Started By
Message
re: Charles Robinson of Yahoo! stating that NCAA will most likely not pursue
Posted on 9/12/13 at 2:53 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Posted on 9/12/13 at 2:53 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
I hate Alabama as much or more than anyone but I have no problem with DJ Fluker or Mark Barron getting a little spending money advance on their NFL signing bonus.
Funneling money under the table to a recruit to attend school A over school B is a different story but there's no suggestion of that here.
quote:
Draconian Sanctions
Hell Baby needs shoes & diapers!!!
0
Posted on 9/12/13 at 2:54 pm to NBamaAlum
Auburn set the precedence, they got away with it and now they all want a piece of the pie.
The NCAA use to put programs on the death penalty for stuff like this. Now with them controlling their own networks and the money they receive they till the NCAA what to do. Kind of like when the real SEC banking regulatory use to tell the banks what to do.
I do not know when or how this all got out of control but it is. It is a money grab and everyone is out for themselves.
The NCAA use to put programs on the death penalty for stuff like this. Now with them controlling their own networks and the money they receive they till the NCAA what to do. Kind of like when the real SEC banking regulatory use to tell the banks what to do.
I do not know when or how this all got out of control but it is. It is a money grab and everyone is out for themselves.
Posted on 9/12/13 at 2:55 pm to HawgAlude
quote:?
Auburn set the precedence
Posted on 9/12/13 at 2:55 pm to bmy
quote:
What is silly about punishing schools for playing ineligible players?
Posted on 9/12/13 at 2:56 pm to Beer Bryant
but i'm not rustled this has been a great day. i can put on my trollface
this has been a great day. i can put on my trollface
Posted on 9/12/13 at 2:56 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
I have no problem with DJ Fluker or Mark Barron getting a little spending money advance on their NFL signing bonus.
Funneling money under the table to a recruit to attend school A over school B is a different story but there's no suggestion of that here.
I still have a problem with them breaking the rules. But, yeah, punishing the school for it is nonsense.
Posted on 9/12/13 at 2:57 pm to NBamaAlum
quote:
Its just gas.
I'm a modern Nostradamus, better hope I fart soon!
Posted on 9/12/13 at 2:57 pm to HawgAlude
quote:
Auburn set the precedence, they got away with it
What exactly did Auburn do again?
Posted on 9/12/13 at 2:59 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
What exactly did Auburn do again?
Went 0-fer in SEC play.
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:00 pm to Adam Banks
Screw that I don't want the gumps punished for this BS, anymore than I thought OSU should be punished for free Tatoos. Now Tressel covered it up that is why they got hammered
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:00 pm to NBamaAlum
quote:
Its just gas.
Ha - just gas - funny
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:00 pm to NBamaAlum
quote:
Went 0-fer in SEC play.
I for one welcome whatever new rules and regulations keep this travesty from ever happening again.
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:00 pm to bmy
quote:
What is silly about punishing schools for playing ineligible players?
pretty much every ncaa game from last year in which a draft pick played had someone playing that got money from an agent.
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:01 pm to Teague
quote:
I still have a problem with them breaking the rules. But, yeah, punishing the school for it is nonsense.
Then who can the NCAA punish over this rule being broken? Can't punish Fluker now so what should happen? Vacate games the only option?
This post was edited on 9/12/13 at 3:02 pm
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:05 pm to i am dan
There was no evidence on Cam idiots this has a paper trail.
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:06 pm to i am dan
Bo Mattingly said that the NCAA does not have the attornies or compliance staffers to pursue this like they use to and the schools, especially the ones cheating, hire former NCAA attornies and thus are always 2-3 steps ahead.
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:07 pm to i am dan
Great Avi!
"Caption" - I Run Trick Playz Biatch!!!
"Caption" - I Run Trick Playz Biatch!!!
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:09 pm to taylormade
Charles Robinson is stating the NCAA has no authority to bring in people that are not in the NCAA anymore. And to prove what the school knew what was going on is also very hard to prove outside of USCw.
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:14 pm to SanJoseTigerFan
So Charles Robinson respected journalist can come up with evidence and cannot be used, but 100,000 bammers can email ncaa and AU is investigated over and over again. Sounds about right for the inbred nation and ncaa.
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:16 pm to SanJoseTigerFan
quote:
And to prove what the school knew what was going on is also very hard to prove outside of USCw.
In USCw's case, the NCAA didn't/couldn't prove the school knew. They used the term "should have known".
They also said "high-profile players demand high-profile enforcement." But the NCAA has never used either of these phrases before the Bush thing or after. So who knows the hell the NCAA will do. Probably nothing.
This post was edited on 9/12/13 at 3:17 pm
Page 2 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News