Started By
Message
re: Auburn depth chart released
Posted on 8/28/12 at 12:17 pm to Mullen3:16
Posted on 8/28/12 at 12:17 pm to Mullen3:16
So you cut yourself and you like to frick men in the arse.
0
Posted on 8/28/12 at 12:17 pm to CaptainBrannigan
Auburns starters seem a lot smaller in size than BAMA and LSU.
Posted on 8/28/12 at 12:18 pm to TheSandman
quote:
Auburn depth chart released quote: The LB's are super light...if any teams OL get to the second level those LB' stand no chance.
I've got a feeling we won't have to worry about that too often
Oh really, you don't think teams will get to the second level against that DL? Tell us which players will demand a double team. Tell us how four down lineman are gonna prevent five OL and a TE from getting into the second level of defenders.
Posted on 8/28/12 at 12:18 pm to blzr
Fair enough. I guess I didn't recognize the quality.
Why is Nosa 3rd string? I feel like he's regressed over time.
Why is Nosa 3rd string? I feel like he's regressed over time.
Posted on 8/28/12 at 12:18 pm to blzr
Wow, Auburn's OL is going to take their lumps...
Posted on 8/28/12 at 12:18 pm to parkjas2001
quote:
Only 3 upperclassmen on offense
WR: 1. Emory Blake (6-1, 193, Sr.)
WR: 1. or Travante Stallworth (5-9, 191, Sr.).
RB: 1. Onterio McCalebb (5-11, 173, Sr.)
FB: 1. Jay Prosch (6-0, 260, Jr.).
LG: 1. John Sullen (6-3 313, Sr.)
TE: 1. Philip Lutzenkirchen (6-4, 256, Sr.)
This post was edited on 8/28/12 at 12:20 pm
Posted on 8/28/12 at 12:19 pm to SECSolomonGrundy
quote:
Oh really, you don't think teams will get to the second level against that DL? Tell us which players will demand a double team. Tell us how four down lineman are gonna prevent five OL and a TE from getting into the second level of defenders.
Such sweet concern over our team.
Posted on 8/28/12 at 12:21 pm to Tuscaloosa
4 not 3...Reed is starting.
Posted on 8/28/12 at 12:22 pm to parkjas2001
quote:
parkjas2001
Can you answer my question? You seem vastly intelligent.
Posted on 8/28/12 at 12:23 pm to Mullen3:16
because frick you...thats why.
Posted on 8/28/12 at 12:24 pm to parkjas2001
quote:
Reed is starting.
That'd still make 5, right?
WR: 1. Emory Blake (6-1, 193, Sr.)
RB: 1. Onterio McCalebb (5-11, 173, Sr.)
FB: 1. Jay Prosch (6-0, 260, Jr.).
LG: 1. John Sullen (6-3 313, Sr.)
TE: 1. Philip Lutzenkirchen (6-4, 256, Sr.)
Posted on 8/28/12 at 12:24 pm to Tuscaloosa
Is the lightness of AU's LBs by design?
Never mind. 241 and 230 isn't that bad.
Never mind. 241 and 230 isn't that bad.
This post was edited on 8/28/12 at 12:27 pm
Posted on 8/28/12 at 12:26 pm to Tuscaloosa
why does everyone care so much about our Depth chart?
Posted on 8/28/12 at 12:26 pm to parkjas2001
quote:
parkjas2001
Exactly the response I expected from you. Bravo.
Posted on 8/28/12 at 12:28 pm to Tuscaloosa
quote:
That'd still make 5, right?
I know why i cant count...the chart lists 12 positions, not 11. It lists 3 WR.
so 5 in some formations and 4 in others.
Posted on 8/28/12 at 12:28 pm to speckledtrout
When you ranke 78th in defense, you have lots of room for improvement.
Posted on 8/28/12 at 12:28 pm to AuburnCPA
quote:
why does everyone care so much about our Depth chart?
I hate these type of stupid responses. It's 2 days before CFB starts, everyone is looking for anything to talk FB about...a depth chart is posted, it's going to get many responses. It's the same way with the Arkansas thread, UGA thread, etc...
Posted on 8/28/12 at 12:29 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
I hate these type of stupid responses. It's 2 days before CFB starts, everyone is looking for anything to talk FB about...a depth chart is posted, it's going to get many responses. It's the same way with the Arkansas thread, UGA thread, etc...
oh is that whats happening?
Posted on 8/28/12 at 12:31 pm to northalabamacracker
quote:
When you ranke 78th in defense, you have lots of room for improvement.
That's a good point. Why did they blow a-hole so hard last year?
Was it players or corch?
Posted on 8/28/12 at 12:31 pm to Sarcastro
quote:
Is the lightness of AU's LBs by design?
It was under Tubbs, but not anymore. BVG wants bigger, more physical lb's. We should have that next season with frost / cassanova / foster / johnson ect..
Page 7 of 10
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News