Started By
Message
re: Video proof of refs gettin' paid by the REC, yo.
Posted on 9/30/12 at 1:33 am to fightin tigers
Posted on 9/30/12 at 1:33 am to fightin tigers
quote:
It felt like having sex with a pregnant woman. Hard to get up for a job when it's already done.
Better get used to it with the playoff coming.
0
Posted on 9/30/12 at 1:34 am to TigersRuleTheEarth
FUN FACT: Ole Miss has had the lead against 'Bama more recently than LSU has. 
Posted on 9/30/12 at 1:37 am to Bellabama
quote:
He could have anticipated that he would end up on the other side of him and turned his head to meet him where he thought he'd end up instead of starting on one side and then having to turn his head to follow him. It's usually what people do.
Well if that's what people "usually do"
Posted on 9/30/12 at 1:39 am to fightin tigers
quote:
It felt like having sex with a pregnant woman. Hard to get up for a job when it's already done.
Never had sex with a pregnant woman? There's extra muscles in there or something. Feels like a hand job from two Korean juicy girls.
This post was edited on 9/30/12 at 1:41 am
Posted on 9/30/12 at 1:47 am to Bellabama
quote:
We didn't see where his eyes were... and the guy was walking down the sideline. He could have anticipated that he would end up on the other side of him and turned his head to meet him where he thought he'd end up instead of starting on one side and then having to turn his head to follow him. It's usually what people do.
I'd say it's probably a combination that and the way he bent down with his left arm to right foot to place the ball would make it very awkward to look over his left shoulder.
The way he moved his foot was weird, I'll give the OM guys that, but most of the explanations that have already been posted are very plausible reasons for why we saw what we saw in those few seconds posted.
- Ref off-camera, more towards center of field, was signaling where to spot the ball. (in the still photo it appears that the sideline ref wouldn't have been able to see where the ball was downed since the player has his back to him as he falls) Happens all the time that one ref had a better view of a play than another.
- OM Coach approaching him from behind talking as he was trying to spot the ball. Could also explain why his foot moved some if he was trying to turn and look at the coach behind him at same time.
In the end it doesn't really matter because the right call was made as shown in the photo posted a couple pages back, but it's still fun to debate.
Posted on 9/30/12 at 1:49 am to diddydirtyAubie
LOL cheaters.
Posted on 9/30/12 at 1:57 am to Rig
Posted on 9/30/12 at 1:58 am to TigersRuleTheEarth
quote:
'Splain it to me.
It actually started in 2003 with Oklahoma getting to the BCS game. Since then, there have been various times they've considered, and voted down, the requirement to have someone win the conference. This was done because the goal was to have #1 play #2. To protect this, a detailed instruction was created. It even went so far as to make a provision that stated that if neither team that won the conference was playing in the championship, the champion would be able to bypass the 2 team limit and play in the BCS bowl for their conference.
This would have likely happened this past year had Georgia beaten LSU in the SECCG, and Alabama and LSU still played for the championship.
So I don't understand why LSU has had a problem with it when the possibility was anticipated years before.
Some LSU fans, it would appear, wanted the BCS to create a special rule just for them stating that they wouldn't have to do this. Every school signed off on the rules. Everyone has known for years this was a possibility.
Posted on 9/30/12 at 2:42 am to Legend13
Bama = a bunch of "honey boo boo lovin'" rednecks.
Posted on 9/30/12 at 7:08 am to getback
quote:
Arrakis says you don't even know what you're talking about! That referee did everything exactly by the book.. 1st Down
Thanks, but I don't need a tard speaking for me. The question is why didn't he post the entire play? Instead, he edits and posts only that few seconds to support his preconceived notion. Typical....and funny.
Posted on 9/30/12 at 7:10 am to diddydirtyAubie
The butthurt in that clip was emanating from the screen.
Posted on 9/30/12 at 7:11 am to diddydirtyAubie
One of a handful of shitty calls in that game.
Posted on 9/30/12 at 8:07 am to diddydirtyAubie
quote:
diddydirtyAubie
Have you seen the videos on youtube that show the 9/11 attacks were in fact a government conspiracy brought about to help propel us towards a dictatorship controlled by a powerful consortium of aliens from the planet Grog5?
Send your email address and I'll send you some top secret pdf's showing how the REC is actually apart of that as well.
Posted on 9/30/12 at 8:12 am to stat19
quote:
Have you seen the videos on youtube that show the 9/11 attacks were in fact a government conspiracy brought about to help propel us towards a dictatorship controlled by a powerful consortium of aliens from the planet Grog5?
Send your email address and I'll send you some top secret pdf's showing how the REC is actually apart of that as well.
I saw this video being linked on twitter right before I went to bed. I wake up and there's over 230 comments.
A lot of bads call and missed calls in the game though. Ole Miss got one favorable call and Bama got at least 2 that resulted in points.
This post was edited on 9/30/12 at 8:13 am
Posted on 9/30/12 at 8:18 am to arrakis
quote:
The question is why didn't he post the entire play? Instead, he edits and posts only that few seconds to support his preconceived notion. Typical....and funny.
arrakis has spoken.
/diddy
Posted on 9/30/12 at 8:19 am to diddydirtyAubie
quote:
Aubie
The REC knows you don't spend $200,000 on a 1 & done QB, you invest it long term with officials that are going to be there year after year.
Posted on 9/30/12 at 8:21 am to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
quote:
You know, that is a little odd. The ref is supposed to spot to what he sees on the field.
Yes. he's marking where the ref on the field is.
Posted on 9/30/12 at 8:25 am to darkhorse
If we are paying for calls, we picked the wrong spot, IMO. Should have saved our cash for that BS pass interference call on Nico on 3rd down that kept the Ole Miss scoring drive alive. Oh well, always something to improve on.
Posted on 9/30/12 at 8:27 am to CaptSpaulding
quote:
If we are paying for calls, we picked the wrong spot, IMO. Should have saved our cash for that BS pass interference call on Nico on 3rd down that kept the Ole Miss scoring drive alive. Oh well, always something to improve on.
you're a fricking tard if you think that wasn't pass interference.
Posted on 9/30/12 at 8:28 am to BamaELCo
Page 12 of 23
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News