Started By
Message

re: USAF plans to retire more A-10 Warthogs; “crippling” close air support capabilities

Posted on 3/19/24 at 9:06 am to
Posted by FlyingTiger06
Bossier City, LA
Member since Nov 2004
1886 posts
Posted on 3/19/24 at 9:06 am to
quote:

Too cheap and effective


The National Defense Strategy tells us our pacing threat is China. The services are supposed to request funds that build a force to execute said strategy. With that in mind, you figure out where you think A-10s would be based for a fight against China, then overlay where you think the tankers needed to get them into the fight will come from, then look at how you think the A-10 would survive the Chinese Integrated Air Defense System (IADS). After you understand all of that, you too would know why we should have already divested the entire A-10 fleet.
Posted by Le Tenia
Member since Feb 2015
4525 posts
Posted on 3/19/24 at 9:17 am to
So you are saying that you agree with the NDS that the A-10s should no longer be in the fleet?

2nd question: If so, wouldn't the A-10s be useful elsewhere if not in the Far East strategy?

Seems like we continue to weaken our defenses when we should be strengthening it. IMO, we are getting closer and closer each day. But, but the A-10s are expensive to maintain. It's much cheaper to fly the KIA (sorry, pun intended unfortunately) and this allows us to spend the money elsewhere like say, Ukraine?? Other military resources?? Our border defense??
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram