Started By
Message
0
Posted on 8/9/13 at 1:27 pm to elit4ce05
I love the holier than thou types like you. He was a 17 year old minor Senior in high school who got a consensual blowjob from a 14 year old freshman. He got hit for something that happens at every fricking high school in America, just so happened he got his arse caught up by uppity white parents who couldnt have their precious baby blowing a brother. You are seriously a pretentious douchebag.
Posted on 8/9/13 at 1:28 pm to elit4ce05
(no message)
This post was edited on 12/31/21 at 10:19 pm
Posted on 8/9/13 at 1:28 pm to elit4ce05
quote:
Not seeing that part you posted
not sure if serious
Posted on 8/9/13 at 1:29 pm to toosleaux
quote:
He was a 17 year old minor Senior in high school who got a consensual blowjob from a 14 year old freshman
all of this is why its a misdemeanor and not a felony
Posted on 8/9/13 at 1:30 pm to elit4ce05
quote:
But it is.... just because you don't agree with the law does not give you or anyone else to break those laws. Same with legal drinking age and the such. Even if you don't agree,,,it's still the law.
Your correct. The law is the law. And the legal system took a look at the case and brought down the hammer on Hill ... the legal system gave him exactly what they felt he deserved: Probation.
So quit acting like Hill is some perverted criminal that deserves 25toLife for getting a BJ from a freshman while he was a senior.
There are cases that warrant the "pervert" card being thrown out, no question about it. But this is not one of them.
This post was edited on 8/9/13 at 1:32 pm
Posted on 8/9/13 at 1:30 pm to ProjectP2294
this didn't happen?
(1) The touching of the anus or genitals of the victim by the offender using the mouth or tongue of the offender; or
(2) The touching of the anus or genitals of the offender by the victim using the mouth or tongue of the victim.
So what is this BJ of which you speak?
(1) The touching of the anus or genitals of the victim by the offender using the mouth or tongue of the offender; or
(2) The touching of the anus or genitals of the offender by the victim using the mouth or tongue of the victim.
So what is this BJ of which you speak?
Posted on 8/9/13 at 1:31 pm to NYCAuburn
Was she a white girl?
If so, I hope she realizes she will never go back.
If that was her first hummer, she will never appreciate to subtleties of the white c*&k.
If so, I hope she realizes she will never go back.
If that was her first hummer, she will never appreciate to subtleties of the white c*&k.
This post was edited on 8/9/13 at 1:33 pm
Posted on 8/9/13 at 1:32 pm to elit4ce05
quote:
this didn't happen?
(1) The touching of the anus or genitals of the victim by the offender using the mouth or tongue of the offender; or
(2) The touching of the anus or genitals of the offender by the victim using the mouth or tongue of the victim.
So what is this BJ of which you speak?
I'm serious with this question, are you fricking stupid?
Oral sexual battery requires a lack of consent.
Posted on 8/9/13 at 1:32 pm to parkjas2001
quote:
If that was her first hummer
It wasn't.
Posted on 8/9/13 at 1:33 pm to ProjectP2294
Either he is a troll or just plain fricking stupid.
Posted on 8/9/13 at 1:33 pm to JPLSU1981
Think you or I would have been given that same option? Do you think he would have been given that same option if he were tried in a different state or wasn't a "star" player on the team? of course not. You or I would be looking at 10 years prison a lifetime registration as a sex offender.
Posted on 8/9/13 at 1:33 pm to elit4ce05
quote:
So what is this BJ of which you speak?
lol... man you sure are vocal about a case you've just made it clear that you know nothing about.
Posted on 8/9/13 at 1:33 pm to ProjectP2294
So in October, she will be 17.
Posted on 8/9/13 at 1:34 pm to ProjectP2294
So none of that happened happen?
Posted on 8/9/13 at 1:35 pm to elit4ce05
quote:
So none of that happened happen?
Once again, are you fricking stupid?
Posted on 8/9/13 at 1:35 pm to JPLSU1981
So first you say it did happen then you say it didn't...sheesh.
Posted on 8/9/13 at 1:35 pm to elit4ce05
quote:
Do you think he would have been given that same option if he were tried in a different state or wasn't a "star" player on the team?
A star player on what team? Remdemptorist HS?
Posted on 8/9/13 at 1:35 pm to elit4ce05
If it was proven to be consensual, which it was, you or I couldnt be charged with that either because thats how the law is written you stupid frick.
Posted on 8/9/13 at 1:35 pm to elit4ce05
quote:
elit4ce05
this is what he is guilty of
quote:
§80.1. Misdemeanor carnal knowledge of a juvenile
A. Misdemeanor carnal knowledge of a juvenile is committed when a person who is seventeen years of age or older has sexual intercourse, with consent, with a person who is thirteen years of age or older but less than seventeen years of age, when the victim is not the spouse of the offender, and when the difference between the age of the victim and age of the offender is greater than two years, but less than four years.
B. As used in this Section, "sexual intercourse" means anal, oral, or vaginal sexual intercourse.
C. Lack of knowledge of the juvenile's age shall not be a defense. Emission is not necessary, and penetration, however slight, is sufficient to complete the crime.
D. Whoever commits the crime of misdemeanor carnal knowledge of a juvenile shall be fined not more than one thousand dollars, or imprisoned for not more than six months, or both.
E. The offender shall be eligible to have his conviction set aside and his prosecution dismissed in accordance with the appropriate provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
F. The offender shall not be subject to any of the provisions of law which are applicable to sex offenders, including but not limited to the provisions which require registration of the offender and notice to the neighbors of the offender.
Acts 2001, No. 796, §1; Acts 2008, No. 331, §1.
not felony oral battery
Page 6 of 8
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News