Started By
Message

re: Chubb vs Fournette 2016

Posted on 7/27/16 at 1:39 pm to
Posted by I-H8-BAMA
Benton, Louisiana
Member since Jan 2013
10427 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 1:39 pm to
RB10 is killing this dude

I know this doesn't matter to anyone but literally every single article written by college football "experts" has LF ahead of Nick Chubb. I could see it being written off if only a couple articles have LF ahead of Chubb but 99% if not 100 % of them? Seems to me that maybe, just MAYBE, Leonard Fournette is a better rb than Nick Chubb. Crazy, I know.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
43805 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

How about you address the point I made BEFORE that post before we move on?


This nonsense:

quote:

Simply Getting more carries doesn't necessarily make a rb better. It just means they got more Carries out of necessity due to no credible backup rb, which pads overall stats. Lsu fans like you have made the same point often when comparing Henry and fournette, so you know the point is credible. Funny you are trying to argue against it now. Makes you look like a hypocrite.


I've said Henry was better than Fournette last year and deserved the Heisman. Check my post history if you don't believe me.

Something you are flat out unable to do with Fournette, which makes it hilarious you're calling me a hypocrite. We're talking about the guy who uses YPC, until it doesn't benefit a UGA player, and who ignores total carries when comparing YPC, until it benefits a UGA player.

You.Are.A.Joke

If you want to be taken seriously, pick a criteria and stick with it. Changing what matters with each post makes you look utterly foolish.

Moving on now....
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
32817 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

I know this doesn't matter to anyone but literally every single article written by college football "experts" has LF ahead of Nick Chubb.


You never responded to my response to this from yesterday:

quote:

Everyone thinks that and has always thought that, but the facts never seem to support it.


Facts > articles and recruiting rankings
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
32817 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

ETA: Here are the numbers using your cherry picked criteria of September and no bad teams:

Fournette: 73 for 631. 8 TDs.
Chubb: 56 for 468. 4 TDs.


I wonder how we need to change it now?


Thats fair and it drops Chubb from 8.44 ypc all the way down to 8.36 ypc. Sorry man, still not the major disparity you claimed. Whats your next strategy?
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
43805 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

Thats fair and it drops Chubb from 8.44 ypc all the way down to 8.36 ypc. Sorry man, still not the major disparity you claimed. Whats your next strategy?


160 yards and 4 TDs through only 3 notwithstanding, right?

Posted by I-H8-BAMA
Benton, Louisiana
Member since Jan 2013
10427 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 1:50 pm to
The fact is that LF is the better runningback. I've said it about 10 times now. There's nothing you can possibly say that will make me think otherwise. Chubb is a very good back, hell maybe even great if he can come back this year and look the same. I just think LF is on another level.
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
32817 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

I've said Henry was better than Fournette last year,


So you have a history of making poor points. Too bad. I will have to give every other LSU fan besides you credit for making a credible point about Henry padding his stats by getting so many carries.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
43805 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

So you have a history of making poor points. Too bad.


You try to use Henry to call me a hypocrite, fail miserably, and come up with this shite? You're flapping in the wind here buddy.


quote:

I will have to give every other LSU fan besides you credit for making a credible point about Henry padding his stats by getting so many carries.




Like Herschel and Bo, right?

Let's hear the spin about scheme.......GO!
This post was edited on 7/27/16 at 1:54 pm
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
32817 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

160 yards and 4 TDs through only 3 notwithstanding, right?



That proves Chubb, unlike LF, gave up some TD's and carries to a 2nd RB. Congrats on Les not utilizing a 2nd RB.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
43805 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 1:56 pm to
quote:


That proves Chubb, unlike LF, gave up some TD's and carries to a 2nd RB. Congrats on Les not utilizing a 2nd RB.


Posted by I-H8-BAMA
Benton, Louisiana
Member since Jan 2013
10427 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

That proves Chubb, unlike LF, gave up some TD's and carries to a 2nd RB. Congrats on Les not utilizing a 2nd RB.


You're losing steam buddy.
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86442 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 1:56 pm to
oh this is still going on?

One more month folks and this'll all be over.
Posted by I-H8-BAMA
Benton, Louisiana
Member since Jan 2013
10427 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 1:58 pm to
Can't fk'n wait!
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
32817 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

You try to use Henry to call me a hypocrite, fail miserably, and come up with this shite? You're flapping in the wind here buddy.


Since nearly every LSU fan has made that really good point, I assumed you did too. My fail there, but meaningless in the grand scheme. Make no mistake, you failing to make that really good point is the relevant miserable fail.
Posted by I-H8-BAMA
Benton, Louisiana
Member since Jan 2013
10427 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

Since nearly every LSU fan has made that really good point, I assumed you did too. My fail there, but meaningless in the grand scheme. Make no mistake, you failing to make that really good point is the relevant miserable fail


Go home djsdawg, you're drunk.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
43805 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

Since nearly every LSU fan has made that really good point, I assumed you did too. My fail there, but meaningless in the grand scheme. Make no mistake, you failing to make that really good point is the relevant miserable fail.


It's such a good point until we get to Herschel vs. Bo.

quote:

Let's hear the spin about scheme.......GO!
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
32817 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

You're losing steam buddy.


You got it backwards. Its such a good point, the only thing RB could do was post a useless gif in response.
Posted by I-H8-BAMA
Benton, Louisiana
Member since Jan 2013
10427 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 2:05 pm to
What was such a good point? That Les doesn't give the ball to his backups enough? Seriously man?
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
43805 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

ou got it backwards. Its such a good point, the only thing RB could do was post a useless gif in response.


Don't make me post it a 3rd time. We're all waiting for the mental gymnastics.
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
32817 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

Herschel vs. Bo.


Deflection is all you really got. Try to focus on RB's from this generation than RB's from 2 generations ago. The point I made about differing offensive systems remains well above your level of understanding, so its pointless to discuss any further.
Jump to page
Page First 12 13 14 15 16 ... 18
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 14 of 18Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter