Started By
Message
re: LOTS of smoke coming from Aggie land that A&M to the SEC is done deal...
Posted on 8/9/11 at 11:57 am to CajunFootball
Posted on 8/9/11 at 11:57 am to CajunFootball
Bama is in the west, how can you NOT play them? You may have an argument with fla. but, as a fan, I look forward to that game every year.
1
Posted on 8/9/11 at 11:57 am to LSUTygerFan
Florida fans do say it. They don't like that they have to play LSU every year as their team from the west.
Posted on 8/9/11 at 11:58 am to LSUTygerFan
Bama has to play us regardless because they are in the west. I can promise you that UF fans don't like playing us when they would much rathe play Miss State.
The benefit of beating UF is greater then beating Vandy and I admit that; however, I would much rather beat Vandy every year then lose to Florida some years. I guess you forgot that an 11-1 SEC team makes it to the SECCG game and BCSCG.
The benefit of beating UF is greater then beating Vandy and I admit that; however, I would much rather beat Vandy every year then lose to Florida some years. I guess you forgot that an 11-1 SEC team makes it to the SECCG game and BCSCG.
Posted on 8/9/11 at 11:59 am to CajunFootball
quote:
You are a fricking moron if you want to play Bama+UF every single year.
And you are a fricking pussy if you don't. It's fun to call people names. If we can't beat Florida and/or Bama, and that causes us to be left out, so be it. To want to get to the Championship by not playing good teams, is frankly, weak as shite. Besides, a team is going to win, at best 2-3 titles in a decade, so why not at least have some very high quality regular season games to watch?
Posted on 8/9/11 at 11:59 am to Dro
quote:Let me rephrase that, I would rather have the opportunity to beat a Florida then take a rent-a-win against Vandy.
quote:
A loss to Florida > a win over Vandy?
I honestly would take a loss to Florida over a rent-a-win over Vandy.
Posted on 8/9/11 at 12:00 pm to LSUdm21
not being a smart arse but why does it seem like the majority of folks think this is a good idea?
personally, i like the current SEC and do not see any advantages of adding two more teams? the only thing i see is it hurting lsu in recruiting in texas? what say you all?
personally, i like the current SEC and do not see any advantages of adding two more teams? the only thing i see is it hurting lsu in recruiting in texas? what say you all?
Posted on 8/9/11 at 12:00 pm to LSUTygerFan
Add aTm and missouri to the west(which was what they were talking about) then kick Bama to the east. It's not that hard to think about.
Everybody who says "YEAH WE NEED TO PLAY FLORIDA! THEY ARE A GOOD TEAM AND WE HAVE TO BEAT THEM!" Needs to think that if you play Vandy instead you get the win and have one less loss on your record. That one loss can get you a conference championship.
Everybody who says "YEAH WE NEED TO PLAY FLORIDA! THEY ARE A GOOD TEAM AND WE HAVE TO BEAT THEM!" Needs to think that if you play Vandy instead you get the win and have one less loss on your record. That one loss can get you a conference championship.
Posted on 8/9/11 at 12:00 pm to CajunFootball
SCREW THAT dude. I love playing Florida every year if you don't go cry somewhere else.
Posted on 8/9/11 at 12:00 pm to CajunFootball
/flame on
Are you a closet Boise fan?
/flame off
eta: just messing with you
Are you a closet Boise fan?
/flame off
eta: just messing with you
This post was edited on 8/9/11 at 12:05 pm
Posted on 8/9/11 at 12:01 pm to CajunFootball
quote:
So I guess it's fair that Ole Miss gets to play Vanderbilt every year while we play Florida?
What would have happened if LSU played Vandy instead of Florida in '07? It helps to play them as much, or more so, than it hurts.
Posted on 8/9/11 at 12:01 pm to CajunFootball
It's also bullshite so 
Posted on 8/9/11 at 12:02 pm to tycertd
I'm a fan of it because starting the LSU vs A&M rivalry again would be fun.
Posted on 8/9/11 at 12:02 pm to filmmaker45
quote:
SCREW THAT dude. I love playing Florida every year if you don't go cry somewhere else.
it does kind of frick with our schedule that we have to play them every year and schools like BAMA get UK. just sayin, it is what it is.
Posted on 8/9/11 at 12:03 pm to Tiger in NY
what happens if LSU played vandy instead of Florida in 03. Undefeated year with a NC.
Posted on 8/9/11 at 12:03 pm to CajunFootball
quote:
"YEAH WE NEED TO PLAY FLORIDA! THEY ARE A GOOD TEAM AND WE HAVE TO BEAT THEM!"
If you can't beat teams like fla and bama, you don't deserve to play for the national championship.
Posted on 8/9/11 at 12:03 pm to KingwoodLsuFan
quote:
I'm a fan of it because starting the LSU vs A&M rivalry again would be fun.
i agree but why cant we just always agree to play each other out of conference every year or some kind of 10-12 year deal?
Posted on 8/9/11 at 12:04 pm to KingwoodLsuFan
quote:
Florida fans do say it. They don't like that they have to play LSU every year as their team from the west.
And most Florida fans I've met out here are pussies who don't really give a shite about football.
Posted on 8/9/11 at 12:06 pm to JBeam
Thats just how it works out dude. Not our fault Florida is stronger then Kentucky.
Posted on 8/9/11 at 12:07 pm to KingwoodLsuFan
quote:
what happens if LSU played vandy instead of Florida in 03. Undefeated year with a NC.
Yeah, but what happens if you trade a loss to UF for a loss to Vandy or Kentucky that year? No chance at the title.
Posted on 8/9/11 at 12:07 pm to CajunFootball
How many here saying this are the same who blamed a weak out of conference schedule for the problems in baseball the past 2 years?
Page 4 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News