Started By
Message
re: Does Missouri have the staying power?
Posted on 2/9/15 at 11:02 pm to Vols&Shaft83
Posted on 2/9/15 at 11:02 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
Interesting, you got any proof?
Seriously?
I mean, seriously?
How fricking in-denial are you on a scale of 1-10 with 10 being pathological? A 20?
2
Posted on 2/9/15 at 11:05 pm to scrooster
Doesn't appear that you have any proof, I am disappoint
Posted on 2/9/15 at 11:06 pm to kilo
quote:
switches to performance in the title game.
And that doesn't even get told accurately. Bama wasn't close. Auburn actually was close and was not a blowout.
Posted on 2/9/15 at 11:06 pm to scrooster
scrooster, you are talking to VFL types. The Vols faithful have very few peers among other fan bases when it comes to levels of delusion they believe.
Posted on 2/9/15 at 11:08 pm to kilo
Stay out of this Kilo, go loot a convenience store
Posted on 2/9/15 at 11:09 pm to BigOrangeBri
quote:
Ask anyone that followed the SEC East. It was a a beast compared to what it's been the past couple of years.
No. UT, UF and UGA was a beast compared to the past couple of years. Now it's been UGA, SC and MU that's been a beast.
Posted on 2/9/15 at 11:09 pm to reedus23
4 SEC title games since it was announced that Mizzou was joing the SEC.
2011 LSU 42 Georgia 12
2012 Alabama 32 Georgia 28
2013 Auburn 59 Mizzou 42
2014 Alabama 42 Mizzou 13
2011 LSU 42 Georgia 12
2012 Alabama 32 Georgia 28
2013 Auburn 59 Mizzou 42
2014 Alabama 42 Mizzou 13
Posted on 2/9/15 at 11:10 pm to reedus23
quote:
No. UT, UF and UGA was a beast compared to the past couple of years. Now it's been UGA, SC and MU that's been a beast.
This is the disconnect. It amazes me that folks cant wrap their heads around this simple stuff.
Posted on 2/9/15 at 11:11 pm to kilo
Looks to me like UGA had the big arse kicking. Not Mizzou. Glad you looked that up. Would not have known with the way others talk.
Posted on 2/9/15 at 11:11 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
Vols&Shaft83
Go buy some shoes for your kids.
Posted on 2/9/15 at 11:13 pm to kilo
That's it, fight me irl, 8 AM, burnt down Sonic in Ferguson
Posted on 2/9/15 at 11:13 pm to kilo
quote:
This is the disconnect. It amazes me that folks cant wrap their heads around this simple stuff.
I don't get it either. I tried to understand the train of thought by comparing it to the Cardinals but even that doesn't compute. When the Cubs win the Central, I don't automatically go to the statement that the Central was down. My first reaction is that the Cards were down, not the entire division. I just don't get it.
Posted on 2/9/15 at 11:14 pm to Vols&Shaft83
gonna have to be a QT or Mcdonalds.
Posted on 2/9/15 at 11:14 pm to GoldenDawg
quote:
I mean, has there ever been another SECE Champ that got trucked at home 34-0 by a fellow SECE team like Mizzou did against Georgia last season?
It was on the road but UGA did get thrashed by South Carolina in 2012 to the tune of 35-7.
It wasn't an SEC game but 2011 UGA got thumped by Boise State 35-21 in the Georgia Dome.
In 2010 South Carolina lost to Arkansas 41-20 at home.
2007 Tennessee lost two road games, one to Florida 59-20 and one to Alabama 41-17
2004 Tennessee lost at home to 34-10.
I got bored and stopped looking but it seems to me while there hasn't been a 34-0 beatdown, there have been plenty of SECE champs that got their arse whipped pretty good.
Posted on 2/9/15 at 11:14 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
Sonic in Ferguson
It was a QT. Sonic knew better than to go there in the first place.
Posted on 2/9/15 at 11:14 pm to kilo
quote:
Vols&Shaft83
Go buy some shoes for your kids.
Sick frickin' burn.
V&S, I know where to get some aloe for that burn. It's locally sourced and organic.
Posted on 2/9/15 at 11:14 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
burnt down Sonic in Ferguson
They prefer the term "slightly singed," sir
Posted on 2/9/15 at 11:14 pm to reedus23
quote:
No. UT, UF and UGA was a beast compared to the past couple of years. Now it's been UGA, SC and MU that's been a beast.
Yes, the teams are different, but they're not at an elite level that those UGA, UF and UT teams were.
Go back, watch some games.
Posted on 2/9/15 at 11:17 pm to reedus23
quote:
I don't get it either. I tried to understand the train of thought by comparing it to the Cardinals but even that doesn't compute. When the Cubs win the Central, I don't automatically go to the statement that the Central was down. My first reaction is that the Cards were down, not the entire division. I just don't get it.
The only thing I think that makes sense is that the SEC was in the height of the "SEC SEC SEC" era lording over college football when Mizzou and aTm were announced as expansion schools. Having a Big 12 team come in a win the division 2 of 3 years has played hell with some of their beliefs.
Posted on 2/9/15 at 11:17 pm to BigOrangeBri
quote:
Go back, watch some games.
I watched them back then. Not as closely but enough. Enough to know that in more years than not, there weren't 2 teams in the top 5. And I prefer not to watch Tebow teams anymore than I have to.
Page 4 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News