Started By
Message

re: 1992 Expansion Question

Posted on 6/26/15 at 7:31 am to
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51241 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 7:31 am to
South Carolina was basically the last option for the sec.
Posted by Jamie Lannister
Member since Jun 2015
2143 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 7:33 am to
quote:

Google why Florida State declined to join the SEC and you will read how their past "greatest" coach ever, was scared to join the SEC. I love that they're in a conference that spans hundreds of miles. Hey FSU enjoy your two year trips to Penn. and NY. Ask any Ga. Tech fan if they screwed up by leaving the SEC. The ACC is on the brink of existence.


This makes no sense, ACC is on the brink of existence?

It has most of the major universities on the east coast.
Posted by SavageOrangeJug
Member since Oct 2005
19758 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 7:36 am to
quote:

Which schools turned down the SEC and where did Arkansas and SC fall in the pecking order?


I know FSU turned it down.

I am pretty sure Miami was offered as well. I could be wrong.
Posted by tedmarkuson
texas
Member since Feb 2015
2592 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 7:42 am to
first things first, the architect of expansion was Harvey Schiller roy kramer's predecessor, krammer gets credit for it by the uniformed but by the time kramer came on the scene expansion was a done deal.

the target's were arkansas and texas, the original idea came from frank broyles who first floated the idea to his protege and close friend Tennessee AD doug dickey. broyles felt like given his relationship with darrell royal and deloss dodd he could deliver texas as well.

dickey floated expansion to schiller and the three men dickey, broyles and schiller met at the master's tournament where schiller upon first meeting broyles remarked is it true?

LINK

As the landscape of college athletics continues to rattle with the looming prospects of major conference realignment, Harvey Schiller was recently recalling what might have been.

From 1986-89, Schiller was the commissioner of the SEC. Light years ahead of his contemporaries, Schiller helped to spectacularly alter the direction of the SEC by moving toward expansion and a championship game in football.

In a recent interview, Schiller reflected back on how Arkansas and South Carolina became the 11th and 12th schools in the league. But the most shocking revelation concerned how close the University of Texas came to joining the SEC.

Schiller, who left the SEC to become the executive director of the United States Olympic Committee and would later serve as president of Turner Sports and CEO of YankeeNets (going from working for Ted Turner to George Steinbrenner), said Texas had virtually agreed to become an SEC member. Arkansas and Texas would join the SEC from the Western side and South Carolina and either Florida State, Miami or Virginia Tech would enter from the East.

As for Schiller, he was not around to see his expansion efforts come to fruition, but it was definitely his baby, even though most in the media today continue to give Kramer all of the credit.
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29177 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 7:47 am to
quote:

Ann Richards was governor, and a Baylor alum. She saved that program.


Yes but that's only because the Big 8 needed to jump to 12 to get a championship game. The SEC wanted some combination of Arkansas, Texas A&M, tu, Florida State, Miami and South Carolina.

That school in Austin was never interested in the SEC and rebuffed all interest. That had nothing to do with Baylor.

Once the SEC made the jump to 12 and created a conference championship, only then was the Big 8 looking for 4 more schools, and the "Ann Richardson forcing Baylor in" narrative make sense. If the championship game wasn't a factor, the Big 8 would have never taken Texas Tech and Baylor.
Posted by tedmarkuson
texas
Member since Feb 2015
2592 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 8:34 am to
quote:

That school in Austin was never interested in the SEC and rebuffed all interest. That had nothing to do with Baylor.




"The one that made the most sense was Texas," Schiller said. "I spent some time with DeLoss Dodds (the Texas athletic director) and he really wanted to join the conference."

Done deal. Everything agreed to but the name on the dotted line. Then, it all came apart.

"The state legislature (in Texas) somehow got wind of it through Texas A&M and said we had to bring in both schools or we couldn't take Texas," Schiller said.

The SEC didn't want A&M. Ultimately, the two Texas schools would leave the Southwest Conference and join the Big 12.


correct on ann richards forcing gaylor into the deal leaving the swc for the big 12, it was the faggies that kept texas from going to the sec.

LINK
Posted by hogminer
Bella Vista, AR.
Member since Apr 2010
9626 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 8:42 am to
quote:

That school in Austin was never interested in the SEC and rebuffed all interest. That had nothing to do with Baylor.


Texas was a done deal until A&M and Ann Richards threw a hissy fit.
Posted by StopRobot
Mobile, AL
Member since May 2013
15375 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 8:47 am to
quote:

Arkansas and Texas was offered.



were offered

Sorry, its a pet peeve
Posted by Quidam65
Q Continuum
Member since Jun 2010
19307 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 8:48 am to
According to this article:

LINK

1. Arkansas jumped on board as soon as they could.
2. Texas A&M and Texas wanted to go, but in-state politics kept them from doing so (when the SWC folded, the same in-state politics forced them into the Big 12 and made the conference take Baylor and Texas Tech).
3. Florida State (specifically, Bobby Bowden) wanted nothing to do with a potentially brutal schedule that the SEC would provide.
4. Miami was trying to improve its basketball program and (at that time) was actually drawing students from Big East territory, ultimately it ended up in the Big East (and later the ACC).
5. South Carolina was actually last on the list and had a deficit the prior year. But like the poor kid Charlie in Willy Wonka who ended up with a Golden Ticket, SC ended up with the invitation and like Arkansas did not hesitate to sign up.
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34330 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 9:37 am to
quote:

it was the faggies that kept texas from going to the sec.


We kept them from going to the PAC in 2010. That is straight from the mouth of Chip Brown, Texas's most famous realignment figure.
Posted by TheDude321
Member since Sep 2005
3155 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 10:16 am to
quote:

Miami was trying to improve its basketball program


Please don't write this. Yes, I think this was UM's "official" reason for rejecting the SEC, but everyone knew that they really held a view similar to Bowden's (we-can't-take-a-tough-schedule-like-the-SEC's-week-after-week). UM was used to winning national titles back in the 1980s (simply by going undefeated against very, very weak schedules with opponents like East Carolina, Rutgers, Temple, etc.). They ended up joining the Big Least conference instead of the SEC to guarantee their easy schedules. Their basketball excuse is particularly weak because the SEC was actually good at the sport (at the time, at least), and UM didn't bother making any improvements in that sport any way.
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54617 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 10:21 am to
quote:

1. Arkansas jumped on board as soon as they could.


The Colorado option?
Posted by hogminer
Bella Vista, AR.
Member since Apr 2010
9626 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 10:39 am to
quote:

The Colorado option?


No. Arkansas is the one who initiated the expansion. That's the difference between leaders and people who follow or jump off of sinking ships.
At the time of the expansion in the late 80s/1990 Arkansas was dominating all big 3 sports in the SWC.
Posted by bamamonty
Jasper,Al
Member since Feb 2014
459 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 11:01 am to
Poor ole Georgia Tech and Bobby Dodd, they got mad over "The Chick Granning" incident. Furman Bisher of the AJC fanned the flame. Probably 400 million dollars short, they have long regretted it.
Posted by boxedlunch
Member since May 2012
484 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 11:11 am to
quote:

Only one I know of was FSU.


The SEC never offered Florida State. According to Alabama's President, they were never going to invite FSU.
This post was edited on 6/26/15 at 11:14 am
Posted by FarmersFight
Austin
Member since Jan 2013
1515 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 11:48 am to
quote:

At the time of the expansion in the late 80s/1990 Arkansas was dominating all big 3 sports in the SWC.


That's simply not true. Why use hyperbole?
Posted by CtotheVrzrbck
WeWaCo
Member since Dec 2007
37538 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 12:14 pm to
Ummmmmmm.
Posted by MStateDawg
Member since Apr 2012
121 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

Also, ACC teams were really bad back then. FSU basically played a schedule of cupcakes, with the exceptions of GT and Clemson.


What do you mean "back then"? It isn't any different now.
Posted by boxedlunch
Member since May 2012
484 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

Also, ACC teams were really bad back then. FSU basically played a schedule of cupcakes, with the exceptions of GT and Clemson.


The only team that played a tougher schedule in the 90s than Florida State was Florida.
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54617 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

The only team that played a tougher schedule in the 90s than Florida State was Florida.


Come again?

Sure some of the teams were ranked when Free Shoes played them but if memory serves FSU would play Florida + 1 or 2 tough games + lots of fluff
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter