Started By
Message
re: Tommy Tuberville Wants Auburn to Claim USC's Vacated 2004 NC
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:33 pm to MrAUTigers
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:33 pm to MrAUTigers
Only their last 2 games were vacated.
0
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:35 pm to MrAUTigers
quote:
SC cheated. WTFFFFFF about that don't you get?
So? Auburn cheats and its all alright?
quote:
They got caught cheating.
Oh.
quote:
USCw is not in this discussion. They lost every game that year.
SC finished the season 11-0.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:37 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
SC finished the season 11-0.
They weren't their Conf. Champions. I thought the forfeited every game Bush played in. Don't see how they got away with that. That's beside the point. You saying SC would have beaten Auburn is like you saying a one dimensional Auburn O has no shot against bama. Did you not see the roster that Chex Mix posted? That is stout!!!
This post was edited on 5/29/14 at 10:39 pm
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:37 pm to undecided
quote:I agree with this. Back then, I thought Auburn should have been in the game and I would have taken them to win had they been.
"If it'd been Michigan, if it had been Alabama, there would have been more of a push toward saying, hey they should be named No. 1. But Auburn, for some reason, we never got to first base on it. There was no support out of the administration."
summary, f#*k AU. See y'all in JHS.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:39 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
and apparently no argument can be made by Auburn fans as to how they would have beaten OU either.
We played the most difficult schedule, had the least amount of close games, had the #1 defense in the nation, had the Thorpe award winner, the SEC Offensive player of the year, 2 top 5 NFL draft pick running backs, a first round draft pick NFL QB, a future perennial All-Pro defensive tackle, four receivers with NFL careers, a pro bowl left tackle and guard...
Just because you aren't smart enough to comprehend what you read doesn't mean the argument can't and hasn't been made.
I don't know who would have won if we had played USC but your analysis is a joke.
This post was edited on 5/29/14 at 10:41 pm
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:40 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
Auburn wasn't beating SC that year,
You have nothing whatsoever to base that off of other than sheer stupidity. That's like saying AU had no chance of beating atm, uga or bama this year based off the previous year. You're full of shite and know it.
This post was edited on 5/29/14 at 10:41 pm
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:42 pm to MrAUTigers
quote:
They weren't their Conf. Champions. I thought the forfeited every game Bush played in. Don't see how they got away with that. That's beside the point. You saying SC would have beaten Auburn is like you saying a one dimensional Auburn O has no shot against bama. Did you not see the roster that Chex Mix posted? That is stout!!!
That's not stopping y'all from trying to claim 93.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:44 pm to Korin
Prove that we are trying to "claim" 93.
This post was edited on 5/29/14 at 10:45 pm
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:44 pm to Korin
quote:
That's not stopping y'all from trying to claim 93.
I don't know one single AU fan who thinks we should claim 1993. We did punk Florida though.
This post was edited on 5/29/14 at 10:45 pm
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:45 pm to MrAUTigers
And speaking of "cheating" and all, y'all already DO claim a title while getting banned from playing in a bowl game.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:45 pm to Korin
quote:
That's not stopping y'all from trying to claim 93.
Same year where they were not eligible because they were caught cheating.
Huge rocks Auburn is tossing at SC from behind their glass walls...
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:45 pm to MrAUTigers
quote:
Prove that we are trying to "claim" 93.
Is your ad good enough proof?
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:46 pm to Korin
quote:
And speaking of "cheating" and all, y'all already DO claim a title while getting banned from playing in a bowl game.
Tell UPI that.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:46 pm to MrAUTigers
Ohio State got the UPI that year.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:47 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
Same year where they were not eligible because they were caught cheating.
Huge rocks Auburn is tossing at SC from behind their glass walls...
They give Alabama hell over claiming 1964 and 73...yet they claim 1957. Glass house (s) indeed.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:47 pm to abellsujr
quote:
They were the best team that year.
Yes they were.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:47 pm to MrAUTigers
quote:
MrAUTigers
What a horrible handle.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:48 pm to mikeymike
An LSU fan that LIKES Toonces?!
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:52 pm to Korin
quote:
yet they claim 1957.
I wonder why we "claim" 1957? Looks pretty bogus now that I look at it.......
1957
*Auburn: AP, Football Research, Helms, National Championship Foundation, Poling, Williamson
Michigan State: Billingsley, Dunkel, Sagarin
*Ohio State: Boand, DeVold, FW, INS, Litkenhous,
UPI
Oklahoma: Berryman
LINK
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:53 pm to MrAUTigers
Page 5 of 9
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News