Started By
Message
re: ESPN Way Too Early Top 25
Posted on 1/17/14 at 1:59 pm to Gardevoir
Posted on 1/17/14 at 1:59 pm to Gardevoir
Auburn's going to have a preseason ranking
therefore they shall lose 4 games minimum
unranked in the preseason?
that's an Auburn national championship team right there
try and explain Auburn football the past 10 years
therefore they shall lose 4 games minimum
unranked in the preseason?
that's an Auburn national championship team right there
try and explain Auburn football the past 10 years
Posted on 1/17/14 at 1:59 pm to Camo Tiger 337
quote:
Auburn at 3 EVEN THOUGH they lose Tre Mason, thier starting T, and thier Fullback.
2003 redux
Posted on 1/17/14 at 2:04 pm to cas4t
quote:
4. Alabama
quote:
I know they're still loaded with talent, but damn that's high to just have lost AJ
It may end up being high but Alabama has built up a lot of cache because of the following consistency:
2008: 12-2, final rank 6th
2009 (new QB): 14-0, final rank 1st
2010: 10-3, final rank 10th
2011 (new QB): 12-1, final rank 1st
2012: 13-1, final rank 1st
2013: 11-2, final rank 7th
In fact that averages to a 4th place finish. Maybe ESPN is just playing the averages.
Posted on 1/17/14 at 2:06 pm to elposter
i just wish they were consistent.
LSU loses a ton and the narrative is that even though we are recruiting lights out that we will take a step back..
Bama loses a ton and it's oh they will reload.
LSU loses a ton and the narrative is that even though we are recruiting lights out that we will take a step back..
Bama loses a ton and it's oh they will reload.
Posted on 1/17/14 at 2:12 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
i just wish they were consistent.
LSU loses a ton and the narrative is that even though we are recruiting lights out that we will take a step back..
Bama loses a ton and it's oh they will reload.
I hear this talking point a lot, but this ranking has LSU two spots higher than they finished in 2013. It has Bama three spots higher than they finished in 2013.
I see some consistency there.
Posted on 1/17/14 at 2:17 pm to elposter
i'm talking more about what the talking heads say
Posted on 1/17/14 at 2:18 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
quote:Auburn at 3 EVEN THOUGH they lose Tre Mason, thier starting T, and thier Fullback. 2003 redux
If you remember in 2003 AU had a lot of talent coming back. The problem was they were trying to replace Bobby Petrino with Hugh Nall. Last time I looked Gus is still coming back.
Posted on 1/17/14 at 2:18 pm to Irons Puppet
quote:
Last time I looked Gus is still coming back
good news for LSU!
Posted on 1/17/14 at 2:20 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
good news for LSU!
Keep livin in the past homer.
Posted on 1/17/14 at 2:21 pm to elposter
quote:
but this ranking has LSU two spots higher than they finished in 2013.
To be fair, as I stated earlier, I think that ranking is too high for LSU, losing 2 wr's, 2 rb's, qb, and 1 ol, along with the defensive losses which are not nearly as much this year.
Posted on 1/17/14 at 2:24 pm to AUtigerNOLA
quote:
Keep livin in the past homer.
I will as soon as you move back to Alabama so my state can be rid of you once and for all.
Posted on 1/17/14 at 2:26 pm to AUtigerNOLA
quote:
Keep livin in the past homer.
Didn't you know? ULSU fans only care about rivalry games, not about final standings.
Posted on 1/17/14 at 2:27 pm to Projectpat
quote:
Projectpat
looks like someone else is dealing with some cognitive dissonance too
Posted on 1/17/14 at 2:28 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
I will as soon as you move back to Alabama so my state can be rid of you once and for all.
Will. Not. Happen. So in the mean time, go frick yourself
Posted on 1/17/14 at 2:31 pm to AUtigerNOLA
quote:
So in the mean time, go frick yourself
No, frick you. And i don't even mean that in a trolling td.com kind of way. Seriously. frick YOU.
Posted on 1/17/14 at 2:35 pm to AUtigerNOLA
It doesn't have anything to do with you as a poster. It has everything to do with you growing up in Louisiana then deciding to be an Auburn fan. You're a traitor, plain and simple.
Posted on 1/17/14 at 2:35 pm to dawgfan24348
Oregon should be 1st imho.
Auburn should be lower.
Why is UNC ranked?
Texas should not be ranked.
Florida should not be ranked.
Auburn should be lower.
Why is UNC ranked?
Texas should not be ranked.
Florida should not be ranked.
Posted on 1/17/14 at 2:36 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
quote:
Oregon ahead of Bama and Little Brother is hilariously stupid.
They return a ton of talent. Why is it stupid?
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News