Started By
Message
re: Auburn vs Clemson over the decades
Posted on 7/9/15 at 10:42 pm to Jamie Lannister
Posted on 7/9/15 at 10:42 pm to Jamie Lannister
quote:
i'd settle for winning ACC title, we need to do that more consistently, given people tend to say Clemson is 2nd best program in the conference.
Y'all could win the ACC but still lose to South Carolina. They own y'all. It's a domination.
Posted on 7/9/15 at 10:42 pm to Jamie Lannister
Clemson is just Auburn on a lake. Congrats on your last win against Auburn. Not many of teams got the best of Keihl Frazier
Posted on 7/9/15 at 10:44 pm to Jamie Lannister
frick Clemson! Just the fact that you constantly hang around an SEC board seeking respect shows how pathetic you are. Respect that you are likely never going to find.
I am going to go out on a limb and say most people here don't care how many conference championships any ACC team has won because the entire conference is a joke.
As far as national championships are concerned, Clemson has only played for one national title in your entire mediocre history, and you were put on probation almost immediately afterward
I am going to go out on a limb and say most people here don't care how many conference championships any ACC team has won because the entire conference is a joke.
As far as national championships are concerned, Clemson has only played for one national title in your entire mediocre history, and you were put on probation almost immediately afterward
Posted on 7/9/15 at 10:44 pm to Jamie Lannister
Not sure what to think of this thread. fricking awful if trying to troll. What the frick is this doing here?
Posted on 7/9/15 at 10:46 pm to CocknDawg
google 'prepharmacy South Carolina, you have to take two years of prereq classes to be accepted into pharmacy school. Most students have an undergrad degree, I have one from Clemson
I can see how it is hard to believe though. I dropped out so doesn't matter
i'm a college dropout. I failed
I took Dr Bryson and Dr Handy's organic chemistry classes
I can see how it is hard to believe though. I dropped out so doesn't matter
i'm a college dropout. I failed
I took Dr Bryson and Dr Handy's organic chemistry classes
This post was edited on 7/9/15 at 10:48 pm
Posted on 7/9/15 at 10:49 pm to AUtigerNOLA
quote:
Not sure what to think of this thread. fricking awful if trying to troll. What the frick is this doing here?
OP is a troll but likes to call everybody else meanies that "lack people skills" when he gets called out on his trolling.
Posted on 7/9/15 at 10:52 pm to AUtigerNOLA
auburn fan going to say this. it is predictable.
but fact remains over half of auburn's wins, 16 of them were in 1910s and 1960s when football was basically club sport, and Auburn beating Clemson was similar to Clemson beating Furman due to Clemson's small size. we don't talk about our record against Furman.
Record is 3-2 Auburn over Clemson last 3 decades with 2 of auburn's wins went overtime and the other was 4 point win. Auburn may have been average or bad in 1980s for all I know, and Clemson never played AUburn in that decade and that was best decade for Clemson. who knows, we could have won 5 or more against auburn that decade
but fact remains over half of auburn's wins, 16 of them were in 1910s and 1960s when football was basically club sport, and Auburn beating Clemson was similar to Clemson beating Furman due to Clemson's small size. we don't talk about our record against Furman.
Record is 3-2 Auburn over Clemson last 3 decades with 2 of auburn's wins went overtime and the other was 4 point win. Auburn may have been average or bad in 1980s for all I know, and Clemson never played AUburn in that decade and that was best decade for Clemson. who knows, we could have won 5 or more against auburn that decade
Posted on 7/9/15 at 10:52 pm to Jamie Lannister
quote:This is the only thing I give a shite about in your OP.
Auburn is (34-13-2) against Clemson.
Good day, sir.
Posted on 7/9/15 at 10:54 pm to DorchesterGamecock
my opinion, most people who throw the 'troll' word around are generally trolls or control freaks.
I can't troll you because you don't even have to look at the thread and you can use ignore feature. you are here voluntarily and you know that i'm posting.
all I did is look at the series record by decade and threw out some of auburn's wins over Clemson in early days of football when Clemson was like 1000 students. this isn't trolling by any stretch. you feel free to count all the wins but the impression Auburn fans give is Clemson was the same university that it is today since 1890. but it was basically the citadel until 1965.
why not go mingle with the other people on here on a different topic
you aren't even an Auburn fan so why do you even care what I say about them, they dump on SC all the time too. it would be like me getting all worked up over a UVA fan talking 'trash' about UNC academic scandal. i'd be more likely to join the uva grad given unc was reason we got 2 additional post season bans in 1980s. now unc is against ACC doing bans in addition to NCAA bans
I can't troll you because you don't even have to look at the thread and you can use ignore feature. you are here voluntarily and you know that i'm posting.
all I did is look at the series record by decade and threw out some of auburn's wins over Clemson in early days of football when Clemson was like 1000 students. this isn't trolling by any stretch. you feel free to count all the wins but the impression Auburn fans give is Clemson was the same university that it is today since 1890. but it was basically the citadel until 1965.
why not go mingle with the other people on here on a different topic
you aren't even an Auburn fan so why do you even care what I say about them, they dump on SC all the time too. it would be like me getting all worked up over a UVA fan talking 'trash' about UNC academic scandal. i'd be more likely to join the uva grad given unc was reason we got 2 additional post season bans in 1980s. now unc is against ACC doing bans in addition to NCAA bans
This post was edited on 7/9/15 at 11:07 pm
Posted on 7/9/15 at 11:00 pm to Jamie Lannister
quote:
Record is 3-2 Auburn over Clemson last 3 decades with 2 of auburn's wins went overtime and the other was 4 point win. Auburn may have been average or bad in 1980s for all I know, and Clemson never played AUburn in that decade and that was best decade for Clemson. who knows, we could have won 5 or more against auburn that decade
Auburn was really down in then 80s. No doubt Clemson would've won all 5.
Posted on 7/9/15 at 11:06 pm to Jamie Lannister
quote:
you aren't even an Auburn fan so why do you even care what I say about them, they dump on SC all the time too. .
So. This is the SEC RANT. We all dump on each other actually.
Then we collectively dump on outsiders (like yourself) that try to join in with their weak trolling attempts.
If this thread isn't evidence enough then I'll say it... Nobody wants you here.
This post was edited on 7/9/15 at 11:09 pm
Posted on 7/9/15 at 11:08 pm to Jamie Lannister
I thought you were leaving
Posted on 7/9/15 at 11:10 pm to DorchesterGamecock
quote:
So. This is the SEC RANT. We all dump on each other actually. Then we collectively dump on outsiders (like yourself) that try to join in with their weak trolling attempts. If this thread is evidence enough then I'll say it... Nobody wants you here.
I talk about football. you can[t deny that. all you do is say troll over and over. it is weird
it is a FOOTBALL forum. I do in fact talk about football. Clemson plays Sec teams a good bit, more than most OOC teams, and I went to SC for 2 semesters.
YOU don't want me here. you don't speak for everybody. nobody elected you spokesperson as far as I know.
you seem to dislike any affable banter between fans of opposing schools. that['s the most fun part about sports though
the forum gives you option of selecting evry OOC program in the country. if ooc fans prohibited that would not be the case. if the forum owners say no OOC fans allowed I will abide by it.
This post was edited on 7/9/15 at 11:15 pm
Posted on 7/9/15 at 11:11 pm to Jamie Lannister
quote:
(no message)
This is the most intelligent thing you've posted in this entire thread!
Posted on 7/9/15 at 11:13 pm to weagle99
quote:
Speaking of sanctions, what happened to Ol' Danny and the boys after 1981?
I doubt it was just Danny Ford considering how hard the NCAA hammered Charlie Pell.
Posted on 7/9/15 at 11:16 pm to DuncanIdaho
It is a little odd Clemson is already scheduled to play Auburn again. I bet Dabo thinks if he beats Auburn he will be a candidate to replace Nick Saban. No chance.
I'll give Dabo one thing, for a guy that pretty much knows nothing about football, he can recruit and hired some good assistants. It's cute he carries a play sheet on the sidelines.
I'll give Dabo one thing, for a guy that pretty much knows nothing about football, he can recruit and hired some good assistants. It's cute he carries a play sheet on the sidelines.
Posted on 7/9/15 at 11:17 pm to Jamie Lannister
You think you deserve any better than that? You came in here with this asinine OP that totally blew up in your face because you failed so badly with your information. It's clear that you don't know shite about Auburn and you apparently know very little about Clemson either.
This post was edited on 7/9/15 at 11:18 pm
Posted on 7/9/15 at 11:21 pm to Jamie Lannister
"So if you exclude this decade and that decade and finally that other decade, Auburn still has a winning record against us"
That to go along with Clemson getting their colors and mascot from Auburn.
Also, Auburn has 2 national titles. We don't really care about yall, we'e just tired of playing the same team year after year.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News