Started By
Message
re: Tommy Tuberville Wants Auburn to Claim USC's Vacated 2004 NC
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:10 pm to RandySavage
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:10 pm to RandySavage
quote:
What if I told you we played more 9 win top 15 teams that USC and OU combined?
What if I told you that SC beat VT in their backyard comfortably, while Auburn struggled to beat them in the south?
Focus on OU, SC was on a completely different level, if a vacated NC was re-awarded, it would be between Auburn and OU as neither was going to beat SC that year.
2
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:10 pm to RandySavage
quote:
What if I told you we played more 9 win top 15 teams that USC and OU combined?
People always overlook that.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:10 pm to DaleDenton
Such a stupid fricking way of looking at things. But you are Dale Denton.
Bama beats you 52-0. AU beats you 35-17. AU beats Bama and somehow you equate previous games to meaning shite...
Bama beats you 52-0. AU beats you 35-17. AU beats Bama and somehow you equate previous games to meaning shite...
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:12 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
The only time I've ever seen a lineman jumping on top of the offensive lineman on a missed PAT called a penalty. LSU vs Auburn 2004. Auburn goes on to win 7-6 with the kick. Such BS
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:12 pm to NorthGwinnettTiger
quote:
Bama beats you 52-0. AU beats you 35-17. AU beats Bama and somehow you equate previous games to meaning shite...
Has no bearing on SC beating VT comfortably, Auburn struggling against VT.
If anything it proves Auburn was in the exact place they should have been, in the Sugar Bowl playing VT not in OU's place playing SC.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:15 pm to DaleDenton
Pure bullshite. 
You can cherry pick games all you want. The truth is, Auburn played more top 25 teams than USCw and OU played combined. The reason those two played was because of the name on the front of their jersey, not their resume.
You can cherry pick games all you want. The truth is, Auburn played more top 25 teams than USCw and OU played combined. The reason those two played was because of the name on the front of their jersey, not their resume.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:17 pm to DaleDenton
Comfortably? It was 14-13 in the 4th quarter.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:17 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
What if I told you that SC beat VT in their backyard comfortably, while Auburn struggled to beat them in the south?
I would know you have no clue about what happened during the 2004 football season. Or just that you are a tard. Though it's likely both.
quote:
SC was on a completely different level
You're right one where the struggled numerous times throughout the season with average to bad teams.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:19 pm to MrAUTigers
quote:
What if I told you we played more 9 win top 15 teams that USC and OU combined? People always overlook that.
Bears repeating.
And Tommy wants to get paid.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:19 pm to MrAUTigers
quote:
The reason those two played was because of the name on the front of their jersey, not their resume.
So each failed to win their conference and had a loss or more on their record?
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:19 pm to MrAUTigers
Let's all take a second and consider the source here, fellas.
It's DaleDenton.
It's DaleDenton.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:20 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
What if I told you that SC beat VT in their backyard comfortably
I'm pretty sure that not only did this not happen, but Frank Beamer admitted that Auburn may have been the best team they played that year.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:23 pm to Ross
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:25 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
So each failed to win their conference and had a loss or more on their record?
The human polls started them #1 and #2 to start the season. The computers had Auburn #1 to end the season. The human polls weren't going to admit they were wrong.
A 6-6 UCLA almost beat USC. USCw fumbled the ball, in their red zone, late in the fourth quarter. A UCLA DB picked up the ball and had nothing but greem ahead of him and the official blew the whistle saying the USCw runner was down............replay showed he wasn't.
This post was edited on 5/29/14 at 10:26 pm
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:27 pm to MrAUTigers
Jason Campbell
Devin Aromashodu
Eric Brock
Ronnie Brown
Tim Duckworth
King Dunlap
Tyronne Green
Quentin Groves
Ben Grubbs
Will Herring
David Irons
Kenny Irons
Patrick Lee
Marcus McNeill
Anthony Mix
Ben Obomanu
Jay Ratliff
Carlos Rogers
Pat Sims
Courtney Taylor
Carnell Williams
Impressive list of NFL players on that 2004 team
Devin Aromashodu
Eric Brock
Ronnie Brown
Tim Duckworth
King Dunlap
Tyronne Green
Quentin Groves
Ben Grubbs
Will Herring
David Irons
Kenny Irons
Patrick Lee
Marcus McNeill
Anthony Mix
Ben Obomanu
Jay Ratliff
Carlos Rogers
Pat Sims
Courtney Taylor
Carnell Williams
Impressive list of NFL players on that 2004 team
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:29 pm to ChexMix
Thanks for that list! Quite impressive indeed.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:29 pm to undecided
That is golden. It has all of the elements. The whining, the delusion, but most importantly, the blatant lil brotherism. Bravo TT.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:30 pm to MrAUTigers
quote:
UCLA almost beat USC.
Its a a rivalry game, UCLA was out to ruin SC's season just like Auburn is out to ruin Bama's seasons at the end of the year.
OU and SC played for the NC, if OU wanted to claim the NC, they would have more of an argument for having been in the game. Auburn wasn't beating SC that year, and apparently no argument can be made by Auburn fans as to how they would have beaten OU either.
However, if you want to have the equivalent to Bama's 1941 NC, go ahead.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:32 pm to BZ504
quote:
The only time I've ever seen a lineman jumping on top of the offensive lineman on a missed PAT called a penalty. LSU vs Auburn 2004. Auburn goes on to win 7-6 with the kick. Such BS
Auburn won 10-9.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:32 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
Auburn wasn't beating SC that year
SC cheated. WTFFFFFF about that don't you get? They got caught cheating. USCw is not in this discussion. They lost every game that year.
......and you were one who was saying a one dimensional Auburn O had zero chance against bama. So WTF do you know?
This post was edited on 5/29/14 at 10:35 pm
Page 4 of 9
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News