Started By
Message

re: So much for the 2012 Johnny being a fluke

Posted on 11/13/13 at 9:35 am to
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
94954 posts
Posted on 11/13/13 at 9:35 am to
quote:

Yes, he was lucky it was completed. Yes, it was a brilliant play.
Exactly. Yes luck was involved. But so was an extreme amount of skill to avoid the sack and a heads up play to know the situation.
Posted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Member since Sep 2013
21146 posts
Posted on 11/13/13 at 9:36 am to
Interpolate all you want, that play was a 'fluke' if there ever was one. Smart? I don't think so. ''What's the worst that can happen? Bama returns it? Psha, phooey with that.''
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84065 posts
Posted on 11/13/13 at 9:36 am to
quote:

You said, "How can you call it anything but lucky" Well, i call it smart and lucky. Get it?


He could have gained a few yards to get a FG, it could have been pic 6'ed. There was nothing smart about it.

Hindsight of the outcome allows you to call it smart now.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
94954 posts
Posted on 11/13/13 at 9:37 am to
quote:

A lucky lob into the air while falling down is not
What about the first part of the play where he somehow avoids a sure sack, then the second part where he throws it 40+ yards off his back foot? That took an unreal amount of athleticism. The play involved luck and brilliance
Posted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Member since Sep 2013
21146 posts
Posted on 11/13/13 at 9:37 am to
quote:

He could have gained a few yards to get a FG, it could have been pic 6'ed


This right here. The thing is: If that play had been unsuccessful NONE of you would be claiming it was skill. All of you would be saying: Well that's what happens when you throw it late down the middle off of your back foot while falling down.
This post was edited on 11/13/13 at 9:39 am
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
94954 posts
Posted on 11/13/13 at 9:38 am to
quote:

Interpolate all you want, that play was a 'fluke' if there ever was one. Smart? I don't think so. ''What's the worst that can happen? Bama returns it? Psha, phooey with that.''
They could return a punt for a td as well. It is common football knowledge that throwing the ball deep downfield on third down is a smart play.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84065 posts
Posted on 11/13/13 at 9:38 am to
quote:

What about the first part of the play where he somehow avoids a sure sack


Doesn't matter, throwing it up for grabs that close to FG range and risking an INT is not smart.

quote:

The play involved luck and brilliance


You got that half right. You can't use hindsight to call it brilliant. It was lucky. That's it.

I'm not saying JFF isn't great, but that play isn't a great demonstration of his brilliance.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
94954 posts
Posted on 11/13/13 at 9:40 am to
quote:

I'm not saying JFF isn't great, but that play isn't a great demonstration of his brilliance.
Are you ignoring the first half of the play where he avoided a sack for a loss of 10+ yards?
Posted by Projectpat
Houston, TX
Member since Sep 2011
10521 posts
Posted on 11/13/13 at 9:40 am to
quote:

StrawsDrawnAtRandom


There's a difference between a QB who's in sync with his receivers, knows what they can do, and gives them an opportunity to perform and a QB who's just throwing up prayers hoping receivers will "bail him out."

Someday when your team has a half decent QB again, you might realize that.
Posted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Member since Sep 2013
21146 posts
Posted on 11/13/13 at 9:41 am to
There's a lot less control in an interception than there is in a punt.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84065 posts
Posted on 11/13/13 at 9:41 am to
quote:

Are you ignoring the first half of the play where he avoided a sack for a loss of 10+ yards?


The important part of that play is the completion. The throw being completed was 100% luck. How are you not getting this?
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
94954 posts
Posted on 11/13/13 at 9:42 am to
quote:

There's a difference between a QB who's in sync with his receivers, knows what they can do, and gives them an opportunity to perform and a QB who's just throwing up prayers hoping receivers will "bail him out."
Exactly. We have the same situation with Mett and Landry. It isn't a bail out when it keeps happening over and over and over
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84065 posts
Posted on 11/13/13 at 9:42 am to
quote:

There's a difference between a QB who's in sync with his receivers, knows what they can do, and gives them an opportunity to perform and a QB who's just throwing up prayers hoping receivers will "bail him out."


You cannot say on that play JFF knew his receiver would come down with that. Come on.
Posted by Projectpat
Houston, TX
Member since Sep 2011
10521 posts
Posted on 11/13/13 at 9:42 am to
quote:

Doesn't matter, throwing it up for grabs that close to FG range and risking an INT is not smart.


After he completes one of these on you next week and crushes your team's hopes and dreams, at least you can sit there in your recliner and talk about how much smarter you are than him.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
94954 posts
Posted on 11/13/13 at 9:43 am to
quote:

The important part of that play is the completion
He avoided a twenty yard sack that would have completely put them out of fg range. But yeh, thats not important
Posted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Member since Sep 2013
21146 posts
Posted on 11/13/13 at 9:43 am to
quote:

Someday when your team has a half decent QB again, you might realize that.


Kind of hilarious that Driskel beat you guys last year in your house.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84065 posts
Posted on 11/13/13 at 9:43 am to
quote:

Exactly. We have the same situation with Mett and Landry. It isn't a bail out when it keeps happening over and over and over


If Mett made that same kind of throw to Landry with that many defenders around, I'd be the first to tell you it was nothing other than dumb luck.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84065 posts
Posted on 11/13/13 at 9:44 am to
quote:

He avoided a twenty yard sack that would have completely put them out of fg range. But yeh, thats not important



You're clearly an idiot. You're never going to get it.
Posted by Projectpat
Houston, TX
Member since Sep 2011
10521 posts
Posted on 11/13/13 at 9:45 am to
quote:

You cannot say on that play JFF knew his receiver would come down with that. Come on.


I understand that your years of watching Mett, JJ, and Lee makes throws like that seem like the worst idea ever, but after watching Johnny complete those passes time after time after time after time...calling it luck just makes you look stupid.
Posted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Member since Sep 2013
21146 posts
Posted on 11/13/13 at 9:45 am to
quote:

He avoided a twenty yard sack that would have completely put them out of fg range. But yeh, thats not important


Could have also thrown it away and not risked anything. Like he's been saying: You're using hindsight to justify the pass when if he hadn't and it had been returned for a touchdown (pic six) you would not be saying the same thing.

''Pic six aside, that was a good decision.'' Lol.
Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter