It's an aggot tradition:


Posted by FrankWhite'56
Close to Austin - but not TOO close
Member since Feb 2013
984 posts
Posted on 9/30/16 at 8:15 am to
Judging from the result, there weren't many dicks on the Arky team to grab. Lots of vagina, apparently.
Posted by TheCheshireHog
Cashew Chicken Country
Member since Oct 2010
40882 posts
Posted on 9/30/16 at 8:19 am to
quote:

Judging from the result, there weren't many dicks on the Arky team to grab. Lots of vagina, apparently.


He says in a thread with Aggies whining everywhere.
Posted by Old Sarge
Dean of Admissions, LSU
Member since Jan 2012
55287 posts
Posted on 9/30/16 at 8:24 am to
I like how his eyes are shut
Posted by FrankWhite'56
Close to Austin - but not TOO close
Member since Feb 2013
984 posts
Posted on 9/30/16 at 8:25 am to
quote:

RWIII broke a long run at the top of the 2nd quarter and Evans pulled him down by horse collar to prevent the score


And the next 8 plays you ran from inside the 2yd line were absolute hilarity.
Posted by dbeck
Member since Nov 2014
29451 posts
Posted on 9/30/16 at 8:29 am to
That's a perfect legal play. Yes it sucks getting blocked like that because you don't see it coming. But neither does a qb on a blindside sack. But you don't see other fan bases bitching about Garrett lining up on the qb's blindside. "They put their best DE on the left so he can hit the QB from behind "

If you don't want to get hit hard then don't play football. And if seeing your players get blocked hard makes you cry then maybe you should find a different sport to watch.
Posted by Cooter Davenport
Austin, TX
Member since Apr 2012
9006 posts
Posted on 9/30/16 at 8:36 am to
quote:

That's a perfect legal play.


You're just refusing to read the rules at this point.

Your coach is a thug POS who lost anyway.
Posted by Hugh McElroy
Member since Sep 2013
17379 posts
Posted on 9/30/16 at 8:37 am to
quote:

If the DE is engaging the DT, blocking him INTO the tackle sure as shite ain't gonna help the tackle get to the LBer. And if the DE ain't engaging the DT, then the blindside earhole shot accomplishes nothing except getting a blindside earhole shot.


Why would the DE (defensive end) engage with the DT (defensive tackle)?


I meant OT. Sorry for the typo. I have no how I typed that twice, but I obviously meant OT.
This post was edited on 9/30/16 at 8:41 am
Posted by Hugh McElroy
Member since Sep 2013
17379 posts
Posted on 9/30/16 at 8:39 am to
quote:

At no time during the block can you NOT read both numbers on the maroon jersey, how is that a block in the back?


I can't tell if you're just screwing with me, or if you're looking at the wrong player. Yes, you can see the "1" and the "5" on the back of Garrett's jersey, and that is where he gets blocked. That's why it's a block in the back. And it's illegal for a player who is not on the los at the snap to block in the back.
Posted by Barneyrb
NELA
Member since May 2016
5095 posts
Posted on 9/30/16 at 8:46 am to
quote:

Yes, you can see the "1" and the "5" on the back of Garrett's jersey


End of conversation. His numbers are never hidden.


Now, please answer the question about the facemask afterwards. That was the only thing illegal bout that play.
Posted by hilltophog
Fayetteville, Arkansas
Member since Sep 2016
1619 posts
Posted on 9/30/16 at 8:46 am to
quote:

And the next 8 plays you ran from inside the 2yd line were absolute hilarity


The next play would have been a TD pass to Sprinkle. However, in typical Aggot fashion your defense tried to hug/give Sprinkle a blow job instead:



Thankfully the refs threw the flag on that play.
Posted by Hugh McElroy
Member since Sep 2013
17379 posts
Posted on 9/30/16 at 8:48 am to
quote:

End of conversation. His numbers are never hidden.


What the hell are you talking about that his numbers are never hidden? He was hit in the back by a player who was not on the los when the ball was snapped. Do you deny any of that?

quote:

please answer the question about the facemask afterwards.


Where are you seeing a facemark? I've looked, but I can't find it. There might well be a facemask. I don't care much about the missed call. We beat y'all's arse by 21, so missed calls don't really matter either way. I do care about your coaches teaching your players to make illegal blocks.
This post was edited on 9/30/16 at 8:52 am
Posted by piggilicious
Member since Jan 2011
37299 posts
Posted on 9/30/16 at 8:50 am to
quote:

What does the rant think about this illegal crack back block?


Six pages in, it appears the rant has spoken and has no issue with the play.

Now go buy Sumlin some whiskey, put that liver to rest.

Posted by Barneyrb
NELA
Member since May 2016
5095 posts
Posted on 9/30/16 at 8:51 am to
quote:

What the hell are you talking about that his numbers are never hidden? He was hit in the back by a player who was not on the los when the ball was snapped. Do you deny any of that?


Your definition of back must include the right shoulder/arm. Plain and simple he was knocked on his arse from the hit on his shoulder.
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
59623 posts
Posted on 9/30/16 at 8:51 am to
poor awareness.

2nd team all sec at best
Posted by Hugh McElroy
Member since Sep 2013
17379 posts
Posted on 9/30/16 at 8:53 am to
quote:

Six pages in, it appears the rant has spoken and has no issue with the play.


The only people who are defensing it are inbred Hog fans and aggy hating coonasses.
Posted by Barneyrb
NELA
Member since May 2016
5095 posts
Posted on 9/30/16 at 8:56 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 9/30/16 at 8:57 am
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter