Started By
Message
re: Chubb vs Fournette 2016
Posted on 7/27/16 at 3:50 pm to RB10
Posted on 7/27/16 at 3:50 pm to RB10
He's fighting so hard for Chubb. Quite admirable! He's just not better than Fournette man. Everybody and their dog agrees LF is the best back in the country. But what'ya know? Hes not even the best back in his conference! Everybody is wrong and you're right. Just give it up pal. 
0
Posted on 7/27/16 at 3:51 pm to bamaqna
Didn't you see? If Bama can take a no talent jack off and pad his stats all the way to a heisman.
Healthy Chubb and Fournette may end up getting the NFL offensive MVP. They would just be that incredible. Well, maybe Chubb. Fournette is a no talent jack off too apparently.
Healthy Chubb and Fournette may end up getting the NFL offensive MVP. They would just be that incredible. Well, maybe Chubb. Fournette is a no talent jack off too apparently.
Posted on 7/27/16 at 3:52 pm to RB10
quote:
You've shite on every non-UGA player brought up and gone full homer fricktard by cherry picking stats and spinning narratives to favor each individual argument.
Reducing things to Apples vs apples is not cherry picking. In response to my logical and objective points, you have either ignored the point or lacked an understanding of the point, and moved onto deflection onto irrelevant topics such as the 80's, and then reducing yourself to accusing me of cherry picking even though you dont quite understand what it means.
This post was edited on 7/27/16 at 3:53 pm
Posted on 7/27/16 at 4:00 pm to RB10
quote:
If Bama can take a no talent jack off and pad his stats all the way to a heisman.
your denigration of Derrick Henry's Talent is laughable you will see that talent on display this season baww just get your 
readyPosted on 7/27/16 at 4:01 pm to djsdawg
quote:
In response to my logical and objective points,
quote:
my logical and objective points
quote:
logical and objective
quote:
logical
quote:
objective
Posted on 7/27/16 at 4:04 pm to texag7
Stats dont tell the whole story. Like the fact that Fournette barely ran the ball in the seconds half to rest up. Instead Guice got 16 carries for 161 yds and was leading rusher. Theres more than the stat line shows
Posted on 7/27/16 at 4:08 pm to RB10
Right on cue with a gif. Next up is 1980 something.
We dont have to go far for a logical and objective point that you didnt get. My point about Sony taking scores away was a legit one, and you posted a gif in response.
We dont have to go far for a logical and objective point that you didnt get. My point about Sony taking scores away was a legit one, and you posted a gif in response.
Posted on 7/27/16 at 4:10 pm to djsdawg
quote:
We dont have to go far for a logical and objective point that you didnt get
Again with "logical" and "objective"?
Posted on 7/27/16 at 4:12 pm to BeauxNArreaux
quote:
Stats dont tell the whole story. Like the fact that Fournette barely ran the ball in the seconds half to rest up. Instead Guice got 16 carries for 161 yds and was leading rusher. Theres more than the stat line shows
20 carries in one half is more than the average SEC RB takes per game.
Posted on 7/27/16 at 4:18 pm to RB10
The sony michel point fits those 2 words well as it used an objective stat and I explained in a logical manner how it negatively affected his teammates stat.
Sadly, it went over your head. Its okay for you though, the thread has been anchored.
Sadly, it went over your head. Its okay for you though, the thread has been anchored.
This post was edited on 7/27/16 at 4:20 pm
Posted on 7/27/16 at 4:23 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Sadly, it went over your head. Its okay for you though, the thread has been anchored.
quote:
-Chubb vs. Fournette = YPC
-Herschel vs. Bo = Total yards. YPC now meaning because.......scheme.
-Herschel vs. Henry = Era played in. Total yards, TDs and YPC now meaningless. Similar scheme now irrelevant.
"Logical" & "Objective"
Just happens to coincide with the UGA player always coming out on top.
Posted on 7/27/16 at 4:34 pm to RB10
Logical to compare Chubb and LF YPC due to similar schemes.
Illogical to compare Herschel vs Henry and Bo due to different schemes.
Thats consistent logic. Whats also consistent is you avoiding or not understanding every single point about schemes.
The funniest thing about all of this is that I never even said herschel came out on top in those comparisons because thats irrelevant to the thread.
Illogical to compare Herschel vs Henry and Bo due to different schemes.
Thats consistent logic. Whats also consistent is you avoiding or not understanding every single point about schemes.
The funniest thing about all of this is that I never even said herschel came out on top in those comparisons because thats irrelevant to the thread.
Posted on 7/27/16 at 4:40 pm to djsdawg
quote:
The funniest thing about all of this is that I never even said herschel came out on top in those comparisons because thats irrelevant to the thread.
Nah, you just tried to prove I was a hypocrite in regards to Henry, failed, and in doing so shite on Herschel with your "padding stats" comment.
Have a good day Homer. Next time you see me in a thread, at least try not to shite on your own previous statements.
This post was edited on 7/27/16 at 4:41 pm
Posted on 7/27/16 at 4:43 pm to djsdawg
Dude who gives a damn about what scheme the rb is in? YPC is relevant in any decade to compare. U get the ball and u try to get yards. The wishbone doesn't make the rb start off 10 yards behind the line of scrimmage or anything. It's a weak argument.
Posted on 7/27/16 at 4:45 pm to RB10
quote:
ou just tried to prove I was a hypocrite in regards to Henry, failed, and in doing so shite on Herschel with your "padding stats" comment.
Whats funny is that I never said HW's pads were NOT padded due to excessive carries, and then I agreed they were, so I never shat on any previous statement.
Posted on 7/27/16 at 4:48 pm to I-H8-BAMA
quote:
Dude who gives a damn about what scheme the rb is in?
Schemes can affect stats. The wish bone is an option offense. That means defenders have to key on multiple threats in the backfield at once rather than focusing their efforts on one guy. If you played Ga Tech, you would understand the advantages that can create for an offense. Maybe you will get it, but RB10 has avoided that logical point like the plague.
Posted on 7/27/16 at 4:49 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Whats funny is that I never said HW's pads were NOT padded due to excessive carries, and then I agreed they were, so I never shat on any previous statement.
And you're talking about things going over other people's heads.
quote:
logical
Again with this word. Seriously, Websters Dictionary. Invest in one.
This post was edited on 7/27/16 at 4:52 pm
Posted on 7/27/16 at 4:58 pm to RB10
quote:
talking about things going over other people's heads.
I understand you are attempting to make an illogical point based off things you claim I said but never actually said. If not, explain otherwise.
Posted on 7/27/16 at 4:58 pm to RB10
Posted on 7/27/16 at 4:59 pm to RB10
quote:
Again with this word. Seriously, Websters Dictionary. Invest in one
The burden is on you to explain a lack of logic. Try to poke a logic hole in my sony Michel point.
Page 17 of 18
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News