Started By
Message
2
Posted on 1/25/16 at 10:05 pm to Duke
Global warming is nature balancing itself.
Posted on 1/25/16 at 10:07 pm to Alahunter
quote:
Meanwhile, it will get hot, cold..thete will be new records as we have only recorded weather the last hundred or so yrs and people will freak. And we will live, have kids and die and nothing much will really change.
Scientists manipulate data to support the premise all the time unfortunately.
Posted on 1/25/16 at 10:09 pm to Alahunter
I mean, yes. Add energy to the system, get a new equilibrium.
Posted on 1/25/16 at 10:10 pm to Bigbens42
Hunter's good people dude. He's just a little crazy. I find it endearing.
Posted on 1/25/16 at 10:10 pm to Duke
Folks need to quit stressing then and decide if they are the fittest then.
Posted on 1/25/16 at 10:11 pm to Bigbens42
Nah, not on the seats. Thats crude. Just the handles.
Posted on 1/25/16 at 10:12 pm to Aux Arc
That would fly if it was 3% of scientist, but 97% of scientist aren't going to manipulate data
Posted on 1/25/16 at 10:14 pm to Alahunter
We'll show our fitness by solving the problem.
We've made porous liquids that can in theory far more effectively capture CO2 from the air. Advances in solar cells allow for the ability to split water and possibly take that captured CO2 to make long chain hydrocarbons. Our fitness will be using our brains to keep from killing ourselves.
We've made porous liquids that can in theory far more effectively capture CO2 from the air. Advances in solar cells allow for the ability to split water and possibly take that captured CO2 to make long chain hydrocarbons. Our fitness will be using our brains to keep from killing ourselves.
This post was edited on 1/25/16 at 10:17 pm
Posted on 1/25/16 at 10:16 pm to Alahunter
All good then, 
Posted on 1/25/16 at 10:17 pm to Pbhog
quote:
If they don't believe 97% of scientist on the issue then there is nothing you or anybody else on here can change their mind.
You need an alter to "science" for all your worship.
I've had the opportunity to speak at length with scientists who don't have an axe to grind and they acknowledge that man's contributions to climate change are likely minimal. Good luck getting financial support for that conclusion.
Posted on 1/25/16 at 10:20 pm to Aux Arc
Science is god's greatest gift to us, besides Jesus... You are wrong tho, it's to bad those "scientist" you are speaking of were able to miss lead you
Posted on 1/25/16 at 10:20 pm to Duke
They will decide in 50 yrs not allowing sunlight to reach the ground because of solar panels, is sterilizing the ground and the cause of all life dying. There is always a trade off. Always.
This post was edited on 1/25/16 at 10:22 pm
Posted on 1/25/16 at 10:21 pm to Pbhog
You are exaggerating what those 97% believe. Of course all scientists believe man contributes to climate. To what extent is the big question.
Posted on 1/25/16 at 10:22 pm to Aux Arc
By 97% of scientists, he's probably referring to the Cook et al analysis of published research concerning climate. Your "scientist" friends probably aren't climatologists and are flat wrong. The consensus isn't a coercive agent.
Posted on 1/25/16 at 10:22 pm to Alahunter
How expansive do you imagine these solar farms to be in order to block out the sun? 
This post was edited on 1/25/16 at 10:23 pm
Posted on 1/25/16 at 10:23 pm to Alahunter
On a nonrelared note...
Challenger disaster: lost tapes is on natgeo and really interesting.
Challenger disaster: lost tapes is on natgeo and really interesting.
Posted on 1/25/16 at 10:28 pm to Pbhog
quote:
, it's to bad those "scientist" you are speaking of were able to miss lead you
They are friends having open discussion with zero motive to mislead. I'll trust the opinion of an unbiased physicist before those with political and financial motivations. As Mark Twain said, "You tell me where a man gets his corn pone, and I'll tell you what his opinion is."
Posted on 1/25/16 at 10:30 pm to Aux Arc
They republicans or democrats?
Posted on 1/25/16 at 10:32 pm to Bigbens42
quote:
Your "scientist" friends probably aren't climatologists and are flat wrong
From what I have seen of climatology it is about as solid a science as political science or sociology.
Page 5 of 9
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News