Started By
Message
re: SEC Football Teams All Time Historical Rankings according to CFB Warehouse
Posted on 8/1/15 at 10:13 pm to mightysooner
Posted on 8/1/15 at 10:13 pm to mightysooner
You realize no one gives a single flying frick about Oklahoma, the state, university or football team correct?
Literally worse than anything Alabama or Mississippi has to offer.
OU's death blow was A&M to the SEC & that Cotton Bowl loss. Now you and Texas spend your time getting beat up by small private Christian schools
41-13 bitch
Big game bob shite his pants
Literally worse than anything Alabama or Mississippi has to offer.
OU's death blow was A&M to the SEC & that Cotton Bowl loss. Now you and Texas spend your time getting beat up by small private Christian schools
41-13 bitch
Big game bob shite his pants
2
Posted on 8/1/15 at 10:19 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:Actually, we were only one spot higher before 2000 on their list dumb shite.
SEC Football Teams All Time Historical Rankings according to CFB Warehouse If we're talking all-time, I dont see how you put LSU over Tennessee. The overwhelming majority of LSU's football accomplishments have occurred in the last 15 years. Before 2000 they would fall around 5th-6th on this list, the program was pretty meh for about a quarter century before Saban arrived. Arkansas should probably switch with A&M if I'm being honest, they and Texas pretty much dominated the SWC during the 60s, 70s and early 80s before A&M and SMU had their big runs. I didnt realize USC was that terrible all-time but after looking it, Jesus H Christ. I'd have killed myself long before Spurrier got there. Georgia has been Florida's bitch for 25 years now.
Posted on 8/1/15 at 10:21 pm to UTodd98
quote:. Hahahahah. What? We went from #10 on the list before 2000 to #9
LSU's program was a pile of dog shite before Saban.
Posted on 8/1/15 at 10:33 pm to PAGator
quote:
Not as political as President Nixon personally declaring Texas the National Champion
Before inviting Notre Dame, the Cotton Bowl invited Penn State, but they refused, so frick them.
Posted on 8/1/15 at 10:40 pm to UTodd98
quote:
LSU can't hold Auburn or UGA's jock historically much less UT's.
Solid butt hurt
Continue on with your decade + of suckage
Posted on 8/1/15 at 10:42 pm to redeye
quote:
Before inviting Notre Dame, the Cotton Bowl invited Penn State, but they refused, so frick them.
Supposedly because the players voted to be in Miami over Dallas.
Posted on 8/1/15 at 10:42 pm to redeye
quote:
Alabama won 2 national titles that decade, despite having a worse record then Arkansas both times. The CFBDW gave Alabama 100 points for those titles and Arkansas received 15 for sharing it with them one year. Lot's of injustices back then and we had more then our fair share, also.
Don't you wish that Alabama had accepted the AP and UPI and FWAA in '64 and then turned around and told them all that they didn't accept their validity as polling services. Then Alabama could have bestowed their trophies upon Arkansas.
That would have showed the AP and the UPI that Alabama didn't agree with the bourgeois, and long practiced, system of giving out trophies before bowl games.
Alabama could have taught the nation that they knew better than the AP and the UPI and they they didn't play by the rules because rules were for punks and sissies.
And, most importantly, Arkansas would have those trophies now. I mean, the trophies wouldn't have been legit because Arkansas would have had to change the rules that everyone played by in order to have actually won them themselves. But still, Arky fans would have a couple of very beautiful trophies.
It would be kind of like Ohio State giving their recent trophies to whatever team is the first team to win a NC after the playoffs are changed to eight teams, instead of four. Because, quite frankly, Ohio State's recent NC will no longer be legitimate at that point.
This post was edited on 8/1/15 at 10:47 pm
Posted on 8/1/15 at 10:50 pm to redeye
Penn State hadn't lost a game since October of 1967. In December of 1969, we should've been able to play anywhere and win the NC
Posted on 8/1/15 at 10:53 pm to Manzielathon
quote:
You realize no one gives a single flying frick about Oklahoma, the state, university or football team correct?
Literally worse than anything Alabama or Mississippi has to offer.
OU's death blow was A&M to the SEC & that Cotton Bowl loss. Now you and Texas spend your time getting beat up by small private Christian schools
41-13 bitch
Big game bob shite his pants
You're the 4th best team in your own state "after you went to the SEC". When you "left for the SEC" you were the second best team in your state. What happened?
Death blow? We're just fine. We've been a major program for decades and we'll be here long after your fake swag novelty wears off due to lack of results on the field.
This post was edited on 8/1/15 at 11:10 pm
Posted on 8/1/15 at 10:56 pm to Korin
quote:
Supposedly because the players voted to be in Miami over Dallas.
So what did Paterno have to complain about? The AP poll didn't award it's champion until after the bowl and Paterno had a chance to beat Texas, but his players refused? I never understood that.
Posted on 8/1/15 at 10:58 pm to redeye
Joe respected his players' wishes. He viewed it as their reward for the great season and allowed them to pick
Posted on 8/1/15 at 11:02 pm to PAGator
quote:
Penn State hadn't lost a game since October of 1967. In December of 1969, we should've been able to play anywhere and win the NC
Very similar to Arkansas in '65, when we finished on a 22-game win streak. I see your argument, and in all honesty, I think the networks setup things up for Arkansas and Texas to be ranked 1-2 at the end of the season in '69.
This post was edited on 8/1/15 at 11:04 pm
Posted on 8/1/15 at 11:06 pm to redeye
quote:
I think the networks setup things up for Arkansas and Texas to be ranked 1-2 at the end of the season in '69
Oh yeah. This used to happen all the time when there were only 1 or 2 games on TV. Michigan State-Notre Dame is probably the other most famous example
Posted on 8/1/15 at 11:10 pm to Alert Mi
quote:
Don't you wish that Alabama had accepted the AP and UPI and FWAA in '64 and then turned around and told them all that they didn't accept their validity as polling services.
The FWAA didn't offer it to Alabama, so that wasn't even an option. I realize that's how things were done back then, but it doesn't change the fact that Alabama won a national championship, while losing to a team that undefeated Arkansas beat. And I'll never understand how a 9-1-1 Alabama was able to leap frog three 10-1 teams to win it all in '65.
Posted on 8/1/15 at 11:12 pm to mightysooner
quote:
We're just fine.
If you were just fine, would you really be on a different conferences message boards trolling at 11PM on a Saturday night?
As for the rest of your shitty post...can't you hear man, the money is in the way
Catch up in the recruiting rankings, tv exposure, tv money, national relevance, university standards etc...and then talk to me...as of right now you're fading away into obscurity in the big dumpster fire 12, the conference of 1 true champion and 10 true dumb asses.
Posted on 8/1/15 at 11:21 pm to PAGator
I can't remember the story, but I found this nugget about the game on wikipedia:
1969 Texas vs Arkansas Football Game
quote:
The 1969 season marked the 100th anniversary of college football. This game would decide the Southwest Conference Championship, as well as its berth in the Cotton Bowl Classic, and ABC television executive Beano Cook arranged for Texas and Arkansas to play the final game of the regular season, moving their usual October date to the first weekend in December. ABC Sports executive Roone Arledge persuaded Arkansas coach Frank Broyles to move the game with a promise that President Richard Nixon would attend the game, and ABC would televise Arkansas' season opener in 1970 against Stanford (and its star quarterback, Jim Plunkett).
1969 Texas vs Arkansas Football Game
Posted on 8/1/15 at 11:22 pm to redeye
quote:
And I'll never understand how a 9-1-1 Alabama was able to leap frog three 10-1 teams to win it all in '65.
#1 Michigan State lost in the Rose.
#2 Arkansas lost in the Cotton.
#4 Alabama beat #3 Nebraska in the Orange.
I don't see a problem.
Posted on 8/1/15 at 11:28 pm to Korin
quote:
#1 Michigan State lost in the Rose.
#2 Arkansas lost in the Cotton.
#4 Alabama beat #3 Nebraska in the Orange.
I don't see a problem.
If ties were still allowed, you think that could happen today? Alabama didn't even face a ranked team in the regular season.
edit: I think the AP only ranked 10 teams in '65, so that might explain why Alabama didn't face one. However, Arkansas faced 2 in Texas and Texas Tech.
This post was edited on 8/1/15 at 11:33 pm
Posted on 8/1/15 at 11:32 pm to redeye
quote:
Alabama didn't even face a ranked team in the regular season.
Georgia finished #15.
Tennessee finished #7.
LSU finished #8.
Posted on 8/1/15 at 11:36 pm to Korin
quote:
Georgia finished #15.
Tennessee finished #7.
LSU finished #8.
I was looking at the AP, which only ranked 10 for '65, but LSU and Tennessee are in there. They don't show up on the schedule I was looking at, so they may not have been ranked when the games were played.
Page 6 of 15
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News