Started By
Message
1
Posted on 6/4/12 at 10:25 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
Neb and OK is a little bit different, wouldnt you say?
How so?
Posted on 6/4/12 at 10:26 am to JPLSU1981
They were 1-1 against one of the members. I seem to remember one loss being much more significant than the other. 
Posted on 6/4/12 at 10:26 am to Lacour
quote:
Still got taken away though.
That doesn't mean it was the right move.
There are permanent, cross-division games in the SEC, Big Ten, and Pac 12 now.
This post was edited on 6/4/12 at 10:26 am
Posted on 6/4/12 at 10:26 am to Lacour
quote:
How so?
they are no longer in the same conference
Posted on 6/4/12 at 10:26 am to Lacour
Did people complain this much about only one rotational opponent before we switched the format in the early 2000s?
Posted on 6/4/12 at 10:27 am to Lacour
quote:Pimpin' ain't easy.
Don't be ridiculous. It's not a big four. It's a big 1.
Posted on 6/4/12 at 10:27 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
they are no longer in the same conference
Dude, you do know that nebraska and oklahoma were huge rivals, played each other EVERY year, and stopped the series when the Big 12 was formed in the mid 90s.
Right? You do know that, right?
Posted on 6/4/12 at 10:28 am to sarc
quote:
I believe the vote was 11-3 in favor of the 6-1-1. Democracy has spoken
Those East teams love the fact that they don't have to face all the world beaters in the West every year. I'd vote like a pussy too if I was USC and UGA.
Posted on 6/4/12 at 10:28 am to 12
quote:
They were 1-1 against one of the members. I seem to remember one loss being much more significant than the other
They were both pretty significant, but one had a trophy presentation after it. That said, I have blocked out January 2012 anyway, so IMO January 2012 never happened.
Posted on 6/4/12 at 10:28 am to jatebe
quote:
Why not move Tennessee to the west and Auburn to the east. I would rather play Tennessee every year and don't care if we ever play Auburn again. Plus Auburn could continue their rivalry with Georgia and Florida.
Because regardless of what people here say, neither Alabama or Auburn would be wiling to give up the Iron Bowl, and the SEC wouldn't want that, either.
This post was edited on 6/4/12 at 10:31 am
Posted on 6/4/12 at 10:28 am to JPLSU1981
The reality is TN sucks, why would they want to lose a game to Bama every year!?!?! I am not scared of playing UF, the question is why would they want to play us every year?
Who cares about UGA and Auburn
Who cares about UGA and Auburn
Posted on 6/4/12 at 10:29 am to TigersRuleTheEarth
quote:
Those East teams love the fact that they don't have to face all the world beaters in the West every year.
Yeah, Tennessee hates competition.
Posted on 6/4/12 at 10:29 am to JPLSU1981
quote:
They were both pretty significant, but one had a trophy presentation after it. That said, I have blocked out January 2012 anyway, so IMO January 2012 never happened.
That's right.
That game was in 2012. LSU defeated all the Big 4 in 2011.
2012 doesn't count.
Posted on 6/4/12 at 10:30 am to TigersRuleTheEarth
quote:
Those East teams love the fact that they don't have to face all the world beaters in the West every year. I'd vote like a pussy too if I was USC and UGA
So everyone voted in their own self-interest and LSU lost. Why are we still talking about this?
Posted on 6/4/12 at 10:30 am to tigerfan0082
quote:Dumbest post of the thread, hands down.
The reality is TN sucks, why would they want to lose a game to Bama every year!?!?!
>implying UT will always be terrible
Posted on 6/4/12 at 10:30 am to Lacour
Big 4? is that even a often used term? I think the only term is big 6.
Posted on 6/4/12 at 10:31 am to ohiovol
quote:
Because regardless of what people here say, neither Alabama, Auburn, or the SEC would be willing to give up the Iron Bowl.
of course not. could you imagine the panty wadding and belly aching over giving up that game?
I mean, Bama is having a fit over Tennessee.
Tennessee for god's sake.
Posted on 6/4/12 at 10:32 am to ohiovol
quote:
Yeah, Tennessee hates competition
Right now yall should be worried about competing in your own division much less taking on Bama, LSU, AU, and Arky.
Posted on 6/4/12 at 10:33 am to sarc
quote:
Why are we still talking about this?
Because the resulting schedule for the SEC's future sucks balls. Keep up.
Page 4 of 18
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News