Started By
Message
re: SEC QB rankings going into 2012
Posted on 6/24/12 at 1:48 pm to TTsTowel
Posted on 6/24/12 at 1:48 pm to TTsTowel
I'm sorry but you can't just rate people by stats it doesn't work that way. You have to have potential, athleticism , intangibles, etc.
Like I said the 4-7 QB's are most likely interchangeable. Honestly I don't see what's wrong with McCarron being in that list. Heck being in the top 10 QB's in the SEC is better than half of the other QB's in the nation.
Like I said the 4-7 QB's are most likely interchangeable. Honestly I don't see what's wrong with McCarron being in that list. Heck being in the top 10 QB's in the SEC is better than half of the other QB's in the nation.
Posted on 6/24/12 at 1:48 pm to Alahunter
My top five:
1. Wilson
2. Murray
3. Braysus
4. Shaw
5. McCarron
1. Wilson
2. Murray
3. Braysus
4. Shaw
5. McCarron
Posted on 6/24/12 at 1:49 pm to TT9
The only dumbarse around here is you, yo.
Posted on 6/24/12 at 1:50 pm to ChargerDog91
quote:that's all we have to go on at the current time on some of the QB's though,and i want a QB that's proven as opposed to one that isn't.
I'm sorry but you can't just rate people by stats it doesn't work that way
Posted on 6/24/12 at 1:51 pm to TT9
The NFL doesn't rate on stats alone or proven capability or Timmy Chang would have been a first round draft pick
Posted on 6/24/12 at 1:51 pm to TT9
quote:
that's all we have to go on at the current time on some of the QB's though,and i want a QB that's proven as opposed to one that isn't.
And yet you think the list is spot on having Mett above Franklin?
eta: and the rest of the QBs that have started
This post was edited on 6/24/12 at 1:53 pm
Posted on 6/24/12 at 1:52 pm to ChargerDog91
says the guy who says State's wr's are better than Tennessee's,you and Towell are a perfect tandum.
Posted on 6/24/12 at 1:52 pm to TTsTowel
quote:
but I wonder if he could take the beating if he tried.
I read an article earlier where he said he never had to hook slide, something the coaches are teaching him now. I'm thinking the hook/slide might be the difference in him finishing season or not.
Posted on 6/24/12 at 1:52 pm to ChargerDog91
quote:this was an SEC list,not an NFL scout list,geez.
The NFL doesn't rate on stats alone or proven capability or Timmy Chang would have been a first round draft pick
Posted on 6/24/12 at 1:53 pm to 870Hog
quote:that was a troll,i saw A Mac at 3 and made the post.
And yet you think the list is spot on having Mett above Franklin?
Posted on 6/24/12 at 1:54 pm to TT9
Nice try and misconstruing my words. I said I would take them over them, not that they were better. The only one I would take would be Hunter. They can keep Rogers.
Posted on 6/24/12 at 1:55 pm to 870Hog
quote:
And yet you think the list is spot on having Mett above Franklin?
Mettsiah will throw for 4000 yards and rain destruction upon all opponents.
I still have my CWS Hoghat on...how am I doing?
Posted on 6/24/12 at 1:56 pm to Alahunter
quote:
6 Zach Mettenberger
quote:
7 James Franklin
Wow. Just wow.
Posted on 6/24/12 at 1:57 pm to TT9
Yes a SEC list of the top QB's. And some people rated their QB's with potential over stats. Stats aren't everything bruh. That's the point.
It's a not an by the way. An Only comes before vowels. Or is that Bammer education coming out?
quote:
an SEC
It's a not an by the way. An Only comes before vowels. Or is that Bammer education coming out?
Posted on 6/24/12 at 1:58 pm to TT9
Our WR's have potential. They are smaller, but shifty and fast. Now that we actually have a decent QB behind the line throwing to them, you will see the real potential.
Posted on 6/24/12 at 1:59 pm to ChargerDog91
so you're gunna take potential over wr's that are proven? well two of them anyway.
This post was edited on 6/24/12 at 2:01 pm
Posted on 6/24/12 at 1:59 pm to 870Hog
I'm not here to argue Shaw above Mccaron. Just wanna remind folks he didn't start every game.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News