Started By
Message
re: Looking deeper at wins over 'ranked' foes
Posted on 5/15/14 at 3:39 am to Cockopotamus
Posted on 5/15/14 at 3:39 am to Cockopotamus
quote:
Yall are paying Sumlin 5 million a year after a 4 loss season. You should probably worry about aTm's relevancy in the present and not USC's relevancy in the future
Kevin Sumlin is 20 years younger than Spurrier, his best coaching days are in front of him. How many more years is Spurrier going to give USC?
Clock's ticking
Posted on 5/15/14 at 3:44 am to CNB
quote:
You keep saying that as if it's some huge accomplishment.
I agree. One SEC East title in one's tenure in the SEC is no accomplishment.
Posted on 5/15/14 at 3:51 am to Roger Klarvin
quote:
I think USC fans have started to take Spurrier for granted. Compare their program now to what it was before he arrived, and compare his accomplishments at USC to what he did before he arrived. It seems clear to me what's going on here.
I maintain this is a case of a top 5-10 coach of all-time working a small miracle with a historically low end program. The odds of Spurrier being the sole catalyst behind this run are far greater than a sleeping giant being awoken which will carry on long after he has left.
Insightful post.
Posted on 5/15/14 at 3:56 am to CNB
The flaw in this logic is a team drops in the ranking after you beat them.
Posted on 5/15/14 at 4:03 am to Roger Klarvin
quote:
not USC's relevancy in the future
Kevin Sumlin is 20 years younger than Spurrier, his best coaching days are in front of him. How many more years is Spurrier going to
Should've given manzel 5 million.
Posted on 5/15/14 at 4:07 am to Roger Klarvin
quote:He'll retire after the 2017 season.
How many more years is Spurrier going to give USC?
Posted on 5/15/14 at 5:23 am to meansonny
quote:
Was the loss to UGA last season a loss to a good team or to a bad team?
That's the part that the final rankings doesn't take into account.
It was a loss to a good team, you should know that.
I mean we did watch the same game didn't we? UGA had a bad string of luck last year that started in Tennessee, otherwise dawgs are sitting right there at the end in the top 10.
Posted on 5/15/14 at 8:15 am to weagle99
quote:
South Carolina has never beaten Auburn in SEC play.
Unfortunately I don't see that changing this year at Jordan-Hare.
We had our chance 3 years ago
Posted on 5/15/14 at 8:17 am to scrooster
quote:
1. South Carolina: 12-3, .800 (5-2)
Yet so very little to show for it.
I guess when you lose to the tennessees and kentuckys of the world it kinda offsets the ranked wins.
Posted on 5/15/14 at 8:43 am to bamabenny
quote:
inb4 all the LSU fans thumping their chest because they've played two more games against ranked people than Bama since '11
Any port in a storm
Posted on 5/15/14 at 8:45 am to WG_Dawg
quote:
I guess when you lose to the tennessees and kentuckys of the world it kinda offsets the ranked wins.
Rather them than the UCF's and Colorado's of the world.
Posted on 5/15/14 at 8:46 am to CNB
Neither of those losses kept us from winning the east so joke's on you!
ETA: And to elaborate further, even though I know you were kidding..the year we lost to UCF we were 6-6 going into the game and playing in a mediocre bowl game, the loss to colorado was in the same year as well. At the very least, we can say we sucked when we lost to those other crappy teams. SC is losing to sucky teams when they are legitimatley good and have a chance to play in atlanta.
ETA: And to elaborate further, even though I know you were kidding..the year we lost to UCF we were 6-6 going into the game and playing in a mediocre bowl game, the loss to colorado was in the same year as well. At the very least, we can say we sucked when we lost to those other crappy teams. SC is losing to sucky teams when they are legitimatley good and have a chance to play in atlanta.
This post was edited on 5/15/14 at 8:48 am
Posted on 5/15/14 at 8:48 am to CNB
well yeah I mean whatever man
This post was edited on 5/15/14 at 8:48 am
Posted on 5/15/14 at 8:49 am to scrooster
quote:
1. South Carolina: 12-3, .800 (5-2)
2. Alabama: 8-4, .667 (4-4)
3. LSU: 9-5, .643 (6-5)
Big 3
quote:
5. Georgia: 5-11, .312 (2-9)
Richt
Posted on 5/15/14 at 8:50 am to scrooster
quote:
7. Auburn: 4-13, .235 (3-8)
Posted on 5/15/14 at 8:50 am to craigbiggio
Your lol'ing should be directed at grantham, not richt.
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News