Started By
Message
re: Looking forward: UF @ Texas A&M
Posted on 9/1/12 at 11:49 pm to boXerrumble
Posted on 9/1/12 at 11:49 pm to boXerrumble
I would be surprised if the game is decided by double digits either way. Unlike the poster above I thought your O Line did well in the run game and our interior line is a question mark, so that's my biggest worry defensively for A&M. On the flip side I wasn't that impressed with your run D and I think we will run it well if your defense plays like it did today.
It should be a very good game, I worry that y'all got all the first game shite ironed out (dumb penalties and all) and that we will have those problems early on. Either way I cannot wait for next Saturday. It should be an electric atmosphere.
It should be a very good game, I worry that y'all got all the first game shite ironed out (dumb penalties and all) and that we will have those problems early on. Either way I cannot wait for next Saturday. It should be an electric atmosphere.
2
Posted on 9/1/12 at 11:50 pm to aggiegreg93
223 yards is pretty solid. As mentioned we tried to bash them when they loaded the box. 3rd down
appears to have been an issue.
appears to have been an issue.
Posted on 9/1/12 at 11:52 pm to roadGator
That didn't come out the way I meant....should have said "QBs didnt perform how you WANT them to perform". I would think the Florida fan base has high expectations year in and year out with the QBs you've had over the years...
Posted on 9/1/12 at 11:53 pm to boXerrumble
Uf 21 atm 20
Posted on 9/1/12 at 11:53 pm to aggiegreg93
quote:
That didn't come out the way I meant....should have said "QBs didnt perform how you WANT them to perform". I would think the Florida fan base has high expectations year in and year out with the QBs you've had over the years...
That was until John Brantley happened.
Posted on 9/1/12 at 11:53 pm to aggiegreg93
I want them to be average. If they can't do that then put a FR in and rebuild that position. That's not very much to ask for.
Posted on 9/1/12 at 11:58 pm to roadGator
And that's why I said you guys still don't have a QB...they didn't perform even avg today...considering the competition
Posted on 9/1/12 at 11:59 pm to aggiegreg93
10/16 1 TD no ints is not average?
We didn't even try to throw the ball.
I don't get what you want. It's apparently a lot more than I want from our young/inexperienced QBs.
16 attempts. That's it. At what, 68%.
Frick.
We didn't even try to throw the ball.
I don't get what you want. It's apparently a lot more than I want from our young/inexperienced QBs.
16 attempts. That's it. At what, 68%.
Frick.
Posted on 9/2/12 at 12:01 am to aggiegreg93
But I'm sure they will improve...like one of the other posts said...we have a nack for making avg QBs look great...esp last year!
Posted on 9/2/12 at 12:05 am to aggiegreg93
Roadgator.........they played freaking Bowling Green. Your QBs should have executed way better against that competition. Did I mention they played Bowling Green? You bring that week arse shyte to Kyle Field next weekend and it won't be close...and Muschamp knows it.
Posted on 9/2/12 at 12:05 am to aggiegreg93
I don't think either of them looked bad... but neither of them looked good which you would expect them to being top recruits playing against a cupcake.
But the playcalling really didn't give either an opportunity to. And I'm sure both guys were also playing very tight afraid to make a big mistake with Muschamp playing games with the starting position.
They called really safe throws for both of them. Driskel finished 10/16. He missed badly on two throws but they were on the run and across his body. The other incompletions were drops or throwaways. So not terrible but not very good because the offense wasn't moving very well... but again that was also a result of our inability to convert third and short.
But the playcalling really didn't give either an opportunity to. And I'm sure both guys were also playing very tight afraid to make a big mistake with Muschamp playing games with the starting position.
They called really safe throws for both of them. Driskel finished 10/16. He missed badly on two throws but they were on the run and across his body. The other incompletions were drops or throwaways. So not terrible but not very good because the offense wasn't moving very well... but again that was also a result of our inability to convert third and short.
Posted on 9/2/12 at 12:09 am to aggiegreg93
So you think 68% is not good enough? You think 16 passes is enough to draw conclusions?
I give up. This place is shiite and I'm tired.
I give up. This place is shiite and I'm tired.
Posted on 9/2/12 at 12:14 am to roadGator
I think if the other team is loading the box then you throw it.....BUT.....your coaches don't have the confidence in your QBs....if you are going to sit here and be excited about the QB play because of 10/16 then good luck to you. But the eye test on the QBs didn't look great. Numbers turned out okay, but seriously...they aren't going to be in the top 25 with that kind of play............against Bowling F-king Green!
Posted on 9/2/12 at 12:14 am to aggiegreg93
quote:
You bring that week arse shyte to Kyle Field next weekend and it won't be close until we choke in the second half...and Muschamp knows it.
FIFY
Posted on 9/2/12 at 12:15 am to roadGator
most of those rushing yards were misdirection outside yards and missed tackles by Bowling Green High. Demps and Rainey type of runs.
UF had no push up front. couldn't punch it in on critical 3rd and 1 & 4th and 1. BG High looked better at times in the trenches.
UF had no push up front. couldn't punch it in on critical 3rd and 1 & 4th and 1. BG High looked better at times in the trenches.
Posted on 9/2/12 at 12:17 am to Crompdaddy8
quote:
UF had no push up front. couldn't punch it in on critical 3rd and 1 & 4th and 1.
Did you watch teh game at all?
UF could run whenever it wanted to when it WASN'T 3rd or 4th and short.
UF got over 200 yards rushing today, and none of those were Demps/Rainey type runs.
Posted on 9/2/12 at 12:18 am to aggiegreg93
Well, at least I know your style now. You started off with some nice posts and then unprovoked you turn into a typical SECRantard.
I'm so bored with the biased bullshite around here it's not funny. This place would be much improved with an ignore button.
You said we expected too much. Then changed it to we wanted to much. I pointed out that neither were true. Then the shiite starts flying.
We'll play next week and will win or lose. Either way, this place will be shiite.
I'm so bored with the biased bullshite around here it's not funny. This place would be much improved with an ignore button.
You said we expected too much. Then changed it to we wanted to much. I pointed out that neither were true. Then the shiite starts flying.
We'll play next week and will win or lose. Either way, this place will be shiite.
Posted on 9/2/12 at 12:19 am to roadGator
I got my account in December, today was unbearable on here earlier. I just stopped checking it. An absolute shitshow
Posted on 9/2/12 at 12:22 am to WPSMomma
quote:
Uf 21 atm 20
add 20 points to each score and you've got it right.
Posted on 9/2/12 at 12:22 am to roadGator
No...I said they didn't perform to your expectations....not inflated expectations....considering the competition. You need to drop the blue and orange glasses...cuz I'm not putting words into anyone's mouth.
Page 2 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News