re: Is the SEC finally balanced?

quote:

---

Bama still only has 2 conference championships to show for their massive dynasty...

They're the luckiest dynasty ever: A Colt McCoy injury, a mulligan, and a stupid play by Murray gave Gumpville their dynasty

---

U still SO mad

You are just too easy.

Like I said, if Alabama can get specially designed cupcake schedules, more power to them.

If the SEC wants to keep feeding Alabama baby formula cross-rival schedules in the form of Tennessee and Kentucky, that is their right.

All the LSU fans have to do is bend over and let the SEC schedulers insert Florida and Georgia where the sun don't shine.

quote:

---

Why wont you answer the question?

---

Ok, since LSU beat my Buckeyes in 2007, I started to pay more attention to the SEC.

When Cam Cameron got fired, I was hoping my Cleveland Browns would hire him, but our new owner had other plans.

When Cameron went to LSU, I found the RANT and was amused by this message board.

The more I learned about the scheduling of the SEC, I could see how Alabama has benefitted from the so called permanent cross-rival opponent rule.

Tennessee has lost its regional recruiting base in the new SEC, and there is little hope of every regaining it. All the SEC perennial powers have great in-state recruiting talent levels, but Tennessee does not.

With the exception of Florida and LSU, all SEC teams benefit from the permanent opponent rule with easier SEC schedules.

The majority of SEC schools are happy to have two of their recruiting titans (Florida and LSU) slug it out every year, while they get somebody else.

I get it! Bama gets Tennessee and all the other SEC West teams get somebody other than Florida, so it works for everybody but LSU.

On the other hand, Florida gets LSU, but they don't have to deal with Bama, LSU, or TAM in their division, so they will take on the burden of happily dominating Georgia and S.Carolina with one hand tied behind their back. A much easier challenge than any of the other titans in the SEC West has to deal with.

I can see the SEC whining and crying, in the near future, about how unfair the 4-team playoff is because so many teams with inferior schedules get in before a second SEC team with a superior schedule does.

But then I will remember the SEC doesn't really care about what is fair when it comes to SEC schedules; do you?

quote:

---

They're the luckiest dynasty ever:

---

To be a lucky dynasty, first you have to be a dynasty, they are not..

We can add you to the list of LSU fans who don't think its a dynasty.

Stop picking on the Bama fans about their SEC manufactured football dynasty.

Just because they couldn't win their division in 2011, and just because they were eliminated from the SEC C.G. in 2011, and just because they had to hit the trifecta by making the BCS C.G. for a mulligan against LSU, you shouldn't question their self-proclaimed dynasty.

They won the mulligan and got a split with LSU in 2011, so let them have their self-proclaimed dynasty.

Just because TAM beat Alabama in Tuscaloosa, and Alabama didn't have to play Florida like TAM and LSU had to do last year, should not be a reason to question their self-proclaimed dynasty.

You can laugh a lot, but don't question it!

If you can't take no for an answer, I can't help you.

I have a few questions for you to answer.

As a Bama fan, why can't you man up and say "We know we have an advantage over LSU in scheduling, and we are not about to give it up; LSU is just too damn strong".


How about this one? "Sure we got lucky when TAM got Florida placed on their schedule last year". We know the SEC schedulers can't keep gift wrapping us SEC West title winning schedules every year-damn our luck".

Why can't the Bama fans just man up and acknowledge their good fortune the last couple of years.

Don't tell me; let me guess. You have a dynasty claim to protect.

Alabama did not deserve to be in the National Championship game last season.

Sure, they stomped Notre Dame, but Bama didn't deserve to be there in the first place.

Bama only got to the SEC Championship game because A&M had to play Florida. A team that loses on it's home field, like Bama did, should never play for a National Championship.

Beating Georgia in Atlanta is not justification enough for deserving a shot at the National Championship, because Georgia played an even weaker schedule than Alabama.

When you are 5 yards from getting beat by a team that lost to South Carolina by 28 points, you should not play for a National Title.

Alabama was chosen to play for the National Championship because of their name.

quote:

---

Alabama was chosen to play for the National Championship because of their name.

---

They got chosen for the BCS C.G. because my undefeated Ohio St. Buckeyes were on suspension.

Just because a few players got some free tatts--big deal!