Started By
Message
re: Will Tyrann Mathieu Cost Trent Richardson the Heisman?
Posted on 12/5/11 at 3:36 pm to Funky Tide 8
Posted on 12/5/11 at 3:36 pm to Funky Tide 8
Trent Richardson does not deserve it. He had 20TD's and like 1500 yards rushing and didn't play anyone. Monte Ball was the best running back this year by far. And played a tougher schedule than BAMA.
BAMA people need to wake up, you can fix your misery by adding some talented teams to your schedules. Your just a bunch of week vaginas that think wins are all you need. .... Excuse me, that all you gump, no teeth mutha fockers need. I still can't believe you got it. and Richardson sucks! Ingram is Average in the NFL, and Richardson will be no different.
BAMA people need to wake up, you can fix your misery by adding some talented teams to your schedules. Your just a bunch of week vaginas that think wins are all you need. .... Excuse me, that all you gump, no teeth mutha fockers need. I still can't believe you got it. and Richardson sucks! Ingram is Average in the NFL, and Richardson will be no different.
2
Posted on 12/5/11 at 3:38 pm to Rex Manning
quote:
No offense to Bama fans but I didn't think Trent had a Heisman type season either.
He had a good season but please someone give me his "heisman moment"
Hes been really constistant but not Heisman winningmaterial IMO.
Posted on 12/5/11 at 3:39 pm to tiger1014
I really think Bama getting into the BCSCG is what will end up hurting TR more. I think the voters will now give #1 to RGIII and Luck as a FU to Bama making it in. Just a thought
Posted on 12/5/11 at 3:39 pm to lsurebel4
quote:
Your just a bunch of week vaginas that think wins are all you need. .... Excuse me, that all you gump, no teeth mutha fockers need. I still can't believe you got it.
hey sweetie, you forgot to include Tradition in your wittle rant.
Posted on 12/5/11 at 3:41 pm to tiger1014
Not as much as Barkley will cost Luck. But RG3 wins easy
Posted on 12/5/11 at 3:41 pm to wildtigercat93
Personally, I think Heisman moments are overrated. I mean the reciever from Marshall had one of the most amazing catches I've ever seen, and I believe it was the game winner. But he didn't have that great of a season. Neither did Mathieu, Richardson, or Luck, in my opinion. RGIII should win it.
Posted on 12/5/11 at 3:43 pm to HandGrenade
quote:
To be fair, he didn't have a punt return for touchdown until the Arkansas game
Well Charles Woodson had 1 punt return on the entire season. It just happened to come on the last game of the year against Ohio State. Add in that he caught like 10 passes on the year and people called him a "two-way" player. The very next year, Champ Bailey was a true "two-way" player and a better cornerback, yet he got no Heisman love.
Posted on 12/5/11 at 3:45 pm to lsurebel4
quote:
Will Tyrann Mathieu Cost Trent Richardson the Heisman? Trent Richardson does not deserve it. He had 20TD's and like 1500 yards rushing and didn't play anyone. Monte Ball was the best running back this year by far. And played a tougher schedule than BAMA. BAMA people need to wake up, you can fix your misery by adding some talented teams to your schedules. Your just a bunch of week vaginas that think wins are all you need. .... Excuse me, that all you gump, no teeth mutha fockers need. I still can't believe you got it. and Richardson sucks! Ingram is Average in the NFL, and Richardson will be no different.
This man has gone full retard.
Posted on 12/5/11 at 3:45 pm to Choupique19
Good point. Still doesn't deserve it over RGIII
Posted on 12/5/11 at 3:46 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
I really think Bama getting into the BCSCG is what will end up hurting TR more. I think the voters will now give #1 to RGIII and Luck as a FU to Bama making it in. Just a thought
i think this is very true.
Posted on 12/5/11 at 3:48 pm to tiger1014
The Honey Weasel doesn't belong in the conversation with RG3, Luck, Richardson, etc.
All of the others are integral to their teams success and said teams wouldn't be where they are without them. LSU would still be where they are without Honey Weasel.
All of the others are integral to their teams success and said teams wouldn't be where they are without them. LSU would still be where they are without Honey Weasel.
Posted on 12/5/11 at 3:49 pm to HandGrenade
quote:
Personally, I think Heisman moments are overrated. I mean the reciever from Marshall had one of the most amazing catches I've ever seen, and I believe it was the game winner. But he didn't have that great of a season. Neither did Mathieu, Richardson, or Luck, in my opinion. RGIII should win it.
I dont think they are absoulutly nessesary to win it but in a race like this where no one guy has really stuck out all year (before this week nobody said shite about the heisman) ten those moments set you apart from the pact.
RGlll has deffinitly had some heisman moments, Matheiu has as well
The closest play I can think of for TR is that play vs Ole Miss . And its Ole Miss so it kinda doesnt count
Posted on 12/5/11 at 3:49 pm to CatFan81
u still mad about that strip, scoop, and score?
Posted on 12/5/11 at 3:50 pm to bingo
I think RGIII and Bama not playing this weekend will be the biggest reasons he doesn't get it. TM7 will get some of the votes that might have otherwise gone to Richardson, but I don't think he would have enough to win even with those votes.
Posted on 12/5/11 at 3:50 pm to CatFan81
quote:
All of the others are integral to their teams success and said teams wouldn't be where they are without them. LSU would still be where they are without Honey Weasel.
This is stupid ESPN reasoning. The Heisman is not an MVP award it does not go to the player most important to his team. It goes to the best player in CFB.
I dont think HB7 will or should win it but thats flawed reasoning to not even give him an invite
This post was edited on 12/5/11 at 3:51 pm
Posted on 12/5/11 at 3:50 pm to wildtigercat93
RGIII and Montee Ball have stood out 
Posted on 12/5/11 at 3:52 pm to LsuTool
quote:
u still mad about that strip, scoop, and score?
Nope. I think he's an overhyped thug. That's all.
Posted on 12/5/11 at 3:52 pm to HandGrenade
quote:
RGIII and Montee Ball have stood out
They have over the past two weeks but not over the whole season. Nobody even knew who Ball was until 2 or 3 weeks ago.
And those would he my top 2 BTW
Posted on 12/5/11 at 3:53 pm to CatFan81
quote:
The Honey Weasel doesn't belong in the conversation with RG3, Luck, Richardson, etc.
All of the others are integral to their teams success and said teams wouldn't be where they are without them. LSU would still be where they are without Honey Weasel.
Bama would still have ONE loss without Richardson. I agree with you about the LSU probably still being undefeated without Honey Badger, though.
Luck and RG3 are definitely team-makers.
However, the Heisman isn't the "MVP To Your Team Award," though that's how some idiots vote it.
Page 2 of 4
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News