Started By
Message

re: With 14 teams, the Big 6 should admit a 7th

Posted on 12/11/14 at 7:41 am to
Posted by JaxTiger10
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2014
3893 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 7:41 am to
quote:

t like you guys were for 20 years until Saban arrived. 


Just like 80% of Tenn success came before 1970. For the last 45 years tenn has 5 sec titles. Lsu has 4 since 2001. Lsu was a borderline top 10 alltime program before Saban got to lsu.
This post was edited on 12/11/14 at 7:45 am
Posted by JustGetItRight
Member since Jan 2012
15712 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 8:26 am to
quote:

Serious question. What was the last school outside the big 6 to win an sec title? I'm nearly certain it hasn't happened in my lifetime and I was born in 92. What has it been like 50 years?


Answered a few posts upthread.

Kentucky and Georgia finished tied in 1976, but UGA beat UK head to head and got the Sugar Bowl bid.

The last team from outside the big 6 to win a conference title outright was Ole Miss in 1963 - 51 years ago.
This post was edited on 12/11/14 at 8:27 am
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54655 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 8:31 am to
quote:

Who is the first team kicked out of the current Big 6?


Not sure, but am sure it will not be Alabama.
Posted by KajunGator
Lake Arthur, LA
Member since May 2011
7284 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 8:45 am to
quote:

Which national titles should count though?


I'd say recognized...not claimed (all National Titles during SEC era) and all SEC titles (not southern conference)

So the list would look like:

Bama 11 NC 24 SEC
Tenessee 4 NC 13 SEC
LSU 3 NC 11 SEC
UF 3 NC 8 SEC
UGA 2 NC 12 SEC
AUB 2 NC 8 SEC
This post was edited on 12/11/14 at 10:12 am
Posted by The Cajun Prince
NWA
Member since Nov 2014
139 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 8:46 am to
And what is your record against Tennessee head up?.... and I guess Tennessee's success in the 80's, 90's and 2000's just dont count which would include going to back to back NC's?
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54655 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 8:50 am to
quote:

(not southern conference)


Yeah, because you would feel the dominance of the Dores!
Posted by KajunGator
Lake Arthur, LA
Member since May 2011
7284 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 8:52 am to
quote:

Yeah, because you would feel the dominance of the Dores!


0 NC 2 Southern Con titles....11 SIAA
Posted by GumBro Jackson
Raleigh
Member since Mar 2011
3114 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 9:39 am to
I think the idea of the Big Six originated in late 80's or early 90's b/c at that time there were only six programs that had recently won SEC championships in football. As others have mentioned, last non Big Six SEC champs were Kentucky in 1976 (co-champs) and Ole Miss in 1963.

Interestingly enough 25 years later it is the exact same 6 teams that have won the SECCG (all multiple times).

The SECCG has become something of a line of demarcation (esp since it coincided w/ the first expansion), so some people prob consider Big Six to mean exclusively things that occurred in SECCG era.

I think if another team wins the SECCG the majority of people on this board would start using some kind of designator, but not assign full "Big" status. For example Big Six + 1. If that teams wins multiple SECCGs or NCs, then they would get full admission.

It would be interesting to see if the majority of people tried to kick another school out, or just expand it to Big Seven.
Posted by Tigerjackswartz
Member since Mar 2012
322 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 9:56 am to
quote:

I think if another team wins the SECCG the majority of people on this board would start using some kind of designator, but not assign full "Big" status. For example Big Six + 1. If that teams wins multiple SECCGs or NCs, then they would get full admission


I see what you are saying. So when a team finally busts through and wins an SECCG (most likely candidate being Mizzou, since they are the only non-Big 6 team making the game lately), they will go into a new category - kind of like a limbo or purgatory - where they aren't admitted to Big 6 heaven, but have transcended from the Little 8 Hell.

I like it. We have a plan.
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 9:56 am to
quote:

I'd say recognized...not claimed (all National Titles during SEC era) and all SEC titles (not southern conference)

So the list would look like:

Bama 11 NC 23 SEC
Tenessee 4 NC 15 SEC
LSU 3 NC 14 SEC
UF 3 NC 8 SEC
UGA 2 NC 14 SEC
AUB 2 NC 11 SEC

Recognized by who?
Some of your numbers are off. Alabama now has 24 SEC titles; Tennessee has 13; LSU has 11; Georgia has 12; Auburn has 8.
Posted by KajunGator
Lake Arthur, LA
Member since May 2011
7284 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 10:10 am to
quote:

Some of your numbers are off.


I see the mistake, went with what was listed Here
Posted by redeye
Member since Aug 2013
8598 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 5:19 pm to
quote:

I think the idea of the Big Six originated in late 80's or early 90's b/c at that time there were only six programs that had recently won SEC championships in football. As others have mentioned, last non Big Six SEC champs were Kentucky in 1976 (co-champs) and Ole Miss in 1963.

Interestingly enough 25 years later it is the exact same 6 teams that have won the SECCG (all multiple times).

The SECCG has become something of a line of demarcation (esp since it coincided w/ the first expansion), so some people prob consider Big Six to mean exclusively things that occurred in SECCG era.

I think if another team wins the SECCG the majority of people on this board would start using some kind of designator, but not assign full "Big" status. For example Big Six + 1. If that teams wins multiple SECCGs or NCs, then they would get full admission.

It would be interesting to see if the majority of people tried to kick another school out, or just expand it to Big Seven.


I've always heard it was simply schools that have won the SECCG and don't remember ever hearing anything about a "Big 6" until after Georgia, LSU and Auburn won it after the millennium.

Florida didn't win it's first SEC title until 1991, so it seems rather peculiar that they would have been a "Big 6" member before they'd ever won a SEC title. Not to mention that all the accomplishments of newer members during this time don't count if it didn't happen as a SEC member.

Moving the bar is just getting silly and making the idea of a "Big 6" laughable.
Posted by austingator
austin
Member since Jan 2009
7442 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 5:23 pm to
quote:

I thought Bama had dispatched you trolls, but obviously not.
Posted by KajunGator
Lake Arthur, LA
Member since May 2011
7284 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 5:23 pm to
quote:

Florida didn't win it's first SEC title until 1991



We won the SEC in '84...and vacated it in 85
Posted by redeye
Member since Aug 2013
8598 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 5:36 pm to
quote:

We won the SEC in '84...and vacated it in 85


Ah, I didn't know that. Just looked at what it said on your Wiki page.
Posted by TheDude321
Member since Sep 2005
3156 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 5:51 pm to
It did exist in the '80s:

Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145139 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 5:54 pm to
quote:

we're not knocking on the door, we're busting in
should have used different wording
Posted by TheDude321
Member since Sep 2005
3156 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 5:58 pm to
quote:

If Mizzou wins the East a couple more years in a row, we're not knocking on the door, we're busting in


Well, the SEC used to have only 10 teams, so the Big Six made up a majority...now that the conference has 14 members, the Big Six are a minority and could be outvoted when it comes to determining how its membership is derived.
Posted by Mizz-SEC
Inbred Huntin' In The SEC
Member since Jun 2013
19236 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 6:00 pm to
quote:

quote:
I think if another team wins the SECCG the majority of people on this board would start using some kind of designator, but not assign full "Big" status. For example Big Six + 1. If that teams wins multiple SECCGs or NCs, then they would get full admission


I see what you are saying. So when a team finally busts through and wins an SECCG (most likely candidate being Mizzou, since they are the only non-Big 6 team making the game lately), they will go into a new category - kind of like a limbo or purgatory - where they aren't admitted to Big 6 heaven, but have transcended from the Little 8 Hell.

I like it. We have a plan.



No. Then the goal posts would become multiples of whatever barrier was crossed.

SEC Championships, then National Championships, then some other qualifier.

Rinse, lather, repeat.
Posted by BigOrangeBri
Nashville- 4th & 19
Member since Jul 2012
12277 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 6:23 pm to
quote:

Just like 80% of Tenn success came before 1970. For the last 45 years tenn has 5 sec titles. Lsu has 4 since 2001. Lsu was a borderline top 10 alltime program before Saban got to lsu.


Haha, you pull this shite out of your arse every time. I'm i gonna have to roll your arse up again?

Since 1967 both LSU and Tennessee both have 7 SEC titles.
Tennessee has been to 33 bowl games since 1970
LSU has been to 30

Tennessee also has more overall wins since 1970


This post was edited on 12/11/14 at 6:31 pm
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter