Started By
Message
re: So much for the 2012 Johnny being a fluke
Posted on 11/13/13 at 9:45 am to Projectpat
Posted on 11/13/13 at 9:45 am to Projectpat
quote:
After he completes one of these on you next week and crushes your team's hopes and dreams, at least you can sit there in your recliner and talk about how much smarter you are than him.
You're right JFF can do zero wrong and knew exactly what he was doing on that play. No luck involved. 
1
Posted on 11/13/13 at 9:45 am to StrawsDrawnAtRandom
quote:
Kind of hilarious that Driskel beat you guys last year in your house.
Yup, Driskel was the one who beat A&M last year.
Posted on 11/13/13 at 9:45 am to LNCHBOX
quote:You are the idiot. The play involved both an extreme amount of skill and luck. Any qb besides JFF and their team is punting from the 50
You're clearly an idiot. You're never going to get it.
Posted on 11/13/13 at 9:46 am to Projectpat
quote:
Yup, Driskel was the one who beat A&M last year.
Why are you laughing? Yall lost to that guy.
Posted on 11/13/13 at 9:46 am to LNCHBOX
quote:You're a dumbass. We have all said luck was involved. But skill was as well.
No luck involved.
Posted on 11/13/13 at 9:47 am to Projectpat
quote:
Yup, Driskel was the one who beat A&M last year.
Driskel actually did win that game last season. No mistakes, made two crucial 3rd down conversions with his feet and his arm (that led to us winning). That must sting like a motherfricker.
Posted on 11/13/13 at 9:47 am to StrawsDrawnAtRandom
quote:
You're using hindsight to justify the pass when if he hadn't and it had been returned for a touchdown (pic six) you would not be saying the same thing.
You're right, if only the outcome was the complete opposite, it would have been a bad decision.
Good Lord you two are morons.
Posted on 11/13/13 at 9:47 am to lsupride87
quote:
You are the idiot.
Good one.
quote:
The play involved both an extreme amount of skill and luck.
And I've been talking about the catch the whole fricking time. Reading is your friend.
quote:
Any qb besides JFF and their team is punting from the 50
Nothing like the hindsight argument. Well he caught it that one time, so that will happen everytime he lobs one up for grabs against Bama.
Posted on 11/13/13 at 9:48 am to lsupride87
quote:
We have all said luck was involved. But skill was as well.
You're not saying it's lucky though. You're saying he's done it so often that it can only be skill and how they're all on the same wavelength and hippy bullshite like that.
Posted on 11/13/13 at 9:48 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
Why are you laughing? Yall lost to that guy.
You don't understand basic reading comprehension, so that's why I'm laughing again.
Posted on 11/13/13 at 9:48 am to Projectpat
quote:
You're right, if only the outcome was the complete opposite, it would have been a bad decision.
It was a bad decision regardless. He was LUCKY it worked.
quote:
Good Lord you two are morons
Interesting considering you can't see that catch was nothing other than lucky.
Posted on 11/13/13 at 9:49 am to LNCHBOX
quote:No, you have been saying the whole play involved only luck and nothing else. I have pointed out that there was both luck and skill that allowed that play to happen.
And I've been talking about the catch the whole fricking time. Reading is your friend.
Posted on 11/13/13 at 9:49 am to Projectpat
quote:
You don't understand basic reading comprehension
Did you or did you not lose to Driskel? He led the team that beat you, regardless of how he played. Nice try genius.
Posted on 11/13/13 at 9:50 am to lsupride87
quote:
No, you have been saying the whole play involved only luck and nothing else
The scramble means nothing without the lucky catch. For frick's sake, how dense are you?
Posted on 11/13/13 at 9:51 am to LNCHBOX
quote:Yes it does. If it goes incomplete they still haven't lost twenty yards and are in fg range. How dense are you?
The scramble means nothing without the lucky catch
Posted on 11/13/13 at 9:51 am to LNCHBOX
Why are you arguing this?
Manziel' success shouldn't be any skin off your nose; yet you seem hellbent to stick to your guns. Just curious about the rationale.
Manziel' success shouldn't be any skin off your nose; yet you seem hellbent to stick to your guns. Just curious about the rationale.
Posted on 11/13/13 at 9:52 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
The scramble means nothing without the lucky catch. For frick's sake, how dense are you?
I think we've said this about ten times now: The scramble was great, getting away was a good thing. Throwing into multiple defenders, across your body, down the middle of the field, off of your back foot and super late...
Is nothing but luck. That throw was completely lucky, he didn't even know if his receiver was there, just assumed.
Posted on 11/13/13 at 9:53 am to lsupride87
quote:
Yes it does.
No it doesn't. Without the catch it is a forgotten play (unless it get's picked of course).
quote:
If it goes incomplete they still haven't lost twenty yards and are in fg range
Could have been picked. Again, using hindsight doesn't make it a smart play.
quote:
How dense are you?
Repeating me isn't making you look any smarter.
Posted on 11/13/13 at 9:53 am to LNCHBOX
JFF is lucky yes be he is also very very good. Does he make a bad decision on occasion? Yes and you would too knowing that you must score. Could any other qb in the nation have the Aggies at 8 and 2? No. Could JFF have any of the undefeated still undefeated? Yes. Whether you like him or not you gotta admit he is great not just lucky.
Posted on 11/13/13 at 9:53 am to StrawsDrawnAtRandom
quote:So you admit the play included both skill and luck?
I think we've said this about ten times now: The scramble was great, getting away was a good thing. Throwing into multiple defenders, across your body, down the middle of the field, off of your back foot and super late...
Is nothing but luck. That throw was completely lucky, he didn't even know if his receiver was there, just assumed
Page 6 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News