Started By
Message
re: Stevan Ridley vs Mark ingram in the pros
Posted on 12/2/12 at 4:31 pm to Crimson Legend
Posted on 12/2/12 at 4:31 pm to Crimson Legend
quote:
Yes. All great college players must immediately play well in the NFL, or they were overrated.
While there is no doubt Mark is a great football player, he should have at least shown something this year that leads us to believe he's an NFL caliber 1st stringer.
As of right now, Stevan Ridley has shown that and Ingram has not. It's not an LSU back vs Bama back thing, as Richardson has been tearing shite up..it's just one of those strange things
0
Posted on 12/2/12 at 4:31 pm to Schwaaz
quote:
Sucks to be a running back for the Saints.
Pierre Thomas and Chris Ivory say hey.
Mark Ingram is mother fricking garbage.
Posted on 12/2/12 at 4:31 pm to PP7 for heisman
Thoughtful thread. Would read in another life.
Posted on 12/2/12 at 4:31 pm to LSUNV
quote:
Saints are terrible at run blocking, awesome pass blockers but suck arse as run blockers
They seem fine with Ivory and Thomas in the game.
Posted on 12/2/12 at 4:32 pm to Alabama Slim
quote:
maybe if the saints would use him in some other way, besides as a human battering ram
Chris Ivory is a beast being used like this. So you are saying Ivory is better than Ingram?
Posted on 12/2/12 at 4:32 pm to LSUbase13
quote:
Pierre and Ivory do just fine? Maybe if he'd get off the Alabama sidelines like Uncle Rico and hit the weight room, he'd do a little better. What a wasted pick.
Don't even act like Pierre and Ivory are used like Ingram is. For a few games we used him right, then we went back to just bringing him into to run it straight ahead into bad blocking. When it's obvious he's only in the game to run he can't do shite about it. He needs to be out there for multiple plays, gotta go PA, gotta throw it to him, gotta let him block, etc. When he's just gonna run the D will always stop him.
Posted on 12/2/12 at 4:33 pm to PP7 for heisman
Wrong board
Posted on 12/2/12 at 4:33 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
quote:
Saints don't use MI right, and he isn't the type of back that will succeed by sharing carries. He needs to go somewhere other than NOLA where he can be used right, or we just need to start making him the main back if we really want production out of him.
Yeah, it's one of the top offenses in the NFL's fault for not using him right.
Maybe he's not doing something right. Posted on 12/2/12 at 4:33 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
quote:
Don't even act like Pierre and Ivory are used like Ingram is. For a few games we used him right, then we went back to just bringing him into to run it straight ahead into bad blocking. When it's obvious he's only in the game to run he can't do shite about it. He needs to be out there for multiple plays, gotta go PA, gotta throw it to him, gotta let him block, etc. When he's just gonna run the D will always stop him.
So its all a conspiracy by the Saints coaches to make Ingram a failure?
Posted on 12/2/12 at 4:34 pm to wildtigercat93
quote:
They seem fine with Ivory and Thomas in the game.
what's their record again?
Posted on 12/2/12 at 4:34 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
quote:
otta go PA, gotta throw it to him, gotta let him block, etc.
Do you freaking watch the games???? He can't catch. He SUCKS at run blocking.
Posted on 12/2/12 at 4:34 pm to wildtigercat93
Watch the saints run blocking, shifty backs never do well with the Saints, backs like Thomas and Ivory would do that any where. If we had a good run blocking scheme Ingram would do just fine.
Posted on 12/2/12 at 4:34 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
Oh like when drew threw it to him on a screen last week and he fricking fell down on his own when it was a sure TD?
He's fricking terrible.
He's fricking terrible.
This post was edited on 12/2/12 at 4:37 pm
Posted on 12/2/12 at 4:34 pm to Schwaaz
quote:
Sucks to be a running back for the Saints.
Pierre Thomas = 4.8 ypc
Chris Ivory = 5.4 ypc
Darren Sproles = 4.5 ypc
Mark Ingram = LoL ypc
Seems like only 1 guy having issues being a RB with the Saints.
Posted on 12/2/12 at 4:34 pm to Alabama Slim
quote:
what's their record again?
Same as Ingrams because theyre both on the same team, i dont see your point
Posted on 12/2/12 at 4:34 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
quote:
Don't even act like Pierre and Ivory are used like Ingram is. For a few games we used him right, then we went back to just bringing him into to run it straight ahead into bad blocking. When it's obvious he's only in the game to run he can't do shite about it. He needs to be out there for multiple plays, gotta go PA, gotta throw it to him, gotta let him block, etc. When he's just gonna run the D will always stop him.
He said, while wearing his tin foil hat.
Beanie Wells part II so far
Posted on 12/2/12 at 4:35 pm to LSUNV
quote:
Watch the saints run blocking, shifty backs never do well with the Saints, backs like Thomas and Ivory would do that any where. If we had a good run blocking scheme Ingram would do just fine.
That makes no sense. Thats just an awful excuse for Ingram
Posted on 12/2/12 at 4:36 pm to hg
There is an easy answer to this. Stevan Ridley doesn't waste all his game energy jumping up and down repeatedly and bumping chests with college players like Mark Ingram does every Saturday. By Sunday, Ingram is wiped out.
Posted on 12/2/12 at 4:37 pm to wildtigercat93
So the excuse Bama homers are rolling with is the Saints OL blocks for all their other RBs but not for Ingram.
Seems solid enough
Seems solid enough
Posted on 12/2/12 at 4:37 pm to wildtigercat93
Saints are a pass first Team, what doesn't make sense, our run blocking sucks regardless
Page 2 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News