Started By
Message

re: Eric Berry shouldn't be 1st Team All-SEC

Posted on 11/20/09 at 1:16 pm to
Posted by hehatedrew
New Zealand
Member since Oct 2009
25504 posts
Posted on 11/20/09 at 1:16 pm to
Mallett for 2nd team SEC!!!
Posted by Sao
East Texas Piney Woods
Member since Jun 2009
65779 posts
Posted on 11/20/09 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

If you actually take the time to read what I posted, I said he deserved it based of a mixture of great stats(which he DOES have), leadership(which he has more of), and off the field(Tebow = Saint, Mallett = DUI)



You just eliminated Brandon Spikes with your odd logic. I could think of a few more if you like...

This post was edited on 11/20/09 at 1:20 pm
Posted by woopiginaustin
Moderator
Member since Jun 2008
8590 posts
Posted on 11/20/09 at 1:22 pm to
quote:


You just eliminated Brandon Spikes with your odd logic. I cold think of a few more if you like...


Sao, it's the messenger (me) that has led this to 4 pages.

They are not arguing against Mallett having superior numbers, because they can't, but because it's me that's pimping Mallett they will go to the ends of the earth to come up with other reasoning.

The bottom line is if Mallett isn't worthy of 1st team, neither is Eric Berry and numerous other "locks".
Posted by CapstoneGrad06
Little Rock
Member since Nov 2008
72215 posts
Posted on 11/20/09 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

But in 3 weeks you will hear about it from every Hog fan, ESPN, and media out let out there when the Tebow love-fest robs the SEC's best QB of a deserved honor.


Mallett has struggled against every good defense he's faced. If there's consistent pressure, he completes well below 50%. Tebow doesn't have huge numbers, but he hasn't struggled against great defenses. He really only had one bad game,and that was throwing two picks against Miss. State.
Posted by Sao
East Texas Piney Woods
Member since Jun 2009
65779 posts
Posted on 11/20/09 at 1:30 pm to

Pank must be stuck on the Eli question...

Poor guy
Posted by GoHoGsGo06
Member since Nov 2006
5739 posts
Posted on 11/20/09 at 1:32 pm to
It is pure and simple.

Ole Miss fans and SEC in general want TO NOT GIVE it to Mallett, instead of wanting TO GIVE it to Tebow. If you have to pull subjective things that have little to do with the QB position alone (W/L record [win and lose as a team, Florida's top 5 defense really helps Tebow here, although Mallett still has better number], Leadership, etc)

This isnt the All-SEC Leadership award. It is the All-SEC QB Award. And it "should" be given the the QB who has produced the best in league (overall, not just passing). In this case so far, Mallett is owning Tebow in just about every QB category, and even for those who want to bring in rushing TDs and Total Yards...Mallett is still ahead of Tebow right now.

Of course Tebow will probably have more TDs/ Total yards when season is over because of the extra game played.

Arkansas fans just need to be quiet, realizing we have the best QB in the league (in terms of on-field production this year), and we will be glad to have him another year.
Posted by Sao
East Texas Piney Woods
Member since Jun 2009
65779 posts
Posted on 11/20/09 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

Mallett has struggled against every good defense he's faced. If there's consistent pressure, he completes well below 50%. Tebow doesn't have huge numbers, but he hasn't struggled against great defenses. He really only had one bad game,and that was throwing two picks against Miss. State.



And Mallett has a chance to eat them up tomorrow. If he does post superior numbers in the game, is it moot? Also, Tebow's sack total doubled vs. Arkansas. I fully expect that nugget of info to be a "Team" stat and not a "Tebow" stat however. Well...W/L's aren't a Mallett stat knowing our D sucks, right?

See how this works? I can use circular logic within this debate as well.
Posted by GoHoGsGo06
Member since Nov 2006
5739 posts
Posted on 11/20/09 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

Mallett has struggled against every good defense he's faced. If there's consistent pressure, he completes well below 50%. Tebow doesn't have huge numbers, but he hasn't struggled against great defenses. He really only had one bad game,and that was throwing two picks against Miss. State.


1) What QB doesn't have less numbers against good defenses?

2) Tebow was pretty bad in the Arkansas game. Arkansas has the 97th ranked defense. Not so much in pass yards (he had one 70+ yard bomb), but in terms of getting sacked 6 times and turning the ball over.

I think we need to compare the teams against similar competition...maybe that can show part of the story?
Posted by Cdawg
TigerFred's Living Room
Member since Sep 2003
59532 posts
Posted on 11/20/09 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

Mallett has struggled against every good defense he's faced. If there's consistent pressure, he completes well below 50%

Actual on-field play doesn't count, only his overall total numbers do.

quote:

Tebow doesn't have huge numbers, but he hasn't struggled against great defenses.

Still doesn't matter, Mallett has better numbers.
Posted by hehatedrew
New Zealand
Member since Oct 2009
25504 posts
Posted on 11/20/09 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

Ole Miss fans



Wow. Obsess much? Maybe you should read through the whole thread. Thought I saw other posters saying that Timmy should win it too.
Posted by PistolaVeloce
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Oct 2009
428 posts
Posted on 11/20/09 at 1:38 pm to
Florida succeeds or doesn't according to one person's play. That's Tim Tebow. That's why he is better. All the intangible things of being a great college QB and leader...

For the record I hate the Tebow knob slobbing too... but credit is due where credit is due.
Posted by CapstoneGrad06
Little Rock
Member since Nov 2008
72215 posts
Posted on 11/20/09 at 1:38 pm to
He was around 30% against Alabama and Ole Miss. Just over 40% against Florida. I would think a first team All-SEC QB would have at least a little better of a game against good defenses. I think the benefit of the doubt is going to go with a former Heisman winner, with two national titles under his belt.
Posted by GoHoGsGo06
Member since Nov 2006
5739 posts
Posted on 11/20/09 at 1:38 pm to
What I have gathered from this thread:

-When Mallett has a bad game/bad numbers, it is his fault.

-When Tebow has mulitple bad games, the team sucks.

-Team stats (W/L record, total defense, etc) are only attributable to one person, the QB. God forbid Florida's defense save them in a game or two....
Posted by GoHoGsGo06
Member since Nov 2006
5739 posts
Posted on 11/20/09 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

with two national titles under his belt.
Did Tebow "lead" his team to victory in the first NC game? I could have sworn is was CHRIS LEAK!
Posted by CapstoneGrad06
Little Rock
Member since Nov 2008
72215 posts
Posted on 11/20/09 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

Actual on-field play doesn't count, only his overall total numbers do.


I hope you're kidding. Why would people vote for Mallett, when the only times he's been on regional or national television, and was visible to voters, he struggles pretty bad?

quote:

Still doesn't matter, Mallett has better numbers.


So, purely putting up numbers, where the majority came against bad teams, is more important than winning and doing it consistently. Again, Tebow might not have ungodly number, but I think I might want a warrior leading a final drive for a title for me. I think that's what defines a all-conference QB.
Posted by hehatedrew
New Zealand
Member since Oct 2009
25504 posts
Posted on 11/20/09 at 1:41 pm to
he's got the bling
Posted by GoHoGsGo06
Member since Nov 2006
5739 posts
Posted on 11/20/09 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

Florida succeeds or doesn't according to one person's play. That's Tim Tebow. That's why he is better. All the intangible things of being a great college QB and leader...

For the record I hate the Tebow knob slobbing too... but credit is due where credit is due.

That is a crock of shite. If Tebow had Arkansas' defense, people would be singing a different story. Florida is scoring like 33 points a game (Much less than that in non-cupcake games). If Florida's defense gave up 30+ points a game like us, i doubt Tebow could save them everytime.
Posted by CapstoneGrad06
Little Rock
Member since Nov 2008
72215 posts
Posted on 11/20/09 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

Did Tebow "lead" his team to victory in the first NC game? I could have sworn is was CHRIS LEAK!


Tebow was just as important in that offense his freshman year as Leak. One could easily argue that if Tebow hadn't been there in short yardage situations, Florida doesn't get a chance against Ohio State.
Posted by Cdawg
TigerFred's Living Room
Member since Sep 2003
59532 posts
Posted on 11/20/09 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

I hope you're kidding.

I was hoping you could detect the laid on thick sarcasm.
Posted by Sao
East Texas Piney Woods
Member since Jun 2009
65779 posts
Posted on 11/20/09 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

Wow. Obsess much? Maybe you should read through the whole thread. Thought I saw other posters saying that Timmy should win it too.



Umm, psstt, genius, your little buddy PankReb was comment 3 on this thread and has as many posts as the OP on the damn thing. Obsess much indeed...
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter