Started By
Message
re: Texas- Texas A&M rivalry
Posted on 10/21/15 at 8:43 am to SCgamecock2988
Posted on 10/21/15 at 8:43 am to SCgamecock2988
quote:
It's fAggies, get it right.
Midnight gay orgy yell...your statehouse...2016...IT'S COMING AGAIN!!!
1
Posted on 10/21/15 at 8:50 am to CGSC Lobotomy
Lots of Aggie butthurt and filled with classic melts.
Great thread
Great thread
Posted on 10/21/15 at 8:51 am to sullivanct19a
quote:
Texas is poised to go on a decline.
Teams like Nebraska, Michigan, USC, Miami, etc are always poised for a long decline because they are lacking factors to stay consistent:
Nebraska, Michigan(and others): Location sucks
USC, Miami, etc: No real consistent fan base
Texas has every factor and all they need is the right coach to turn it around in one season(Harbaugh, etc)
Posted on 10/21/15 at 9:01 am to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
2012 (tied for 2nd in Division - ranked 2nd out of SEC teams in final polls)
2010 (tied for 1st in Division - beat both participants in the Big 12 title game)
Nice try
No one gives a shite where you finished in your division - when is the last time someone other than an Aggie referenced their division finish?
In 2010 Aggie didn't play in the CCG (though its a neat trick that they put that one on their wall in 2012). It really is a feat how far Texas A&M will go to create accomplishments out of thin air. Trying to impress your new SEC brethren I guess
So when is the last time Texas A&M finished better than third in their conference?
Posted on 10/21/15 at 9:11 am to SamuelClemens
quote:
So when they finally do start playing again
Posted on 10/21/15 at 9:13 am to Rhino5
quote:and an OP full of response and anger
6 pages of this thread are Aggies denying the ATM/ UT rivalry, and several even claimed all-male school status to soften the historical arse pounding given by Texas. Did you read?
Posted on 10/21/15 at 9:17 am to WestCoastAg
A&M accomplished a lot in the BDF. Maybe you should check our athletics site. Multiple division titles, a huge conference title win in 1998, and beating #1 ranked Oklahoma in 2002.
Posted on 10/21/15 at 9:24 am to BurlesonCountyAg
They accomplished things in the Big12 but pretty much underachieved.
They are poised to be much more successful in the SEC.
And "poised" is better than not being "poised".
Not much more to say than that.
They are poised to be much more successful in the SEC.
And "poised" is better than not being "poised".
Not much more to say than that.
Posted on 10/21/15 at 9:32 am to Rhino5
Good Lord!
What is the OP's point? To troll A&M?
OP needs to go back to the trailer and fry something.
What is the OP's point? To troll A&M?
OP needs to go back to the trailer and fry something.
Posted on 10/21/15 at 9:34 am to BurlesonCountyAg
Not to mention a Natty in women's hoops and numerous Nattys in track and field.
But, yup. We didn't accomplish anything because we were down in football for about twelve years.
But, yup. We didn't accomplish anything because we were down in football for about twelve years.
Posted on 10/21/15 at 9:40 am to The Balinese Club
if you look at athletic accomplishments of the past couple decades A&M is every bit the equal of tu.
Posted on 10/21/15 at 9:45 am to Rhino5
Don't forget all those fake titles they stole when they left daddys house!
Posted on 10/21/15 at 9:48 am to BurlesonCountyAg
quote:
if you look at athletic accomplishments of the past couple decades A&M is every bit the equal of tu.
Overall, sure. But not even in the big three, even with Texas' big decline (in the last two decades).
And Texas has scoreboard on you all in all the big three sports, most recent matches.
But overall/allsports, everyone is Stanford's bitch.
I'd put money on A&M being more successful than Texas in the big three sports over the next couple of years. But not sure beyond that.
This post was edited on 10/21/15 at 9:49 am
Posted on 10/21/15 at 9:50 am to oman
Why is it any thread calling out atm gets the anchor on this forum? Mods are out of control
Posted on 10/21/15 at 10:08 am to Boomer00
quote:
Don't forget all those fake titles they stole when they left daddys house!
While your t-shirt team lost to a 1-4 team led by a midget wrestler who, when he speaks, makes Mushmouth sound understandable.
Posted on 10/21/15 at 10:09 am to dallastiger55
quote:Between 1900 and the start of WW2, the series was basically a dead heat, and the two schools were much closer to being the same size than during the forty subsequent years, when the 'Horns dominated the series. In 1939, for instance, TAMU had about 6,000 students, compared to about 10,000 in Austin.
They always say "but,but we were an all male school and that period doesn't count, and since 1984 it's close to .500"
Yeah so I guess your 1 NC in 1939 doesn't count then
After WW2, the University of Texas simply grew faster. By 1965, it had grown to the point that its enrollment was almost twice that at TAMU ... 26,000 to 14,000 students.
The two were not comparable in size until the 1980s.
But TCU is tiny, and they are Top-10. So, the Aggies have sucked forever and will never improve.
Posted on 10/21/15 at 10:37 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Between 1900 and the start of WW2, the series was basically a dead heat, and the two schools were much closer to being the same size than during the forty subsequent years, when the 'Horns dominated the series
22-15 for that period, but if you just make it simple and take the rivalry from the start, it's 26-15, excluding ties.
If you want to manipulate the numbers, you can say that the schools were evenly matched between the world wars.
Page 8 of 8
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News