Started By
Message

re: Who do you want to see added to a 16 team SEC?

Posted on 6/9/14 at 5:49 am to
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 6/9/14 at 5:49 am to
quote:

FSU & CLEMSON - would be my choice

VA TECH & NC STATE - would expand the conf best.

But I still think , that because of the GOR all current P5 teams are locked where they are or don't want to move.
With the new demands of the P5 , I think part of that negotiation will be for all 5 conferences to expand to 16.
And for that I believe all of the p5 will bring in "smaller schools" in new geographic markets for their conference.

It's settled then, ECU and Old Dominion to get us into NC and VA.
Posted by Bamatab
Member since Jan 2013
15112 posts
Posted on 6/9/14 at 6:09 am to
quote:

VA TECH & NC STATE - would expand the conf best.

I can see wanting VT over UVA because of football (although if prefer UVA), but why on earth would anyone want NCST over UNC?
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 6/9/14 at 6:10 am to
quote:

why on earth would anyone want NCST over UNC?


Because Wolfpack.
Posted by rootisback
Member since Mar 2014
3371 posts
Posted on 6/9/14 at 6:14 am to
As long as the new king of the SEC has knows geography better than the current king -- or at least which direction is west and which is east
Posted by Bamatab
Member since Jan 2013
15112 posts
Posted on 6/9/14 at 6:19 am to
quote:

Because Wolfpack.

Well, when you put it like that.
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 6/9/14 at 6:22 am to


Just messing--I've always kinda liked NC St., though. Don't really know why, but I know they have a pretty passionate fanbase.

Posted by cave canem
pullarius dominus
Member since Oct 2012
12186 posts
Posted on 6/9/14 at 6:24 am to
The only two that would fit culturally, demographically, and put enough asses in the seats are FSU and Clemson. They are both in the top 20 in attendance. Adding national brands is more important at this stage than individual markets. Adding TCU would turn on an extra 50,000 to 100,000 tv sets. Adding either of the above turns on 5-10 times that on name recognition alone. Simply adding markets does not mean shite if nobody in the market watches the team in question.Half of the names being tossed around can't put 45,000 in the stands, what makes anyone think people will pay to watch them on TV
Posted by Pavoloco83
Acworth Ga. too many damn dawgs
Member since Nov 2013
15347 posts
Posted on 6/9/14 at 6:56 am to
University of Washington and Miami
Posted by 3rddownonthe8
Atlanta, GA
Member since Aug 2011
5212 posts
Posted on 6/9/14 at 7:16 am to
Well Duke and / or UNC would be preferable over NCSU. but they may be. Package deal. And we don't need 2 from NC much less 10iled apart
Posted by GoldenFlakes
Member since Dec 2012
549 posts
Posted on 6/9/14 at 7:18 am to
UNC and Virginia

or

UNC and Duke

The money is on the east coast, not the dust belt.
Posted by 3rddownonthe8
Atlanta, GA
Member since Aug 2011
5212 posts
Posted on 6/9/14 at 7:20 am to
Fans are obsessed with brand names, not presidents, commissioners, ads, or networks. They prefer new markets , subscriptions, and money.
Posted by JawjaTigah
Bizarro World
Member since Sep 2003
22504 posts
Posted on 6/9/14 at 7:28 am to
quote:

Fans are obsessed with brand names
As such, as king of the SEC, I'd decree any two of the following:

FSU
Clemson
VaTech
West Virginia
(there is a considerable western PA tv market that would come with this one)
Oklahoma State
Georgia Tech


My preferred first two (for E/W balance) would be:
FSU
Oklahoma State

This post was edited on 6/9/14 at 7:39 am
Posted by kennymorgan
Bella Vista, AR
Member since Dec 2005
4621 posts
Posted on 6/9/14 at 7:33 am to
Pick up Clemson, Georgia Tech, Miami, and Florida State. Lose Arkansas to Conference USA and Missouri goes back to the Big 12.

East:
Florida
Florida State
South Carolina
Miami
Georgia
Clemson
Georgia Tech
Tennessee

West:
Alabama
Vandy
Kentucky
Auburn
LSU
aTm
Mississippi State
Ole Miss
Posted by Mirthomatic
Member since Feb 2013
4113 posts
Posted on 6/9/14 at 7:41 am to
quote:

Everyone seems to still be pro geographic/cultural integrity with their mentions, but I am surprised to see how many people are choosing based on the TV concern of only bringing in schools that add a state to the viewership.



People who follow realignment, and who would respond to a thread like this, are probably more likely to be thinking about it strategically.

I'd favor UNC and VTech. Adds the two remaining Southern states, as well as one blue blood basketball program (UNC) and one good football program (VTech). UVA just doesn't seem to really care about athletics. While UNC football is historically no great shakes, I think w/ SEC membership, both the new additions would see surges in their recruiting. Not only strengthening themselves in their own states, but pulling recruits from B1G territory.

But really, my first choice is just no schools in Texas or Oklahoma.
Posted by bamaclownbaby
Biloxi
Member since Jun 2013
383 posts
Posted on 6/9/14 at 7:44 am to
Cincinnati and UConn. Two schools desparately looking for a new home. And think of the MARTKETZ!!
Posted by REBEL5 AC
Member since Sep 2012
14732 posts
Posted on 6/9/14 at 7:45 am to
University of Louisiana and University of Texas...keep the flagships united.
Posted by JawjaTigah
Bizarro World
Member since Sep 2003
22504 posts
Posted on 6/9/14 at 7:48 am to
quote:

Cincinnati and UConn. Two schools desparate...
These two would serve the Bama narrative quite well, taking most of the space between Vandy or MooU and UK and being no threat to the Tide. That they have no regional connection to the SEC is only incidental.
Posted by bamaclownbaby
Biloxi
Member since Jun 2013
383 posts
Posted on 6/9/14 at 7:52 am to
At this point schools like UConn and Cincinnati are some of the only schools likely to join a power conference. You can keep wishing a school will leave the ACC, but with the 50 million exit fee and GOR it ain't happening. I was just giving actual realistic options.
Posted by RollTigers
Member since Dec 2010
3274 posts
Posted on 6/9/14 at 7:55 am to
quote:

FSU and Clemson



I don't get this. They add nothing in terms of TV sets or revenue. Might as well be Tulane or Troy in terms of what they bring to the monetary table.
Posted by JawjaTigah
Bizarro World
Member since Sep 2003
22504 posts
Posted on 6/9/14 at 8:09 am to
quote:

I was just giving actual realistic options.
But this is just your opinion. Like the rest of ours, it has no currency in the real world. This thread is merely an exercise in wishful thinking. Nothing binding. Do you really wish those two schools (Cincinnati and UConn) would be added to the Southeastern Conference? Would you really want to watch them play in the SEC?
This post was edited on 6/9/14 at 8:11 am
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter