Started By
Message
re: Missouri's future vs. Tennessee's future.
Posted on 10/1/13 at 6:04 pm to kywildcatfanone
Posted on 10/1/13 at 6:04 pm to kywildcatfanone
100
0
Posted on 10/1/13 at 6:10 pm to Manzielathon
quote:
This is the SEC....there's no need for math.
Why not math? You had you're first 10 win season since Clinton was in office last year and here you are peacocking around like A&M has actually won something. 3rd in the West and Bama pwned you like we did for so many years.
Meanwhile the clock on your Cinderella's (Manziel and Sumlin) is tick, tick, ticking away. Boo-hoo 4U.
Posted on 10/1/13 at 6:19 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
Being drunk
Never happened
quote:
trying to cover it up with a paid off officer isn't breaking the law?
Never happened
Posted on 10/1/13 at 6:21 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
WVU has an inferior state
No
quote:
Extremely comparable football programs
MU/UM has 3 BCS bowl wins?
quote:
MU better overall athletic department
We don't care about grabass, which is your only good sport. Pass
Posted on 10/1/13 at 6:25 pm to Sleeping Tiger
You are free to do what you want, but Porker is mad about Bob Stull not calling his mom back or some such nonsense. He's pathetasad.
Posted on 10/1/13 at 6:35 pm to the808bass
quote:
Sounds efficient.
They are under capacity and spent at capacity. Numbers are at rock bottom because the Vols are at rock bottom. They have no where to go but up. Even if they can get back to 8 win seasons that negative changes quickly. Ticket sales go up and donations go up. The point being made is they have already built their capacity and now must just pay it off. Put together a few 10 win seasons and that deficit goes quickly.
200 Million / 10,000 seats = 20,000 per seat
200 million / 20,000 seats = 10,000 per seat
Don't get me wrong, if the Vols stay down for another decade or so it will hurt long term. The opposite hold true as well tho and they are built up already. What would it cost to get Mizzou to a 100K stadium and a 20K arena just to match the Vols capacity?
Posted on 10/1/13 at 6:35 pm to the808bass
Well, well, well. Another promising thread, that could have promoted a legitimate discussion, ruined by idiots, pathetic narcissists and wonky stat pushers. 
Sorry, OP.
Sorry, OP.
Posted on 10/1/13 at 6:36 pm to semotruman
quote:youve been here long enough to know what was going to happen
Another promising thread, that could have promoted a legitimate discussion, ruined by idiots, pathetic narcissists and wonky stat pushers.
Posted on 10/1/13 at 6:41 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
youve been here long enough to know what was going to happen
I know. Somehow, I still hold out hope that one day a legit discussion can be held.
Posted on 10/1/13 at 6:48 pm to semotruman
quote:
legit discussion
Here's where you went wrong.
quote:
Missouri's future vs. Tennessee's future
Posted on 10/1/13 at 6:49 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
Can you explain why?
They sing John Denver and burn couches.
WVU - 2
Mizzou - 0
Posted on 10/1/13 at 6:58 pm to semotruman
quote:
Another promising thread, that could have promoted a legitimate discussion
You approached a broad issue and expected simple answers
Imagine if the thread topic was :
quote:
Missouri's short term recruiting future vs. Tennessee's short term recruiting future.
Here you are asking a simple question with a limited scope. If you want game meat to eat, you take a .22 and not a shotgun.
Posted on 10/1/13 at 7:23 pm to Cheese Grits
I know you can't say it, so I'll say it for you.
the808bass was right.
the808bass was right.
Posted on 10/1/13 at 7:25 pm to Remote Controlled
This is like:
"hey, what smells worse: dog shite or horse shite?"
"hey, what smells worse: dog shite or horse shite?"
Posted on 10/1/13 at 7:25 pm to the808bass
quote:
the808bass was right.
Right about what?
Posted on 10/1/13 at 7:27 pm to Cheese Grits
The current inefficiencies in the UT program. You're welcome.
Posted on 10/1/13 at 7:41 pm to Cheese Grits
quote:
You approached a broad issue and expected simple answers
I could come up with the OP to end all OP's. The most epic of the epic, and I could predict, with precision how it would end up.
I know you think you're some sort of liaison for all the SEC schools, but in reality, you're just another poster, with an agenda, just like 95% of all the other posters on here.
The days of legit discussion on this board have long since passed, it's turned into a cesspool of retardation, mixed with douche bags that want their own blog, mixed with frat boy fricks, sprinkled in with Porker Face.
Yet, here I am contributing to the asshattery.
Long live the rant or some shite.
Posted on 10/1/13 at 7:41 pm to Remote Controlled
quote:
a slightly better recruiting class
Try a much better recruiting class like top 10 in the country.
Posted on 10/1/13 at 7:47 pm to the808bass
Ah, got it now.
The deficit is known and when you have to outsource to IMG (which costs more and steep discounts) it eats up your profit. All this is known but what was being discussed is the difference between being at rock bottom (where the Vols are now) and how quickly they can erase it.
With Mizzou they do not already have the capacity and must build it while not having an established brand in football, basketball, baseball, or women's basketball. Before you get all upset about this comment answer the following?
a) Does Mizzou have a historic Top 12 football program?
b) Does Mizzou have a historic Top 12 basketball program?
c) Does Mizzou have a historic Top 6 baseball team?
d) Does Mizzou have a historic Top 6 W basketball program?
If the answer to any of these 4 questions is not then the Tigers will have to dominate for a good decade or so to even enter the equations and that is if one of the 12 programs falls during that time. They will have to sell capacity and use that money to expand. They will have to build their reputation as well because they do not have it now.
Vols already have all this so all they have to do is hire the right coach.
Can you see the difference?
Thanks for the link tho.
The deficit is known and when you have to outsource to IMG (which costs more and steep discounts) it eats up your profit. All this is known but what was being discussed is the difference between being at rock bottom (where the Vols are now) and how quickly they can erase it.
With Mizzou they do not already have the capacity and must build it while not having an established brand in football, basketball, baseball, or women's basketball. Before you get all upset about this comment answer the following?
a) Does Mizzou have a historic Top 12 football program?
b) Does Mizzou have a historic Top 12 basketball program?
c) Does Mizzou have a historic Top 6 baseball team?
d) Does Mizzou have a historic Top 6 W basketball program?
If the answer to any of these 4 questions is not then the Tigers will have to dominate for a good decade or so to even enter the equations and that is if one of the 12 programs falls during that time. They will have to sell capacity and use that money to expand. They will have to build their reputation as well because they do not have it now.
Vols already have all this so all they have to do is hire the right coach.
Can you see the difference?
Thanks for the link tho.
Posted on 10/1/13 at 7:47 pm to VolsMissthe90s
quote:
quote: a slightly better recruiting class Try a much better recruiting class like top 10 in the country.
For the last fricking time in this thread. Last years recruiting numbers you hillbilly frick.
Who gives two shits about Da'todd McGillicutty the 4* from backwoods, ms that gave a "verbal" to your fricking program.
For all we know he might end up going to fricking Harvard for their communications program.
frick me, I'll edit the goddamn OP so you fricks get it.
Page 6 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News