Started By
Message
re: Does Your School Claim "Co" Championships?(Football)
Posted on 4/20/17 at 9:15 am to lsupride87
Posted on 4/20/17 at 9:15 am to lsupride87
I tried to explain it, but he just points out a publication that is put out by the SEC main office
2
Posted on 4/20/17 at 9:16 am to lsupride87
quote:
Throughout this thread....
So you dont have an example.
Posted on 4/20/17 at 9:16 am to LSUNV
quote:I am confused
I tried to explain it, but he just points out a publication that is put out by the SEC main office
Who is he trying to troll? Ole miss? Every other school? Himself?
Posted on 4/20/17 at 9:16 am to LSUNV
quote:
I tried to explain it, but he just points out a publication that is put out by the SEC main office
Nope, this is LSU media...
any other false assumptions?
Posted on 4/20/17 at 9:16 am to NYCAuburn
quote:Ole Miss claims the 2003 co division championship. No other school does
So you dont have an example.
Posted on 4/20/17 at 9:17 am to lsupride87
quote:
Ole Miss claims the 2003 co division championship. No other school does
Well that is factually incorrect on both interpretations. 2003 or that no other school claims co division championships
Posted on 4/20/17 at 9:21 am to NYCAuburn
How?
LSU publications come straight from the SEC front office. You still have not shown any valid point to discredit that LSU does not claim CO-Championships. I heave never seen anything in our trophy case or media that says co-champions
LSU publications come straight from the SEC front office. You still have not shown any valid point to discredit that LSU does not claim CO-Championships. I heave never seen anything in our trophy case or media that says co-champions
Posted on 4/20/17 at 9:23 am to NYCAuburn
On a side note
In basketball
UNC claims their 1924 Helms
KU claims 1922 and 1923 Helms
Mizzou claims 1921 and 1922 Premo-Porretta
I sense some miscegenation amongst these 3
In basketball
UNC claims their 1924 Helms
KU claims 1922 and 1923 Helms
Mizzou claims 1921 and 1922 Premo-Porretta
I sense some miscegenation amongst these 3
Posted on 4/20/17 at 9:24 am to LSUNV
quote:
How?
How does something come from LSU media? if you need that answered, then you probably dont belong in any discussion
quote:
LSU publications come straight from the SEC front office
umm, no they dont
quote:
You still have not shown any valid point to discredit that LSU does not claim CO-Championships
You cant be serious. I showed you a direct quote from LSU that claims them. sorry you couldn't read.
quote:
I heave never seen anything in our trophy case or media that says co-champions
sorry you can't/didn't read. Maybe try it before making false claims
This post was edited on 4/20/17 at 9:26 am
Posted on 4/20/17 at 9:25 am to NYCAuburn
I know you have some down time and are using it to Troll LSU fans, so congratulations. But there is no anger towards Ole Miss from LSU fans...only pity that all they have to put on a banner and hang in their stadium is a sign that says 2003 SEC West Division Champions. They didn't even bother to put Co-Champions...just plain ole Champions. It should be embarrassing for them, but the fact that it isn't, is embarrassing to everyone else in the league.
This post was edited on 4/20/17 at 9:28 am
Posted on 4/20/17 at 9:28 am to 1BIGTigerFan
quote:
But the is no anger towards Ole Miss from LSU fans
Have you seen some of the comments on here the last few weeks?
quote:
They didn't even bother to put Co-Champions
I agree with that aspect, but other schools dont notate completely as well
quote:
I know you have some down time and are using it to Troll LSU fans, so congratulations.
honestly its not trolling, just an outsider looking in and after an easy search, I found the topic a bit comical
This post was edited on 4/20/17 at 9:32 am
Posted on 4/20/17 at 9:31 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
Have you seen some of the comments on here the last few weeks?
Well, you're right. I should have clarified that there is no additional "anger" over their stupid sign. But there is a lot of anger about them and their lame school and fans in general.
Posted on 4/20/17 at 9:33 am to NYCAuburn
Dude,
First off, don't tell me where we get our publications from especially since you are talking to a guy that used to publish them.
And again idiot, where does the word co-champions appear in the publication you posted. All it said was we were division champs, what it doesn't say is co-champion. You can have more than 1 division champ like a tie. We don't dispute that,
First off, don't tell me where we get our publications from especially since you are talking to a guy that used to publish them.
And again idiot, where does the word co-champions appear in the publication you posted. All it said was we were division champs, what it doesn't say is co-champion. You can have more than 1 division champ like a tie. We don't dispute that,
Posted on 4/20/17 at 9:34 am to LSUNV
quote:
First off, don't tell me where we get our publications from especially since you are talking to a guy that used to publish them.
Did you use Host Publishing back in the day before they sold to IMG College?
Posted on 4/20/17 at 9:35 am to Cheese Grits
It's spring. That means it's mating season for the large feline (Pantherinae) species, and the males are feeling rather salty.
Also, if you know any Auburn or LSU girls that are pleasing to your eye, it'd be a great time to make a run at 'em....good luck.
Also, if you know any Auburn or LSU girls that are pleasing to your eye, it'd be a great time to make a run at 'em....good luck.
Posted on 4/20/17 at 9:36 am to LSUNV
quote:
Dude,
First off, don't tell me where we get our publications from especially since you are talking to a guy that used to publish them.
So you should know that LSU controls the content of their media. great, why didnt you show this with your previous comments
quote:
And again idiot, where does the word co-champions appear in the publication you posted.
Sorry, I guess LSU didnt list as a co-champion, even though they were and didnt make it to Atlanta. According the the other poster in here, that is even more of a travesty, right?
quote:
All it said was we were division champs, what it doesn't say is co-champion
so no problem with Ole Miss then right?
Posted on 4/20/17 at 9:38 am to NYCAuburn
The co-divisional championship claims seemed to be popular during the Tuberville days.
Could've been outright divisional champions more often if we didn't lose the stupid games so I never thought much of them.
Could've been outright divisional champions more often if we didn't lose the stupid games so I never thought much of them.
Posted on 4/20/17 at 9:38 am to Cheese Grits
99 % of our data was pulled by SQL straight from their website.
Posted on 4/20/17 at 9:39 am to LSUNV
quote:
99 % of our data was pulled by SQL straight from their website.
So LSU doesnt control the content of their media or create graphics for their media?
This post was edited on 4/20/17 at 9:41 am
Posted on 4/20/17 at 9:41 am to jangalang
quote:
The co-divisional championship claims seemed to be popular during the Tuberville days
We were close, but lost the ones that mattered in the head to heads
Page 2 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News