Started By
Message

re: Key to a dominant sec team.

Posted on 9/19/12 at 6:31 am to
Posted by bobbyray21
Member since Sep 2009
9490 posts
Posted on 9/19/12 at 6:31 am to
quote:

Clock controlling offense


Or an offense that can score quickly. Which, to be clear, means you don't actually need a clock controlling offense.
Posted by bobbyray21
Member since Sep 2009
9490 posts
Posted on 9/19/12 at 7:02 am to
quote:

Clock controlling offense


NOTE: in this post I am not trying to be a dick. I have been a dick at various points throughout this thread, but only towards Rickdaddy, and only in response to him being a dick first. Glad we got that cleared up.

1. A clock-controlling offense, and the benefits that flow therefrom, is conventional wisdom in football.
2. Conventional wisdom is often completely incorrect.
3. So much so that the term should be renamed.

If Team A is better than Team B, an offensive strategy of "controlling the clock" is not only a bad strategy for Team A, it is actually the worst possible strategy that Team A can employ.

Think about it like this. Are upsets (simply defined as the better team losing to the worse team) more common in hockey or in basketball? They are more likely in hockey. The best team in the NHL in a given year will win roughly 65% of its games. The best team in the NBA in a given year will win roughly 80% of its games.

The reason for this completely intuitive. Hockey is a lower scoring game than basketball. And in games were there is less scoring, the chances of there being a flukey or lucky outcome are increased. A lucky goal or two in hockey usually results in a win for that team. A lucky three pointer or two in basketball does not.

So back to our football example. If you're Team A, the worst possible thing you can do is decrease the number of possessions in the game. All this does is increase the likelihood of a flukey event such as a fumble returned for a TD or a pick six on a deflected pass being a game-changing (i.e. game-winning) event for Team B.

If you are Team A and you have the ability to score quickly, you score quickly.
Posted by tylerdurden24
Member since Sep 2009
46599 posts
Posted on 9/19/12 at 7:06 am to
quote:

Georgia relys on Murray to much

By this logic, you guys should never have had to rely on Jordan Jefferson and you're all making abig deal out of Mett for no reason at all.

And you haven't watched UGA's ground game whatsoever
Posted by nc14
La Jolla
Member since Jan 2012
28193 posts
Posted on 9/19/12 at 7:11 am to
I listed three that have been key the years that we have had success - a couple.

Controlling the clock does three things - keeps the opponent's "quick strike" offense off of the field and takes them out of their rhythm (re:key to beating Spurrier at UF, even though it didn't happen much), shortens the game (fresher legs in 4Q) and rests your defense. A defense that stays on the field is a recipe for defeat.
This post was edited on 9/19/12 at 7:42 am
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
30279 posts
Posted on 9/19/12 at 8:09 am to
Boosters. The answer is "boosters".
Posted by nc14
La Jolla
Member since Jan 2012
28193 posts
Posted on 9/19/12 at 8:46 am to
quote:


Boosters. The answer is "boosters".


Shhh, I wasn't going to share that publically.
Posted by bobbyray21
Member since Sep 2009
9490 posts
Posted on 9/19/12 at 10:25 am to
quote:

Boosters. The answer is "boosters".


And we have a winner.

Page 1 2 3 4 5 6
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 6Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter