Started By
Message
re: Which Presidential candidate are you most in step with?
Posted on 7/15/15 at 10:50 pm to Rebel Land Shark
Posted on 7/15/15 at 10:50 pm to Rebel Land Shark
Well seeing as most of the women who are against abortion are women you wouldn't want to frick anyway.......
Gun control, if it pulls up and left when you got her on rock and roll you need to control that shite.
If they can learn English and want to work and pay taxes they can stay if they don't, off with their heads.
By not giving other countries our money and by going and retrieving all that cash the cartels have in their countries that belongs to us.
Gun control, if it pulls up and left when you got her on rock and roll you need to control that shite.
If they can learn English and want to work and pay taxes they can stay if they don't, off with their heads.
By not giving other countries our money and by going and retrieving all that cash the cartels have in their countries that belongs to us.
0
Posted on 7/15/15 at 11:04 pm to Carolina Tide
quote:
Also comparing the IRS to the Gestapo.
It's not an illegitimate comparison. Why would you have a problem with this one?
Posted on 7/16/15 at 1:15 am to Evolved Simian
It's a bit extreme. I do understand that he's trying to pander to the far right though.
Posted on 7/16/15 at 1:29 am to Carolina Tide
I don't find it extreme at all. It's only been twenty years since the agency was found to have illegally stolen from taxpayers to meet auditor quotas.
It's been less than one year since they were found to have illegally targeted taxpayers for audit based on political affiliation. You won't find anything more Gestapo like in this country.
It's been less than one year since they were found to have illegally targeted taxpayers for audit based on political affiliation. You won't find anything more Gestapo like in this country.
Posted on 7/16/15 at 2:12 am to CatFan81
quote:
So... you're bat shite crazy?
Nope. Just not a left-wing dickbag that wants to see our country destroyed.
Posted on 7/16/15 at 2:19 am to Alahunter
Rand and Rubio tied at 90% apiece.
Jeb at 58%.
I've long conceded that Rand has a very tough road to the nomination so it looks like Rubio is the best for the GOP.
Jeb is a terrible candidate that single handedly squanders so many advantages Rubio or Rand will have as the nominee. Period.
frick Donald Trump btw.
Jeb at 58%.
I've long conceded that Rand has a very tough road to the nomination so it looks like Rubio is the best for the GOP.
Jeb is a terrible candidate that single handedly squanders so many advantages Rubio or Rand will have as the nominee. Period.
frick Donald Trump btw.
Posted on 7/16/15 at 3:21 am to Alahunter
I spent too much time on this you're welcome 
Ruby 88%
Bush 75%
Frothy 73%
Stripper Name 72%
Walker Texas Ranger 71%
Huckles Chuckles 69%
Tom Cruz 67%
I thought Lindsey was a woman 65%
ITS HAPPENING Jr. 58%
Kasich Hashish 58%
Fiona 57%
Ricky P 57%
Burns 54%
Token 53%
Vagina Dentata 43%
Hairpiece 37%
Matrix O'Mallett 20%
Ruby 88%
Bush 75%
Frothy 73%
Stripper Name 72%
Walker Texas Ranger 71%
Huckles Chuckles 69%
Tom Cruz 67%
I thought Lindsey was a woman 65%
ITS HAPPENING Jr. 58%
Kasich Hashish 58%
Fiona 57%
Ricky P 57%
Burns 54%
Token 53%
Vagina Dentata 43%
Hairpiece 37%
Matrix O'Mallett 20%
Posted on 7/16/15 at 7:19 am to Alahunter
Marco Rubio 89%
Rand Paul 82%
Ted Cruz 76%
Ben Carson 73%
Scott Walker 71%
Jeb Bush 67%
Donald Trump 54%
Hillary Clinton 34%
Bernie Sanders 31%
Rand Paul 82%
Ted Cruz 76%
Ben Carson 73%
Scott Walker 71%
Jeb Bush 67%
Donald Trump 54%
Hillary Clinton 34%
Bernie Sanders 31%
This post was edited on 7/16/15 at 7:39 am
Posted on 7/16/15 at 8:50 am to CatFan81
quote:
I'm a Libertarian, but a lot of the questions just didn't give an answer that I agreed with 100%. I certainly lean far to the left when it comes to current politics and social issues but agree that most issues are issues to be decided by the state, but I'm absolutely a fiscal conservative an a non interventionist.
Holy fricking shite. I agree with this a lot, but how did we come up with such different results?
Posted on 7/16/15 at 8:58 am to DynastyDawg
Would a majority of people on this board be down to go through some of these questions, maybe like 3 at a time, in separate threads so that we can have more direct discussions?
I found, as many others did, that the prefabricated answers in polls such as these do not fully express our opinions, and would rather have discussions about the topic rather than a broad, "who are you in step with"...
Obviously it would take a couple days and would be better if there was only one thread going at a time...
I found, as many others did, that the prefabricated answers in polls such as these do not fully express our opinions, and would rather have discussions about the topic rather than a broad, "who are you in step with"...
Obviously it would take a couple days and would be better if there was only one thread going at a time...
Posted on 7/16/15 at 9:04 am to SCLibertarian
quote:
Maybe you're too dense to understand that the political spectrum isn't linear, it's a quadrant. Libertarians and those on the far left agree on many issues, often for different reasons. I voted for Ron Paul in 2008, Ron Paul in the 2012 GOP Primary and Gary Johnson in the 202 General Election.
This. I agree with Libertarians on quite a few things and have voted Libertarian for President since the second Clinton run. Would vote dem in '16 if they nominate Sanders.
I had Sanders 96%
Posted on 7/16/15 at 9:04 am to DynastyDawg
I'm interested.
Posted on 7/16/15 at 9:05 am to Duke
Should I start?
You think enough people will care?
ETA:
Do 8 Parts. Each category gets a thread.
After the thread has run its course, post which posters agree with what candidates. Now that would be the fun part. When you get people speaking freely instead of answering questions knowing what candidates think what, they answer to get the percentages what they want them to be. I think that would be
You think enough people will care?
ETA:
Do 8 Parts. Each category gets a thread.
After the thread has run its course, post which posters agree with what candidates. Now that would be the fun part. When you get people speaking freely instead of answering questions knowing what candidates think what, they answer to get the percentages what they want them to be. I think that would be
This post was edited on 7/16/15 at 9:07 am
Posted on 7/16/15 at 9:05 am to DynastyDawg
Sounds like a plan
Posted on 7/16/15 at 9:09 am to DynastyDawg
Enough will care. We've got 808, 3nout, Hunter, you, justget, CC, and others that I'm sure will join in. We've got about 100 posts in this thread from yesterday, I'm sure there's a market for it.
Start the thread, post the questions and see where it goes.
Start the thread, post the questions and see where it goes.
Posted on 7/16/15 at 9:10 am to Agforlife
Honestly, I don't like 1 candidate above any others right now.
I get high percentages with the conservatives because my base is rather conservative. However, the issues that I disagree with them on are fairly important to me, so I end up not liking any of them really.
I fricking love the fact that Trump is in it though. Trump says what the frick he wants, and I think in a debate setting he would put a lot of pressure on the candidates to give real answers instead of some generic bullshite that means nothing. That's what I'm here for.
I get high percentages with the conservatives because my base is rather conservative. However, the issues that I disagree with them on are fairly important to me, so I end up not liking any of them really.
I fricking love the fact that Trump is in it though. Trump says what the frick he wants, and I think in a debate setting he would put a lot of pressure on the candidates to give real answers instead of some generic bullshite that means nothing. That's what I'm here for.
Posted on 7/16/15 at 9:11 am to Duke
Sounds good. I'll put it together.
Posted on 7/16/15 at 9:14 am to DynastyDawg
Trump will be out before November IMHO. He's caught fire and now every candidate is ready for him. He's got a lot of support currently, but that also puts a target on his back. It's easy to fling poo when you've got 1% support, nothing to lose. Trying to keep a large support however is a different ballgame. He gets made a fool of in the first debate, limps into the second, and then drops out.
Posted on 7/16/15 at 9:17 am to Duke
quote:
It's easy to fling poo when you've got 1% support, nothing to lose. Trying to keep a large support however is a different ballgame
Absolutely.
quote:
He gets made a fool of in the first debate, limps into the second, and then drops out.
I don't really care how he does, per say. I just hope that he keeps enough of a hardline stance one way or the other to make other candidates disagree or agree with him. Whether they slip up and do it, or do it on purpose, him being there will give us more insight into the candidates that have a real shot at the white house, IMO.
Page 5 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News