Started By
Message

re: The "illegal Pass"

Posted on 9/21/15 at 7:59 am to
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
67589 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 7:59 am to
it was a legal pass with ineligible linemen down field
Posted by JaboStokes
Member since Nov 2008
1865 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 8:05 am to
quote:

it was a legal pass with ineligible linemen down field


Gets it.
Posted by Sneaky__Sally
Member since Jul 2015
12364 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 8:05 am to
Again, as I've stated before, Alabama had plenty of opportunities to win the game even after this penalty was missed.

However, if you take a moment to consider how db's read and react this type of play, you will see that it has a very large impact because the lineman moving downfield is the key that db's are supposed to read to move up in run support and leave the WR open downfield. The penalty has come up a number of times (as a missed call) in recent years. It isn't a judgement call but simply looking at where a player is in relation to the LOS. It seems to be a simple fix by having a dedicated ref looking at that area. I don't know why we would want to avoid fixing a penalty is often missed and easily corrected.

The official would also be able to call facemask's (which really very rarely cause a player to fumble if we are honest with ourselves) as well as help determine if a player intends to bat the ball upwards or forward on an onsides kick return.
This post was edited on 9/21/15 at 8:07 am
Posted by Patton
Principality of Sealand
Member since Apr 2011
32652 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 8:07 am to
Jesus rebel fans are salty in this thread. Yea there was a blown call last year on the face mask. You still won. Congrats. Yes there were several blown calls this year. You still won. Can't we just have an honest discussion about them without getting so defensive? I don't think anyone in here is claiming the pass is what lost Bama the game. It's just a rule that was supposed to be looked for closer and was missed.
Posted by JustGetItRight
Member since Jan 2012
15712 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 8:11 am to
quote:

Batting the ball on an onsides kick is illegal, and that was clearly done by the 'Bama 'good hands' team. And they got a TD out of it. So, it evened things out. Pop pass= Ole Miss TD; Batting the ball='Bama TD. Take those two away, and Ole Miss still wins the game.


I have no problem at all with this viewpoint.

IMO, what we saw throughout the game was just another example of the same shait-tastic SEC officiating we see every week.

They aren't biased, they're just bad.

Posted by EC Reb
Member since Sep 2012
647 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 8:11 am to
quote:

quote: Crying about a penalty that had little to no effect on the play is desperate Not here to bitch, but WTF? The lineman down the field has everything to do with the play. That is how the corner reads if it is a pass or run play and knows whether to abandon the receiver and go after the QB.


Your corner that was covering Core was looking at Kelly when he left his man. Wipe those tears away you silly bitch.
Posted by Patton
Principality of Sealand
Member since Apr 2011
32652 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 8:13 am to
That doesn't even matter. The corner could have been doing the Cupid shuffle but that doesn't change the ineligible receiver downfield
This post was edited on 9/21/15 at 8:14 am
Posted by SquirrelyBama
Member since Nov 2011
6389 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 8:14 am to
In today's game, Offense -vs- -Defense is like watching a fight between someone who's the arms are tied behind their backs -vs- some who can use both arms. Than calling it a fair fight......

Should be ball past line of scrimmage.
Shouldn't have linemen past 1 yard on pass plays.

But what should be done and what' done is sometimes skewed by human nature, bias, greed, and things like this. Ratings/money rule the day, and high scoring games is what's selling for most. Plus, not every program can get elite defenders, but they can do this offensive style of play though. Makes for much more parity across the nation. More people interested = Higher ratings. If a few defesive bodies pile up along the way, it's seen has acceptable collateral damage. It's amazing defenses stop offenses at all anymore, to tell you the truth. One of the only ways to combat this, is jump on the offensive "Our offense has got the advantage train" In other words, do these tactics too.
Posted by ohsfan281
Member since Sep 2015
149 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 8:14 am to
You can't review missed penalties unless you want to review all missed penalties. That would be ridiculous. Why should illegal man down field be reviewed any more than holding or pass interference should be reviewed ?

Alabama fans should just shut up and get over it. God knows you have benefitted from enough bad calls by the referees over the years. If you go back and.look at the auburn game all you fricktards complain about, bammer benefitted from the referees missing a block in the back in that very same game
Posted by SouthOfHere
Pascagoula, Ms
Member since Feb 2013
1921 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 8:14 am to
quote:

People are upset about the lineman/ineligible receiver downfield, not the quarterback. Its over and we had plenty of other opportunities to execute and win the game, but you don't know what you are talking about.


That wasn't illegal either. The analysts in the LSU game explained why. The rule needs changing but it is not illegal in that instance.
Posted by 3nOut
Central Texas, TX
Member since Jan 2013
28859 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 8:15 am to
quote:

Crying about a penalty that had little to no effect on the play is desperate




i for one don't mind it.

Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 8:15 am to
quote:

last year I didn't see this many Bama fans crying about the missed facemask call that gave them 7 points


Why would we cry about it? We benefited from it. Many did say it was missed and was BS.
Posted by Nissanmaxima
Member since Feb 2006
14928 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 8:17 am to
I really don't understand how that rule could not be if the ball is released beyond the line of scrimmage would then be a penalty. That just to me would make more sense.
Posted by DannyB
Bagram, Afghanistan
Member since Aug 2010
6141 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 8:19 am to
I think college should go to how it is in the NFL. If it has no direct impact on the play then it is not a penalty. They never call holding or anything else in the NFL on the backside of a play.

That lineman being 5 yards downfield had absolutely no impact on that play. The corner came off of his man to tackle the QB. The DB's were not watching the linemen to see how to react to the play, they were doing what DB's always do; their eyes were on the QB.
Posted by stat19
Member since Feb 2011
29350 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 8:20 am to
quote:

sewaneerebel


Dude, don't be that fan - enjoy your win.
Posted by Cruiserhog
Little Rock
Member since Apr 2008
10460 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 8:20 am to
quote:

Crying about a penalty that had little to no effect on the play is desperate


not understanding why the rule is in place and commenting on it is a sign of arrogance and stupidity.

the defense players read keys and when a lineman leaves the line of scrimmage the key is run not pass so the safeties come up

so you ignorantly put it "it had little effect on the play" when in reality it quite possibly allowed it to happen.
Posted by Sneaky__Sally
Member since Jul 2015
12364 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 8:20 am to
Can you explain why? I'm just curious because the announcers seemed to think it was illegal during the game on Saturday night
Posted by GregAl
Mobile
Member since Aug 2014
3659 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 8:22 am to


I saw this photo in another thread. Looks over the los to me. (the ball, not the QB)
This post was edited on 9/21/15 at 8:25 am
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
50392 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 8:23 am to
quote:

batting the ball on an onsides kick is illegal, and that was clearly done by the 'Bama 'good hands' team.


Batting the ball isn't illegal, but intentionally batting it forward is illegal.

However, the tipping of the ball on the onside kick was a reviewable play. It was almost a minute later before Bama snapped the ball and the replay officials didn't blow it dead. I think it's safe to say they couldn't determine if he intended to bat the ball forward or was trying to one hand snag it or bat it somewhere else (only intentionally batting it forward is illegal). It didn't look intentional to me, and it obviously didn't look that way to the officials on the field or in the booth, but I'm sure others will disagree.
This post was edited on 9/21/15 at 8:24 am
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 8:24 am to
Has anyone complained about that call, alter? All I've seen is people pointing out that the lineman was blocking 6 yards down field. I can see why an LSU fan would be crying, though.
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 14
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter