Started By
Message
re: Chubb vs Fournette 2016
Posted on 7/27/16 at 2:11 pm to whodatigahbait
Posted on 7/27/16 at 2:11 pm to whodatigahbait
quote:
And no athletes are allowed to get injured
a comma makes all the difference
quote:
My point in this case is the the fact that LF7 was on the field while chubb wasn't makes him better. You can't say well if chubb had not gotten hurt he'd be better than LF7. The fact that he did get hurt and is not as durable at position that takes a beating makes LF7 the better more desirable back.
I thought your point was that the great ones don't get hurt. Because that's exactly what you said. Now you're just changing your argument.
1
Posted on 7/27/16 at 2:11 pm to djsdawg
Yeah man u pretty much won the debate. Nick Chubb is a better runningback than Leonard Fournette because Les Miles doesn't utilize his backup runningback enough.
Just f*ckin with ya man
But LF is the best rb in the country and everybody knows it. Deep down you know it too
Just f*ckin with ya man
But LF is the best rb in the country and everybody knows it. Deep down you know it too
Posted on 7/27/16 at 2:11 pm to RB10
quote:
Don't make me post it a 3rd time. We're all waiting for the mental gymnastics.
quote:
What was such a good point? That Les doesn't give the ball to his backups enough? Seriously man?
Sony M had 7 tds.
LSU #2 had 0 tds.
Notice anything obvious?
Posted on 7/27/16 at 2:14 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Deflection is all you really got. Try to focus on RB's from this generation than RB's from 2 generations ago. The point I made about differing offensive systems remains well above your level of understanding, so its pointless to discuss any further.
Someone doesn't like their comment of padding stats being thrown back into their face.
385 for 1891 (4.91) and 18 TDs.
335 for 1752 (5.23) and 16 TDs.
395 for 2219 (5.62) and 28 TDs.
One is tGOAT. The other just padded stats. I'll repeat my earlier statement. You.Are.A.Joke.
Posted on 7/27/16 at 2:16 pm to djsdawg
How in the world does that have anything to do with the comparison of LF and Chubb??? And Guice has 3 touchdowns. And hes better than Sony.
Posted on 7/27/16 at 2:17 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Sony M had 7 tds.
1. Sony had 8 TDs.
2. Half of them came after Chubb got hurt.
quote:
LSU #2 had 0 tds.
Well, Guice had 3. Harris had 4. Williams had 4. Who exactly is LSU's #2?
This post was edited on 7/27/16 at 2:18 pm
Posted on 7/27/16 at 2:18 pm to RB10
OT:
UGA Crew: When is the yearly prediction thread coming? Can't remember which one of yous conducts that.
UGA Crew: When is the yearly prediction thread coming? Can't remember which one of yous conducts that.
Posted on 7/27/16 at 2:19 pm to TheJones
I'm pretty sure WG_Dawg does it.
Posted on 7/27/16 at 2:20 pm to djsdawg
Posted on 7/27/16 at 2:22 pm to RB10
quote:
I'm pretty sure WG_Dawg does it.
'tis I.
It's been starting earlier and earlier, I was going to wait until about the middle of next week. I would prefer to get into August.
Or hell, I've got free time Sunday so might start it on the 31st.
Posted on 7/27/16 at 2:25 pm to WG_Dawg
Posted on 7/27/16 at 2:26 pm to TheJones
i'm pumped. Means football is just around the corner 
Posted on 7/27/16 at 2:27 pm to WG_Dawg
It has become part of my football experience each fall.
Posted on 7/27/16 at 2:34 pm to I-H8-BAMA
quote:
How in the world does that have anything to do with the comparison of LF and Chubb???
RB10 made a point that LF had 4 more TD's than Chubb in the september comparison, but Chubb was sharing the TD's with a 2nd RB unlike LF, so its not a meaningful point.
Posted on 7/27/16 at 2:36 pm to djsdawg
"Doesn't benefit the UGA player.....Irrelevant! "
It's especially funny because you brought up the September games, and wanted to do away with the bad teams, because you thought it was going to help your argument.
Now that it hasn't it's meaningless numbers.......fricking. You can't make this shite up.
It's especially funny because you brought up the September games, and wanted to do away with the bad teams, because you thought it was going to help your argument.
Now that it hasn't it's meaningless numbers.......fricking
. You can't make this shite up.This post was edited on 7/27/16 at 2:40 pm
Posted on 7/27/16 at 2:44 pm to RB10
quote:
One is tGOAT. The other just padded stats.
It was bad enough that you didnt understand the benefits of a wish bone offense, but attempting to equate a modern offense led by Lane Kiffin to an antiquated 80's offense is on a whole different level of cluelessness. That is far from a credible comparison.
I think deflation like you keep on repeating is a cowardly sign of defeat, so keep it up if you wish, but If there is a threat to discuss the 80's, its not one with 2016 in the title.
Posted on 7/27/16 at 2:46 pm to gatorhata9
quote:
quote:
And no athletes are allowed to get injured
a comma makes all the difference
grammar police strike again
quote:
quote:
My point in this case is the the fact that LF7 was on the field while chubb wasn't makes him better. You can't say well if chubb had not gotten hurt he'd be better than LF7. The fact that he did get hurt and is not as durable at position that takes a beating makes LF7 the better more desirable back.
I thought your point was that the great ones don't get hurt. Because that's exactly what you said. Now you're just changing your argument.
Go read my posts and see the first example i used of Tiger. Clearly he is great. Just not the greatest.
Posted on 7/27/16 at 2:50 pm to RB10
quote:
It's especially funny because you brought up the September games, and wanted to do away with the bad teams, because you thought it was going to help your argument.
Now that it hasn't it's meaningless numbers.......fricking . You can't make this shite up.
I wanted to do away with a best vs worst disparity because thats obviously unfair. You wanted to include it because you need unfair to even come close to making your point, and removing Southern still didnt make your point as it barely made a different in the YPC stat.
Posted on 7/27/16 at 2:50 pm to djsdawg
quote:
It was bad enough that you didnt understand the benefits of a wish bone offense, but attempting to equate a modern offense led by Lane Kiffin to an antiquated 80's offense is on a whole different level of cluelessness. That is far from a credible comparison.
I think deflation like you keep on repeating is a cowardly sign of defeat, so keep it up if you wish, but If there is a threat to discuss the 80's, its not one with 2016 in the title.
El
Oh
fricking
El
Spin little fella, spin.
Page 15 of 18
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News