Started By
Message

re: Auburn folks : What was your gut feeling seeing Dabo hoist that title trophy?

Posted on 1/17/17 at 12:20 pm to
Posted by bama will rise again
N Alabama
Member since Apr 2014
1669 posts
Posted on 1/17/17 at 12:20 pm to
I'm sorry but have you seen how some of our idiot fans act over Bama football? Hell one coach had a brick thrown in his office cuz he couldn't beat Auburn.. But yeah Clemson has a lot of pressure with what? Their two titles
Posted by coachcrisp
pensacola, fl
Member since Jun 2012
30600 posts
Posted on 1/17/17 at 12:28 pm to
Tillman, get the frick outta here. It was ok while there was a football game still to be played, but the season's over, so.....go bother your mama, big brother, little brother, or whoever you bother when you get tired of playing on the computer....run along.
Posted by Tillman
Member since May 2016
12363 posts
Posted on 1/17/17 at 12:29 pm to
you alabama people probably need to leave the state every now and then. you act like the only intese fanbase is Alabama, only a sheltered naive person could believe that.

you act like there is more pressure at alabama because they won more titles in hte past lol. that makes no sense.

tell the past 3 or 4 NC State coaches there is no pressure to win at NCSU. lol
This post was edited on 1/17/17 at 12:36 pm
Posted by i am dan
NC
Member since Aug 2011
24784 posts
Posted on 1/17/17 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

Incredible. Dabo wins a national title and is leading one of two programs with six consecutive 10-win seasons and we're talking about how much he can't coach and doesn't know shite.


Clemson is a really good team, but let's see how he does without Watson in there at QB.
Posted by BHMKyle
Birmingham, AL
Member since Feb 2013
5076 posts
Posted on 1/17/17 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

didn't do much between 1992 and Saban


Didn't "do much" between 1992 and Saban relative to winning 4 Championships in 10 years like they have under him... sure. But to say they "didn't do much" is a bit of a stretch.

From 1993-2006, Alabama spent 125 weeks in the AP Top 25. Clemson spent just 68 weeks ranked in the Top 25.

From 1993-2006, Alabama spent 45 weeks in the AP Top 10. Clemson spent 7 weeks ranked in the Top 10.

From 1993-2006, Alabama spent 22 weeks in the AP Top 5. Clemson spent 4 weeks ranked in the Top 5.

If you take just Final AP Rankings between 1993 and 2006 to see how the programs of college football ranked in terms of AP Poll Points (25 pts for a 1st place finish, 24 pts for a 2nd place finish, etc.), this is how it all shook out:

1. Florida State- 229
2. Florida- 226
3. Ohio State- 208
4. Nebraska- 192
5. Miami- 184
6. Michigan- 182
7. Tennessee- 166
8. Texas- 160
9. USC- 145
10. Penn State- 143
10. Kansas State- 143
12. Oklahoma- 140
13. Virginia Tech- 138
14. Auburn- 133
15. Georgia- 128
16. LSU- 127
17. Alabama- 104
17. Wisconsin
19. Notre Dame- 96
20. Colorado- 95
21. Oregon- 87
22. Washington St.- 71
23. Texas A&M- 70
24. Iowa- 63
25. Louisville- 58

Where's Clemson? You'll have to go all the way down to #46 to find them. Right below Northwestern and TCU, but slightly ahead of Ole Miss and Mississippi State.

Congrats.
Posted by Tillman
Member since May 2016
12363 posts
Posted on 1/17/17 at 12:37 pm to
that is only b/c a past Clemson president and athletic director undermined the football program when they fired Danny Ford.

again, record and conference titles and national ttiels are not proof that there is more pressure to win at Alabama than Clemson and other places. that's just Alabama fans doing marketing.

bama also had a lot of wins vacated, something Bama fans never talk about
This post was edited on 1/17/17 at 12:39 pm
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
105415 posts
Posted on 1/17/17 at 12:42 pm to
Don't waste your time arguing with that dude.

He has little understanding of what we all are discussing most of the time.

He is rather ignorant and lives with blinders on.

As a Princess in the freezing North once said to me.

"Let it Go!"
Posted by Tillman
Member since May 2016
12363 posts
Posted on 1/17/17 at 12:44 pm to
nah you guys just act like Alabama football is a bigger deal than it is. a lot of is just fans doing propaganda for recruiting. i get it.

fanbases all over the south are the exact same. no more pressure to win at bama than anywhere else. no of titles has nothing to do with pressure to win
This post was edited on 1/17/17 at 12:46 pm
Posted by JRoweMDN
Florida
Member since Jan 2016
703 posts
Posted on 1/17/17 at 12:46 pm to
To answer the original question, I was unhappy when I realized that no meteor was inbound so neither team could win.

To see Dabo win- Mixed emotions like watching your worst enemy go off a cliff in your new Maserati...

I just cannot like Dabo at all. He is smarmy, goofy, trolling, dicknose of a coach. I think he has brought talent, but I think he has to have that Heisman guy to get above #2 in the ACC. If he continues to recruit like he has done I may give him more respect. I don't think he is a good game coach which is why the term "clemsoning" came about.

As for pressure right now, there is no more pressured place to win a championship than UA. It is almost tradition like the poster above said about blue blood BB teams. The only difference is you have to win an SEC championship to get there. And they are Bammers.
Posted by Tillman
Member since May 2016
12363 posts
Posted on 1/17/17 at 12:48 pm to
i love how Bama fans say only reason Dabo won is b/c he had a great QB, as though Bama isn't stacked with talent. i think it is safe to say every coach needs a bunch of talented players wo in a natty, not just Clemson. in my opinion, Saban has exploited the fact the SEC has not been good especially at QB position in recent years.

there is absolutely no pressure for Saban to win another national title now. he has won 4 at Alabama in the last decade and been to another. what is the pressure. he's not on the hot seat. the only reason Bama fans expect to win the natty ever year is b/c Saban. has won 4 of them. that has nothing to do with pressure to win.

the truth of the matter is Saban would be able to stay at Alabama for another 10 years even if they are mediocre seasons, similar to what happened at FSU with Bowden. lol

what also cracks me up is Alabama coveniently ignore the fact walkon Renfrow destroyed them two years in a row and caught the game winning TD in which he was wide open due to good play calling. Also Mike Williams and Legget made incredible catches on that drive. it wasn't all Watsonn.

if a walkon makes the game winning catch and was wide open, it is interesting that bama fans would try to reduce Dabo's and Clemson's success to a QB. Renfrow probably would have not been able to play at Alabama, coaches would not have given him a chance.
This post was edited on 1/17/17 at 12:58 pm
Posted by BHMKyle
Birmingham, AL
Member since Feb 2013
5076 posts
Posted on 1/17/17 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

you alabama people probably need to leave the state every now and then.

you act like there is more pressure at alabama because they won more titles in hte past lol.


Let's review...

1. Alabama fired Bill Curry the year he WON AN SEC TITLE and finished #9 in the country because he lost 3 straight times to Auburn.

2. Alabama ran off National Championship coach Gene Stallings because he had back-to-back 3-loss seasons.

3. Dennis Franchione bolted Tuscaloosa after a 10-win season for Texas A&M simply because he could not take the pressure.

And things aren't any better on the other side of the state with Auburn:

1. Auburn fired Tommy Tuberville after he had Auburn as the #12 program in the AP during his decade on the Plains. Not even an SEC Championship Trophy and a 7-3 record against Alabama was able to save him.

2. Gene Chizik was fired two years after winning a National Title because he had one losing season.

3. Now about half of the Auburn fans want to run off Gus despite the fact that he's won an SEC Title and had Auburn in the Final Top 25 in three out of four seasons.

No on is saying that Clemson fans don't expect their coach to win. But Tommy Bowden somehow made it as head coach for 10 seasons despite zero conference Titles, one lone Top 20 finish, and zero 10-win seasons. I can just tell you right now, there are at least 7 SEC jobs that would never let a coach hang out with that record for a 10th season.... it just wouldn't happen.
This post was edited on 1/17/17 at 1:01 pm
Posted by Tillman
Member since May 2016
12363 posts
Posted on 1/17/17 at 12:58 pm to
that isn't proof there is more pressure at Alabama, just more knee jerk rednecks in charge of the programs.

Ken Hatfield was fired after 4 solid seasons inclding an ACC title.

a lot of what is factored into keeping a coach is how many tickets are being sold. Bowden did get the excitement back at Clemson after the Hatfield and West era. Clemson will also keep a coach longer if the player's are doing good in the classroom.

i do agree that the focus on football player academics is less at most SEC schools. but doesn't have anything to do with pressure. at Clemson there actually more pressure on coaches b/c the school does say academics matters for the players too.

one of the main reasons Danny Ford was forced out is b/c he wanted a lavish dorm for football players but CU wanted to build an academic center for football players to help them keep their grades up.
This post was edited on 1/17/17 at 1:05 pm
Posted by BHMKyle
Birmingham, AL
Member since Feb 2013
5076 posts
Posted on 1/17/17 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

that isn't proof there is more pressure at Alabama,


Sure there is. It's already been given to you. If you don't win 10 games and at the very least conference titles at Alabama or Auburn (or any of the big SEC programs for that matter), you'll be canned.

At Clemson, you get a decade to try.

quote:

just more knee jerk rednecks in charge of the programs.

Ken Hatfield was fired after 4 solid seasons inclding an ACC title.


So why was that? Knee jerk rednecks?
Posted by Tillman
Member since May 2016
12363 posts
Posted on 1/17/17 at 1:05 pm to
ticket sales went down b/c people though Danny Ford got railroaded and people just liked Ford, Hatfield wasn't' likeable.

it is stupid to say it is a pressure cooker for a coach that has won 4 national title in recent years. lol i would say that his onside kick thing last year is proof he wasn't under pressure. You are trying to win your first title at a program, you don't do that with the game tied and the other team has a great QB.

ask Bowden if it wasn't a pressure cooker for him the entire time he was there. lol i don't think he thought he was on easy street. he did improve the program significantly over Tommy West and the teams were more fun to watch than in the past.

i assume you would say more pressure at UGA than Clemson yet they kept Marc Richt for 15 years.
This post was edited on 1/17/17 at 1:11 pm
Posted by BHMKyle
Birmingham, AL
Member since Feb 2013
5076 posts
Posted on 1/17/17 at 1:11 pm to
In all honesty, I doubt Dabo Swinney would have survived at Alabama or Auburn long enough to win a National Title

Year 1: 5 losses including one to your arch-rival South Carolina (7-6). Not to mention an embarrassing loss to Maryland (2-10).

Year 2: a horrible 6-7 record culminating in a second consecutive loss to arch-rival South Carolina (9-5) and a bowl game loss to South Florida (8-5). Ouch.

Year 3: An ACC Title probably wouldn't be enough to overcome the fact that he lost 4 of his final 6 games... including a 3rd consecutive loss to arch-rival South Carolina and the infamous 70-33 loss in the Orange Bowl to West Virginia.

Dabo averaged 5.3 losses per season during his first three years. That plus an 0-3 record in those years against South Carolina would not have kept him around at literally half of the SEC schools.
Posted by Tillman
Member since May 2016
12363 posts
Posted on 1/17/17 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

(8-5). Ouch.

Year 3: An ACC Title probably wouldn't be enough to overcome the fact that he lost 4 of his final 6 games... including a 3rd consecutive loss to arch-rival South Carolina and the infamous 70-33 loss in the Orange Bowl to West Virginia.

Dabo averaged 5.3 losses per season during his first three years. That plus an 0-3 record in those years against South Carolina would not have kept him around at literally half of the SEC scho


this is evidence Clemson has a better athletic deparmtnet now compared to SEC schools.

but again,, this isn't proof that it is less of a pressure cooker. i can tell u Dabo was feeling the pressure especially after losing to SC 5 years in a row.

u guys act like the school doesn't have to pay a lot of money to break a contract with a coach. CLemson probably would ahve moved on to another coach sooner if not for the contract. I think CU is still paying Bowden.
This post was edited on 1/17/17 at 1:15 pm
Posted by BHMKyle
Birmingham, AL
Member since Feb 2013
5076 posts
Posted on 1/17/17 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

this is evidence Clemson has a better athletic deparmtnet now compared to SEC schools.


If by "better athletic deparmtnet" you mean allowing coaches to hang around and lose 5+ games per season, then yes, you are correct.

Obviously the SEC could learn from other schools that sometimes coaches don't reach their prime years until Year 5 or 6.... usually they are long gone by then in the SEC if they hadn't been winning already. So you are right about that.

So why do coaches not get that long to try to win in the SEC.... MORE PRESSURE.

Thanks for proving everyone right.
Posted by Tillman
Member since May 2016
12363 posts
Posted on 1/17/17 at 1:16 pm to
what did Richt win at UGA?

so you think Saban would get fired after three medicore seasons? even though he has won 4 national titles and almost a 5th one at Alabama.

you not even responding to this point of mine.

how many titles has UGA won recently? How many conference titles? so much mor epressure at UGA right?

.
This post was edited on 1/17/17 at 1:19 pm
Posted by BHMKyle
Birmingham, AL
Member since Feb 2013
5076 posts
Posted on 1/17/17 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

u guys act like the school doesn't have to pay a lot of money to break a contract with a coach.


Ummm. Go do some digging on Auburn paying ex-coaches and you'll see its the norm for them to have 3 or more former coaches on the payroll at any given time.

If your program expects to win, a buyout is irrelevant no matter what the cost.
Posted by Tillman
Member since May 2016
12363 posts
Posted on 1/17/17 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

f your program expects to win, a buyout is irrelevant no matter what the cost.




so UGA must not expect to win if they keep RIcht for 15 years huh.

your own program undermines your stupid points.

Dabo won the ACC in his 3rd full season, t hat was the same year they lost to WV big in that bowl game.

so to psuh your hack premise, you talke abou tthe WV blowout but not fact CLemson won the acc title that year. lol

so Clemson kept a coach an ACC title for the firs time in awhile after his 3rd season. b/c there's no pressure. lol
This post was edited on 1/17/17 at 1:24 pm
Jump to page
Page First 4 5 6 7 8 ... 16
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 16Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter