Started By
Message

Scientists prove climate change will cause heavy rainfall in Britain.

Posted on 6/2/14 at 4:32 pm
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
70891 posts
Posted on 6/2/14 at 4:32 pm
From reddit

quote:

Elizabeth Kendon gratefully acknowledges funding from the Joint DECC/Defra Met Office Hadley Centre programme (GA01101). This work forms part of a joint Met Office NERC funded project CONVEX (NE/1006680/1).

Prof Hayley J. Fowler receives funding from the Natural Environment Research Council, the European Research Council and the Leverhulme Trust.

To no one’s great surprise. Dave Thompson/PA

The state of the British summer has always been a constant source of fascination and irritation, if only for its fickle nature. Now the latest prediction is for more heavy summer downpours.

Our study, published in the journal Nature Climate Change, shows the first evidence that summer downpours in the UK could become heavier with climate change. We used a very high-resolution model more typically used for weather forecasting to study changes in hourly rainfall. Unlike current climate models, this has a fine resolution and is able to realistically represent hourly rainfall, so this allows us to make these future projections with some confidence.

What we found was that summers are likely to become drier overall by 2100, in a warming climate. But our results suggest that when it does rain, it will be heavier in short outbreaks. In particular, intense rainfall with the potential to cause serious flash flooding (more than 30mm in an hour) could become a more common occurrence, increasing in frequency by several times.

What the study provides is a much more complete picture of how UK rainfall may change in the future. Climate models generally work at coarse resolutions, using grids of around 12km square or larger. These have been able to accurately simulate winter rainfall, which generally comes from sustained, long-lasting periods of rain from large-scale weather systems. These models point toward wetter winters, with the potential for greater daily rainfall in the future.

But summer weather is harder to predict using such coarse models. It is changes on an hourly basis that are important, as rainfall tends to come in short but intense bursts during the summer – as seen during the Boscastle flooding of 2004 and “Toon Flood” in Newcastle in 2012. So far climate models have lacked the resolution to accurately simulate the smaller-scale convective storms (intense showers formed by rising air) which cause this type of rain. To deal with this issue, our study uses the most high-resolution model ever used before in long climate simulations to examine rainfall change, based on a 1.5km square grid (the same as the UK Met Office Weather Forecast model), leading to much higher accuracy.

We ran this model to simulate two 13-year periods, one based on the current climate and one based on the climate at the end of the century under a high-emissions scenario (the IPCC’s RCP8.5 scenario). The simulations were so computationally intensive that it took the Met Office’s supercomputer – one of the world’s most powerful – about nine months to run the simulations, and even then we could only run the model for the southern half of the UK, about as far north as Manchester.

The simulation showed increased hourly rainfall intensity during winter, consistent with the simulations for the future provided by coarser resolution models and previous studies looking at changes on daily timescales. However the finely grained model also revealed that short-duration rain will become more intense during summer, something that the coarser model was unable to simulate. This finding is of major importance due to the potential for flooding: a threshold of 30mm per hour is used by theMet Office and Environment Agency Flood Forecasting Centre as guidance to indicate likely flash flooding, and our results suggest this may be exceeded more often (up to five times) and over a wider area in the future.

Our findings are only the results of one climate model and we need to wait for other centres to run similarly detailed simulations to see whether their results support these findings. However, an increase in summer storms in a warmer, moister environment is consistent with theoretical expectations, and with the limited observational studies we have of hourly rainfall to date.

This work is part of the joint Met Office and NERC-funded CONVEX project. The next steps are to see if the results are consistent with observations and predictions of hourly rainfall from climate models in other parts of the world, to be undertaken by the European Research Council-funded INTENSE project jointly run by Newcastle University academics in collaboration with the UK Met Office and other leading international scientists.


Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69895 posts
Posted on 6/2/14 at 4:33 pm to
Sure they did
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
118922 posts
Posted on 6/2/14 at 4:34 pm to
quote:

Scientists prove climate change


Stopped reading right there.
Posted by Rebelgator
Pripyat Bridge
Member since Mar 2010
39543 posts
Posted on 6/2/14 at 4:34 pm to
It normally never rains in Britain. What next rain in Seattle?
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69895 posts
Posted on 6/2/14 at 4:35 pm to
quote:

It normally never rains in Britain. What next rain in Seattle?



Humidity in Miami
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
70891 posts
Posted on 6/2/14 at 4:36 pm to
Jesus, come on.

Climate change IS happening. Whether it's from humans or not is the debate.

Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
70891 posts
Posted on 6/2/14 at 4:37 pm to
I'm sure a cop, and whatever vols&shaft does for a living, opinions about climate change should be taken more seriously than a team of scientists.
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
98918 posts
Posted on 6/2/14 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

Jesus, come on.

Climate change IS happening. Whether it's from humans or not is the debate.


Indeed. We've only been measuring the climate for a extremely small time frame in the planet's lifespan. And we've had ice ages and warmups as well in that span.
Posted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Member since Sep 2013
21146 posts
Posted on 6/2/14 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

Jesus, come on.

Climate change IS happening. Whether it's from humans or not is the debate.


Hey, hey, hey. Don't you try that reasoning bullshite here.



This is fricking 'Murica, respect it.
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69895 posts
Posted on 6/2/14 at 4:43 pm to
Hey, I Blessed the rains down in Africa, bitch.
Posted by Rebelgator
Pripyat Bridge
Member since Mar 2010
39543 posts
Posted on 6/2/14 at 4:43 pm to
Climate change is as old as the earth. To imply that it occurs at a different rate solely due to humans is narrow minded.
Posted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Member since Sep 2013
21146 posts
Posted on 6/2/14 at 4:45 pm to
quote:

Climate change is as old as the earth. To imply that it occurs at a different rate solely due to humans is narrow minded.


Although, equally, it's narrow-minded to declare that we have -no- impact on the weather at all. We clearly have some, if it's the spearhead is the important part.
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 6/2/14 at 4:48 pm to
The climate debate is a perfect 'divide and conquer' topic.

The truth is it doesn't matter, does it?

Does it really matter if the climate is changing?

If it is, we need to change. If it isn't, we still need to change.

The debate exists in its current narrow form for one reason, because it benefits both big business and big government. They want to change things in a half arse way, keep the foundation of our current lifestyle while taxing the shite out of you, making life for individuals and small business a nightmare.

We need to change, but it's not about carbon taxes or bike paths.

We need a paradigm shift in the way we live on the planet.

Posted by TreyAnastasio
Bitch I'm From Cleveland
Member since Dec 2010
46759 posts
Posted on 6/2/14 at 4:49 pm to
quote:

To imply that it occurs at a different rate solely due to humans is narrow minded.


To rule out the possibility that pumping all the shite we have into the atmosphere has had no effect on climate change is narrow minded.
Posted by Rebelgator
Pripyat Bridge
Member since Mar 2010
39543 posts
Posted on 6/2/14 at 4:51 pm to
You're a towel.
Posted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Member since Sep 2013
21146 posts
Posted on 6/2/14 at 4:52 pm to
quote:

You're a towel.


This is actually a solid point.
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69895 posts
Posted on 6/2/14 at 4:52 pm to
quote:

You're a towel.



Boom
Posted by TreyAnastasio
Bitch I'm From Cleveland
Member since Dec 2010
46759 posts
Posted on 6/2/14 at 4:53 pm to
quote:

You're a towel.


This is actually a solid point.


Am I logged in as TTsTowel by mistake?
Posted by CheeseburgerEddie
Crimson Tide Fan Club
Member since Oct 2012
15574 posts
Posted on 6/2/14 at 4:53 pm to
or we could just kill 2/3 of the population and keep living the life. I like that plan a whole lot better actually.
Posted by PrivatePublic
Member since Nov 2012
17848 posts
Posted on 6/2/14 at 4:53 pm to
quote:

Indeed. We've only been measuring the climate for a extremely small time frame in the planet's lifespan. And we've had ice ages and warmups as well in that span.


We've been in an "ice age" for the last two and a half million years. It's a designation that doesn't mean shite on a human scale.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter